World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
7626
World Ranking
7069
National Ranking
178

Andries F. Hof publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andries F. Hof sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 110 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Andries F. Hof D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andries F. Hof sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andries F. Hof is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Economics, Econometrics and Finance, with significant engagement in several subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Global and Planetary Change, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientific work of Andries F. Hof focuses on key topics such as:

  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Global Energy and Sustainability Research
  • Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure

The scholar frequently publishes in multiple well-known venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Nature Climate Change
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Environmental Research Communications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Communications

Among recent papers, there are several notable publications such as:

  • "The costs of achieving climate targets and the sources of uncertainty," 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • "Persistent inequality in economically optimal climate policies," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "A race to zero - Assessing the position of heavy industry in a global net-zero CO2 emissions context," 2021, Energy and Climate Change
  • "The role of regulatory, market and governance risk for electricity access investment in sub-Saharan Africa," 2021, Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development
  • "Actors and governance in the transition toward universal electricity access in Sub-Saharan Africa," 2020, Energy Policy

Collaboration is an essential part of their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Detlef P. van Vuuren
  • Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst
  • Vassilis Daioglou
  • Maarten van den Berg
  • Harmen Sytze de Boer

Best Publications

  • RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C

    Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Elke Stehfest;Michel G. J. den Elzen;Tom Kram

  • Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies

    Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Elke Stehfest;David E. H. J. Gernaat;David E. H. J. Gernaat;Maarten van den Berg

  • Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges

    Bruno Turnheim;Frans Berkhout;Frank W. Geels;Andries Hof;Andries Hof

  • Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs

    Jonathan C. Doelman;Jonathan C. Doelman;Elke Stehfest;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Andrzej Tabeau

  • Implications of various effort-sharing approaches for national carbon budgets and emission pathways

    Nicole J. van den Berg;Nicole J. van den Berg;Heleen L. van Soest;Heleen L. van Soest;Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;Michel G. J. den Elzen

  • Greenhouse gas emissions from current and enhanced policies of China until 2030: Can emissions peak before 2030?

    Michel den Elzen;Hanna Fekete;Niklas Höhne;Annemiek Admiraal

  • How well do integrated assessment models simulate climate change

    Detlef P. van Vuuren;Jason Lowe;Elke Stehfest;Laila Gohar

  • Adaptation in integrated assessment modeling: where do we stand?

    Anthony G. Patt;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Frans Berkhout;Asbjørn Aaheim

  • The use of scenarios as the basis for combined assessment of climate change mitigation and adaptation

    D.P. van Vuuren;M. Isaac;Z.W. Kundzewicz;Z.W. Kundzewicz;N. Arnell

  • Global and regional abatement costs of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and of enhanced action to levels well below 2 °C and 1.5 °C

    Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;Michel G.J. den Elzen;Annemiek Admiraal;Mark Roelfsema

  • Open discussion of negative emissions is urgently needed

    Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;Mariësse A. Â. E. van Sluisveld;Mariësse A. Â. E. van Sluisveld;Keywan Riahi

  • The Copenhagen Accord: abatement costs and carbon prices resulting from the submissions

    Michel G.J. den Elzen;Andries F. Hof;Angelica Mendoza Beltran;Giacomo Grassi

  • The role of decentralized systems in providing universal electricity access in Sub-Saharan Africa – A model-based approach

    Anteneh G. Dagnachew;Paul L. Lucas;Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;David E.H.J. Gernaat

  • Contribution of the G20 economies to the global impact of the Paris agreement climate proposals

    Michel den Elzen;Annemiek Admiraal;Mark Roelfsema;Heleen van Soest

  • Assessing the ambition of post-2020 climate targets: a comprehensive framework

    Niklas Höhne;Hanna Fekete;Michel G.J. den Elzen;Andries F. Hof

  • Allocating planetary boundaries to large economies : Distributional consequences of alternative perspectives on distributive fairness

    Paul L. Lucas;Paul L. Lucas;Harry C. Wilting;Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren

  • Analysing the costs and benefits of climate policy: Value judgements and scientific uncertainties

    Andries F. Hof;Michel G.J. den Elzen;Detlef P. van Vuuren

  • Scenario analysis for promoting clean cooking in Sub-Saharan Africa: Costs and benefits

    Anteneh G. Dagnachew;Anteneh G. Dagnachew;Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;Paul L. Lucas;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren

  • Improved modelling of lifestyle changes in Integrated Assessment Models: Cross-disciplinary insights from methodologies and theories

    Nicole J. van den Berg;Andries F. Hof;Lewis Akenji;Oreane Y. Edelenbosch;Oreane Y. Edelenbosch

  • The emissions gap between the Copenhagen pledges and the 2 °C climate goal: Options for closing and risks that could widen the gap

    Michel G.J. den Elzen;Andries F. Hof;Mark Roelfsema

  • Aligning integrated assessment modelling with socio-technical transition insights: an application to low-carbon energy scenario analysis in Europe

    Mariësse A.E. van Sluisveld;Mariësse A.E. van Sluisveld;Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;Samuel Carrara;Samuel Carrara;Samuel Carrara;Frank W. Geels

  • Copenhagen Accord Pledges imply higher costs for staying below 2°C warming

    Jasper van Vliet;Maarten van den Berg;Michiel Schaeffer;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren

  • Environmental effectiveness and economic consequences of fragmented versus universal regimes : What can we learn from model studies?

    Andries F. Hof;Michel G. J. den Elzen;Detlef P. van Vuuren

  • The effect of different mitigation strategies on international financing of adaptation

    A. F. Hof;K. C. de Bruin;R. B. Dellink;R. B. Dellink;M. G. J. den Elzen

Frequent Co-Authors

Detlef P. van Vuuren
Detlef P. van Vuuren Utrecht University
Michel G.J. den Elzen
Michel G.J. den Elzen Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
David E.H.J. Gernaat
David E.H.J. Gernaat Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Vassilis Daioglou
Vassilis Daioglou Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Elke Stehfest
Elke Stehfest Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Frans Berkhout
Frans Berkhout King's College London
Malte Meinshausen
Malte Meinshausen University of Melbourne
Bas J. van Ruijven
Bas J. van Ruijven International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Chris Hope
Chris Hope University of Cambridge
Anthony Patt
Anthony Patt ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your knowledge in Environmental Sciences can be enhanced by exploring related online degree programs that complement this field. For those interested in understanding societal impacts and human behavior, online bachelors degree programs in sociology offer valuable insights into social dynamics and environment-related issues.

For professionals aiming to advance their careers through leadership and research, accelerated options like 1 year phd programs online no dissertation provide a flexible pathway without the traditional dissertation hurdle, making it feasible to quickly enhance expertise.

If educational leadership is your goal, explore the best online eds to edd programs, which prepare graduates for high-level roles in academia and policy development with a focus on sustainability and environmental education.

Lastly, for professionals seeking advanced social work skills to drive community and environmental change, affordable options like dsw programs provide valuable career opportunities in advocacy and program development within environmental contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Andries F. Hof

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles