World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 40 7322 7066 40 40 206 6476

Hugo A. Jakobsen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hugo A. Jakobsen between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hugo A. Jakobsen published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2012. 5 of the 216 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2012. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1992 2025

216 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hugo A. Jakobsen: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 1
1998 3
1999 1
2000 2
2001 4
2002 5
2003 1
2004 1
2005 4
2006 5
2007 9
2008 4
2009 17
2010 15
2011 15
2012 24
2013 12
2014 24
2015 11
2016 9
2017 10
2018 3
2019 5
2020 5
2021 11
2022 5
2023 2
2024 3
2025 2
Total 216
Download as CSV

Hugo A. Jakobsen publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugo A. Jakobsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 206 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403 206
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Hugo A. Jakobsen D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugo A. Jakobsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348 40
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Hugo A. Jakobsen is affiliated with the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Norway. Their research spans multiple fields including engineering and environmental science, with a notable focus on biomedical engineering, computational mechanics, and water science and technology as significant subfields of study.

The primary domains of their work encompass fluid dynamics and mixing, minerals flotation and separation techniques, innovative microfluidic and catalytic techniques innovation, particle dynamics in fluid flows, fluid dynamics and heat transfer, rheology and fluid dynamics studies, and fluid dynamics and thin films.

Jakobsen has published extensively across several scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets include Chemical Engineering Science, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, Default Digital Object Group, Chemical Engineering Science X, and Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.

Among recent notable papers are:

  • Single drop breakage in turbulent flow: Statistical data analysis (2020), Chemical Engineering Science X
  • Experimental investigation of single bubbles rising in stagnant liquid: Statistical analysis and image processing (2021), Physics of Fluids
  • Effect of surface viscoelasticity on the film drainage and the interfacial mobility (2020), International Journal of Multiphase Flow
  • On the prediction of coalescence and rebound of fluid particles: A film drainage study (2020), International Journal of Multiphase Flow
  • Experimental study of single bubble breakage in turbulent flow field: Evaluation of breakage models (2022), Chemical Engineering Science

Frequent collaborators include Jannike Solsvik, Nicolás La Forgia, Ida K. Kure, Suat Canberk Ozan, and Eirik Helno Herø.

Best Publications

  • Modeling of Vertical Bubble-Driven Flows

    Hugo A. Jakobsen;Bente H. Sannæs;Sverre Grevskott;Hallvard F. Svendsen

  • Modeling of Bubble Column Reactors: Progress and Limitations

    Hugo A. Jakobsen;and Håvard Lindborg;Carlos A. Dorao

  • Sorption enhanced hydrogen production by steam methane reforming using Li2ZrO3 as sorbent: Sorption kinetics and reactor simulation

    Esther Ochoa-Fernández;Hans Kristian Rusten;Hugo Atle Jakobsen;Magnus Rønning

  • Effect of viscosity on droplet-droplet collision outcome: Experimental study and numerical comparison

    Cecilie Gotaas;Pavel Havelka;Hugo A. Jakobsen;Hallvard F. Svendsen

  • A model for turbulent binary breakup of dispersed fluid particles

    Lars Hagesaether;Hugo A Jakobsen;Hallvard F Svendsen

  • Chemical Reactor Modeling

    Unknown

  • On the constitutive equations for fluid particle breakage

    Jannike Solsvik;Stian Tangen;Hugo A. Jakobsen

  • Practical validation of the two-fluid model applied to dense gas-solid flows in fluidized beds

    HÅvard Lindborg;Magne Lysberg;Hugo A. Jakobsen

  • Local flow structures in internal loop and bubble column reactors

    H.F. Svendsen;H.A. Jakobsen;R. Torvik

  • Single drop breakup experiments in stirred liquid–liquid tank

    Jannike Solsvik;Hugo A. Jakobsen

  • Hydrogen Production by Sorption-Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming Using Lithium Oxides as CO2-Acceptor

    Hans Kristian Rusten;Esther Ochoa-Fernández;Håvard Lindborg;and De Chen

  • Modeling of multicomponent mass diffusion in porous spherical pellets: Application to steam methane reforming and methanol synthesis

    Jannike Solsvik;Hugo A. Jakobsen

  • Derivation and validation of a binary multi-fluid Eulerian model for fluidized beds

    Zhongxi Chao;Yuefa Wang;Jana P. Jakobsen;Maria Fernandino

  • The Foundation of the Population Balance Equation: A Review

    Jannike Solsvik;Hugo A. Jakobsen

  • A regional scale multilayer model for the calculation of long‐term transport and deposition of air pollution in Europe

    Unknown

  • A least squares method for the solution of population balance problems

    Carlos Alberto Dorao;H. A. Jakobsen

  • Experimental studies and modeling of a fixed bed reactor for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis using biosyngas

    M.H. Rafiq;H.A. Jakobsen;R. Schmid;J.E. Hustad

  • Numerical Investigation of Sorption Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming Using Li2ZrO3 as CO2-acceptor

    Hans Kristian Rusten;Esther Ochoa-Fernandez;De Chen;Hugo Atle Jakobsen

  • Definition of the Single Drop Breakup Event

    Jannike Solsvik;Sebastian Maaß;Hugo A. Jakobsen

  • Development of Fluid Particle Breakup and Coalescence Closure Models for the Complete Energy Spectrum of Isotropic Turbulence

    Jannike Solsvik;Hugo A. Jakobsen

  • A numerical study of the interactions between viscous flow, transport and kinetics in fixed bed reactors

    Hugo A. Jakobsen;Håvard Lindborg;Vemund Handeland

  • A Review of the Statistical Turbulence Theory Required Extending the Population Balance Closure Models to the Entire Spectrum of Turbulence

    Jannike Solsvik;Hugo A. Jakobsen

  • Investigation of the particle–particle drag in a dense binary fluidized bed

    Zhongxi Chao;Yuefa Wang;Jana P. Jakobsen;Maria Fernandino

  • Chemical Reaction Engineering

    Hugo A. Jakobsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Hallvard F. Svendsen
Hallvard F. Svendsen Norwegian University of Science and Technology
De Chen
De Chen Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Dirk Lucas
Dirk Lucas Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
Johan E. Hustad
Johan E. Hustad Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Jorge Gascon
Jorge Gascon King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Bernhard Weigand
Bernhard Weigand University of Stuttgart
Miguel Menéndez
Miguel Menéndez University of Zaragoza
Anders Holmen
Anders Holmen Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Carlos Téllez
Carlos Téllez University of Zaragoza
Timothy F. L. McKenna
Timothy F. L. McKenna Claude Bernard University Lyon 1

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in broadening your career options within Engineering and Technology, there are a variety of online degrees worth considering. For those looking to gain in-demand business and leadership skills, pursuing an online project management degree can equip you for roles overseeing engineering projects, team coordination, and resource allocation.

Alternatively, exploring the intersection of technology and property markets, an online degree in real estate can open doors to careers in property management, development, or real estate technology.

If you’re passionate about how users interact with digital products, an online ux design degree offers skills in designing intuitive user interfaces and enhancing user experience, vital for technology-driven industries.

Still weighing your options? Find out if is project management a good degree, including career outlooks and potential salaries in this high-growth field.

Best Scientists Citing Hugo A. Jakobsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles