World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 43 7071 6795 178 172 110 7626

Andries F. Hof publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andries F. Hof between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andries F. Hof published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2020. 12 of the 129 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2020. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 6 publications
2004 2025

129 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andries F. Hof: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 0
2008 1
2009 4
2010 10
2011 8
2012 6
2013 7
2014 6
2015 12
2016 5
2017 6
2018 5
2019 5
2020 15
2021 11
2022 7
2023 6
2024 6
2025 6
Total 129
Download as CSV

Andries F. Hof publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andries F. Hof sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 110 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492 110
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Andries F. Hof D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andries F. Hof sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336 43
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Andries F. Hof is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Economics, Econometrics and Finance, with significant engagement in several subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Global and Planetary Change, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientific work of Andries F. Hof focuses on key topics such as:

  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Global Energy and Sustainability Research
  • Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure

The scholar frequently publishes in multiple well-known venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Nature Climate Change
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Environmental Research Communications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Communications

Among recent papers, there are several notable publications such as:

  • "The costs of achieving climate targets and the sources of uncertainty," 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • "Persistent inequality in economically optimal climate policies," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "A race to zero - Assessing the position of heavy industry in a global net-zero CO2 emissions context," 2021, Energy and Climate Change
  • "The role of regulatory, market and governance risk for electricity access investment in sub-Saharan Africa," 2021, Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development
  • "Actors and governance in the transition toward universal electricity access in Sub-Saharan Africa," 2020, Energy Policy

Collaboration is an essential part of their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Detlef P. van Vuuren
  • Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst
  • Vassilis Daioglou
  • Maarten van den Berg
  • Harmen Sytze de Boer

Best Publications

  • RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C

    Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Elke Stehfest;Michel G. J. den Elzen;Tom Kram

  • Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies

    Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Elke Stehfest;David E. H. J. Gernaat;David E. H. J. Gernaat;Maarten van den Berg

  • Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges

    Bruno Turnheim;Frans Berkhout;Frank W. Geels;Andries Hof;Andries Hof

  • Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs

    Jonathan C. Doelman;Jonathan C. Doelman;Elke Stehfest;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Andrzej Tabeau

  • Implications of various effort-sharing approaches for national carbon budgets and emission pathways

    Nicole J. van den Berg;Nicole J. van den Berg;Heleen L. van Soest;Heleen L. van Soest;Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;Michel G. J. den Elzen

  • Greenhouse gas emissions from current and enhanced policies of China until 2030: Can emissions peak before 2030?

    Michel den Elzen;Hanna Fekete;Niklas Höhne;Annemiek Admiraal

  • How well do integrated assessment models simulate climate change

    Detlef P. van Vuuren;Jason Lowe;Elke Stehfest;Laila Gohar

  • Adaptation in integrated assessment modeling: where do we stand?

    Anthony G. Patt;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Frans Berkhout;Asbjørn Aaheim

  • The use of scenarios as the basis for combined assessment of climate change mitigation and adaptation

    D.P. van Vuuren;M. Isaac;Z.W. Kundzewicz;Z.W. Kundzewicz;N. Arnell

  • Global and regional abatement costs of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and of enhanced action to levels well below 2 °C and 1.5 °C

    Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;Michel G.J. den Elzen;Annemiek Admiraal;Mark Roelfsema

  • Open discussion of negative emissions is urgently needed

    Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;Mariësse A. Â. E. van Sluisveld;Mariësse A. Â. E. van Sluisveld;Keywan Riahi

  • The Copenhagen Accord: abatement costs and carbon prices resulting from the submissions

    Michel G.J. den Elzen;Andries F. Hof;Angelica Mendoza Beltran;Giacomo Grassi

  • The role of decentralized systems in providing universal electricity access in Sub-Saharan Africa – A model-based approach

    Anteneh G. Dagnachew;Paul L. Lucas;Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;David E.H.J. Gernaat

  • Contribution of the G20 economies to the global impact of the Paris agreement climate proposals

    Michel den Elzen;Annemiek Admiraal;Mark Roelfsema;Heleen van Soest

  • Assessing the ambition of post-2020 climate targets: a comprehensive framework

    Niklas Höhne;Hanna Fekete;Michel G.J. den Elzen;Andries F. Hof

  • Allocating planetary boundaries to large economies : Distributional consequences of alternative perspectives on distributive fairness

    Paul L. Lucas;Paul L. Lucas;Harry C. Wilting;Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren

  • Analysing the costs and benefits of climate policy: Value judgements and scientific uncertainties

    Andries F. Hof;Michel G.J. den Elzen;Detlef P. van Vuuren

  • Scenario analysis for promoting clean cooking in Sub-Saharan Africa: Costs and benefits

    Anteneh G. Dagnachew;Anteneh G. Dagnachew;Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;Paul L. Lucas;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren

  • Improved modelling of lifestyle changes in Integrated Assessment Models: Cross-disciplinary insights from methodologies and theories

    Nicole J. van den Berg;Andries F. Hof;Lewis Akenji;Oreane Y. Edelenbosch;Oreane Y. Edelenbosch

  • The emissions gap between the Copenhagen pledges and the 2 °C climate goal: Options for closing and risks that could widen the gap

    Michel G.J. den Elzen;Andries F. Hof;Mark Roelfsema

  • Aligning integrated assessment modelling with socio-technical transition insights: an application to low-carbon energy scenario analysis in Europe

    Mariësse A.E. van Sluisveld;Mariësse A.E. van Sluisveld;Andries F. Hof;Andries F. Hof;Samuel Carrara;Samuel Carrara;Samuel Carrara;Frank W. Geels

  • Copenhagen Accord Pledges imply higher costs for staying below 2°C warming

    Jasper van Vliet;Maarten van den Berg;Michiel Schaeffer;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren

  • Environmental effectiveness and economic consequences of fragmented versus universal regimes : What can we learn from model studies?

    Andries F. Hof;Michel G. J. den Elzen;Detlef P. van Vuuren

  • The effect of different mitigation strategies on international financing of adaptation

    A. F. Hof;K. C. de Bruin;R. B. Dellink;R. B. Dellink;M. G. J. den Elzen

Frequent Co-Authors

Detlef P. van Vuuren
Detlef P. van Vuuren Utrecht University
Michel G.J. den Elzen
Michel G.J. den Elzen Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
David E.H.J. Gernaat
David E.H.J. Gernaat Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Vassilis Daioglou
Vassilis Daioglou Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Elke Stehfest
Elke Stehfest Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Frans Berkhout
Frans Berkhout King's College London
Malte Meinshausen
Malte Meinshausen University of Melbourne
Bas J. van Ruijven
Bas J. van Ruijven International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Chris Hope
Chris Hope University of Cambridge
Anthony Patt
Anthony Patt ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your knowledge in Environmental Sciences can be enhanced by exploring related online degree programs that complement this field. For those interested in understanding societal impacts and human behavior, online bachelors degree programs in sociology offer valuable insights into social dynamics and environment-related issues.

For professionals aiming to advance their careers through leadership and research, accelerated options like 1 year phd programs online no dissertation provide a flexible pathway without the traditional dissertation hurdle, making it feasible to quickly enhance expertise.

If educational leadership is your goal, explore the best online eds to edd programs, which prepare graduates for high-level roles in academia and policy development with a focus on sustainability and environmental education.

Lastly, for professionals seeking advanced social work skills to drive community and environmental change, affordable options like dsw programs provide valuable career opportunities in advocacy and program development within environmental contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Andries F. Hof

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles