World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 63 1164 1023 541 466 149 19674

Michelle van Ryn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michelle van Ryn between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michelle van Ryn published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2015. 3 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2015. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1989 2025

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michelle van Ryn: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 2
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 4
2006 3
2007 5
2008 7
2009 8
2010 13
2011 9
2012 6
2013 3
2014 11
2015 18
2016 11
2017 9
2018 7
2019 9
2020 5
2021 2
2022 1
2023 4
2024 2
2025 1
Total 156
Download as CSV

Michelle van Ryn publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle van Ryn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 149 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 149
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Michelle van Ryn D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle van Ryn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77 63
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Michelle van Ryn is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with notable contributions to subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pharmacy, Clinical Psychology, and Economics and Econometrics.

The main topics covered in their work encompass Obesity and Health Practices, Innovations in Medical Education, Diversity and Career in Medicine, Empathy and Medical Education, Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, Ethics in medical practice, and Medical Education and Admissions.

Their recent publications include:

  • A Critical Review: Moral Injury in Nurses in the Aftermath of a Patient Safety Incident, 2020, Journal of Nursing Scholarship
  • Mandated Implicit Bias Training for Health Professionals-A Step Toward Equity in Health Care, 2022, JAMA Health Forum
  • The role of weight bias and role-modeling in medical students' patient-centered communication with higher weight standardized patients, 2021, Patient Education and Counseling
  • Patient and Health Care Professional Perspectives on Stigma in Integrated Behavioral Health: Barriers and Recommendations, 2023, The Annals of Family Medicine
  • A Longitudinal Study Exploring Learning Environment Culture and Subsequent Risk of Burnout Among Resident Physicians Overall and by Gender, 2021, Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Michelle van Ryn has frequently collaborated with several coauthors, including:

  • Sean M. Phelan
  • John F. Dovidio
  • Mike Hennessy
  • Joan M. Griffin
  • Nathaniel E. Miller

Their work has been published in various venues, with a particular concentration in:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Patient Education and Counseling
  • The American Journal of Managed Care
  • Journal of Nursing Scholarship
  • JAMA Health Forum

Best Publications

  • The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patients.

    Michelle van Ryn;Jane Burke

  • Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity

    S. M. Phelan;Diana J Burgess;Mark W Yeazel;Wendy L Hellerstedt

  • Paved With Good Intentions: Do Public Health and Human Service Providers Contribute to Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health?

    Michelle van Ryn;Steven S. Fu

  • Job seeking, reemployment, and mental health: a randomized field experiment in coping with job loss.

    Robert D. Caplan;Amiram D. Vinokur;Richard H. Price;Michelle van Ryn

  • SOCIAL SUPPORT AND UNDERMINING IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS: THEIR INDEPENDENT EFFECTS ON THE MENTAL HEALTH OF UNEMPLOYED PERSONS

    Amiram D. Vinokur;Michelle van Ryn

  • Research on the provider contribution to race/ethnicity disparities in medical care.

    Michelle van Ryn

  • Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology

    Diana Burgess;Diana Burgess;Michelle van Ryn;Michelle van Ryn;John Dovidio;Somnath Saha

  • Association of clinical specialty with symptoms of burnout and career choice regret among US resident physicians

    Liselotte N. Dyrbye;Sara E. Burke;Rachel R. Hardeman;Jeph Herrin

  • Objective burden, resources, and other stressors among informal cancer caregivers: A hidden quality issue?

    Michelle van Ryn;Sara Sanders;Katherine L. Kahn;Courtney van Houtven

  • Why Do Providers Contribute to Disparities and What Can Be Done About It

    Diana J. Burgess;Diana J. Burgess;Steven S. Fu;Steven S. Fu;Michelle Van Ryn

  • The Association between Perceived Discrimination and Underutilization of Needed Medical and Mental Health Care in a Multi-Ethnic Community Sample

    Diana J Burgess;Diana J Burgess;Yingmei Ding;Margaret Hargreaves;Michelle van Ryn

  • Effects of perceived discrimination on mental health and mental health services utilization among gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender persons.

    Diana Burgess;Diana Burgess;Diana Burgess;Richard Lee;Alisia Tran;Michelle Van Ryn

  • How did it work? An examination of the mechanisms through which an intervention for the unemployed promoted job-search behavior

    Michelle van Ryn;Amiram D. Vinokur

  • THE IMPACT OF RACISM ON CLINICIAN COGNITION, BEHAVIOR, AND CLINICAL DECISION MAKING

    Michelle van Ryn;Diana J. Burgess;John F. Dovidio;Sean Phelan

  • Medical School Experiences Associated with Change in Implicit Racial Bias Among 3547 Students: A Medical Student CHANGES Study Report

    Mph Michelle van Ryn PhD;Rachel Hardeman;Sean M. Phelan;Diana J. Burgess;Diana J. Burgess

  • Long-term follow-up and benefit-cost analysis of the Jobs Program: a preventive intervention for the unemployed.

    Amiram D. Vinokur;Michelle Van Ryn;Edward M. Gramlich;Richard H. Price

  • Implicit and explicit weight bias in a national sample of 4,732 medical students: The medical student CHANGES study

    Sean M. Phelan;John F. Dovidio;Rebecca M. Puhl;Diana J. Burgess;Diana J. Burgess

  • Stereotype threat and health disparities: what medical educators and future physicians need to know

    Diana J. Burgess;Jennifer Warren;Sean Phelan;John Dovidio

  • Access to coronary artery bypass surgery by race/ethnicity and gender among patients who are appropriate for surgery.

    Edward L. Hannan;Michelle Van Ryn;Jane Burke;Danice Stone

  • Physicians’ Perceptions of Patients’ Social and Behavioral Characteristics and Race Disparities in Treatment Recommendations for Men With Coronary Artery Disease

    Michelle Van Ryn;Diana J Burgess;Jennifer Malat;Joan Griffin

  • Objective Burden, Resources, and Other Stressors Among Informal Cancer Caregivers

    Michelle van Ryn;Sara Sanders;Katherine L. Kahn;Courtney van Houtven

Frequent Co-Authors

Diana J. Burgess
Diana J. Burgess United States Department of Veterans Affairs
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Rachel R. Hardeman
Rachel R. Hardeman University of Minnesota
Katherine L. Kahn
Katherine L. Kahn University of California, Los Angeles
Patricia A. Ganz
Patricia A. Ganz University of California, Los Angeles
Liselotte N. Dyrbye
Liselotte N. Dyrbye University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Nancy L. Keating
Nancy L. Keating Harvard University
Audie A. Atienza
Audie A. Atienza National Institutes of Health
Sally W. Vernon
Sally W. Vernon The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Amiram D. Vinokur
Amiram D. Vinokur University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for social sciences and humanities professionals grows, flexible online education options are increasingly popular. Several paths can lead to rewarding careers while accommodating different schedules and budgets.

For those interested in social work, you can find cheapest online msw programs that offer quality education at an accessible cost. If speed is your priority, fastest msw program choices help you earn your credentials quickly and enter the workforce sooner.

Professionals passionate about behavioral analysis may consider bcba master's programs online for training in applied behavior analysis—a field growing in importance across educational and clinical settings.

For broader psychological studies, many students are turning to accelerated psychology degree programs. These provide a comprehensive foundation in psychology while expediting the path to advanced study or employment.

Carefully consider your interests, career goals, and personal circumstances when selecting a program. Online degree pathways make it easier than ever to align your education with your ambitions in the social sciences and humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle van Ryn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles