World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
16556
World Ranking
3496
National Ranking
1971

Amiram D. Vinokur publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amiram D. Vinokur sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Amiram D. Vinokur D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amiram D. Vinokur sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amiram D. Vinokur is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. This association positions the scientist within a prominent research institution known for a wide range of scholarly activities across various disciplines.

The available data does not list specific recent papers, frequent coauthors, or publication venues for Amiram D. Vinokur. Similarly, there is no detailed information about main or subfields of study, main research topics, or book publications. Additionally, no awards have been recorded in the available profile.

Despite limited specific bibliographic and scholarly details, Amiram D. Vinokur's professional connection to a major academic university suggests involvement in research activities and academic contributions consistent with that environment. The lack of publicly listed works or topics may indicate either a focus on areas not captured in this data set or a specialization that is not represented here.

Best Publications

  • Providing Social Support May Be More Beneficial Than Receiving It Results From a Prospective Study of Mortality

    Stephanie L. Brown;Randolph M. Nesse;Amiram D. Vinokur;Dylan M. Smith

  • Job seeking, reemployment, and mental health: a randomized field experiment in coping with job loss.

    Robert D. Caplan;Amiram D. Vinokur;Richard H. Price;Michelle van Ryn

  • Hard times and hurtful partners: how financial strain affects depression and relationship satisfaction of unemployed persons and their spouses

    Amiram D. Vinokur;Richard H. Price;Robert D. Caplan

  • Links in the chain of adversity following job loss: How financial strain and loss of personal control lead to depression, impaired functioning, and poor health.

    Richard H. Price;Jin Nam Choi;Amiram D. Vinokur

  • SOCIAL SUPPORT AND UNDERMINING IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS: THEIR INDEPENDENT EFFECTS ON THE MENTAL HEALTH OF UNEMPLOYED PERSONS

    Amiram D. Vinokur;Michelle van Ryn

  • Desirable versus undesirable life events: their relationship to stress and mental distress.

    Amiram Vinokur;Melvin L. Selzer

  • Close relationships and adjustment to a life crisis: the case of breast cancer.

    Niall Bolger;Mark Foster;Amiram D. Vinokur;Rosanna Ng

  • Unraveling the Relationship of Distress Levels Within Couples: Common Stressors, Empathic Reactions, or Crossover via Social Interaction?

    Mina Westman;Amiram D. Vinokur

  • Overload, autonomy, and burnout as predictors of physicians' quality of care.

    Arie Shirom;Nurit Nirel;Amiram D. Vinokur

  • The process of recovery from breast cancer for younger and older patients. Changes during the first year

    Amiram D. Vinokur;Barbara A. Threatt;Diane Vinokur-Kaplan;William A. Satariano

  • Impact of the JOBS intervention on unemployed workers varying in risk for depression.

    Amiram D. Vinokur;Richard H. Price;Yaacov Schul

  • Two Years After a Job Loss: Long-Term Impact of the JOBS Program on Reemployment and Mental Health

    Amiram D. Vinokur;Yaacov Schul;Jukka Vuori;Richard H. Price

  • How did it work? An examination of the mechanisms through which an intervention for the unemployed promoted job-search behavior

    Michelle van Ryn;Amiram D. Vinokur

  • Attitudes and Social Support: Determinants of Job‐Seeking Behavior and Well‐Being among the Unemployed1

    Amiram Vinokur;Robert D. Caplan

  • Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts: A group-problem-solving approach.

    Amiram Vinokur;Eugene Burstein

  • Long-term follow-up and benefit-cost analysis of the Jobs Program: a preventive intervention for the unemployed.

    Amiram D. Vinokur;Michelle Van Ryn;Edward M. Gramlich;Richard H. Price

  • Impact of a preventive job search intervention on the likelihood of depression among the unemployed.

    R. H. Price;M. Van Ryn;A. D. Vinokur

  • Determinants of perceived social support: interpersonal transactions, personal outlook, and transient affective states.

    Amiram Vinokur;Yaacov Schul;Robert D. Caplan

  • The Web of Coping Resources and Pathways to Reemployment Following a Job Loss

    Amiram D. Vinokur;Yaacov Schul

  • Mastery and inoculation against setbacks as active ingredients in the JOBS intervention for the unemployed.

    Amiram D. Vinokur;Yaacov Schul

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard H. Price
Richard H. Price University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michelle van Ryn
Michelle van Ryn Oregon Health & Science University
Rami Benbenishty
Rami Benbenishty Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Mick P. Couper
Mick P. Couper University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stephanie L. Brown
Stephanie L. Brown University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert M. Merion
Robert M. Merion University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ron Avi Astor
Ron Avi Astor University of California, Los Angeles
Yaacov Trope
Yaacov Trope New York University
Jin Nam Choi
Jin Nam Choi Seoul National University
Randolph M. Nesse
Randolph M. Nesse Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of online programs and rewarding career paths. If you’re interested in offering therapy or counseling services, becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) is a major milestone. Each region has its own requirements—so it’s important to understand what’s needed in your area.

For example, to meet the San Diego licensed therapist requirements, you must complete a counseling or psychology-focused graduate program, followed by supervised clinical hours and a licensing exam. Similarly, the licensed therapist requirements in San Francisco demand specific coursework and local supervision.

The process of becoming a licensed therapist in San Jose or fulfilling Santa Ana licensed therapist education requirements involves similar steps, but with location-specific details for coursework and experience.

Exploring these pathways will help you find the right online degree program and prepare you for state licensure. Always check local regulations to ensure you meet all requirements to advance your career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Amiram D. Vinokur

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles