World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
46
Citations
8439
World Ranking
5144
National Ranking
161

Uwe Hampel publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uwe Hampel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 470 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Uwe Hampel D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uwe Hampel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Uwe Hampel is affiliated with the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf in Germany. Their research primarily falls within the field of Engineering, with a significant focus on subfields such as Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Aerospace Engineering, and Ocean Engineering.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
  • Flow Measurement and Analysis
  • Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
  • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
  • Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics

Uwe Hampel has contributed multiple recent papers, with representative examples being:

  • "The use of pure oxygen for aeration in aerobic wastewater treatment: A review of its potential and limitations" (2020) published in Bioresource Technology
  • "Preparation of γ-Al2O3/α-Al2O3 ceramic foams as catalyst carriers via the replica technique" (2020) in Catalysis Today
  • "A Review on Fast Tomographic Imaging Techniques and Their Potential Application in Industrial Process Control" (2022) published in Sensors
  • "Numerical optimization of a finned tube bundle heat exchanger arrangement for passive spent fuel pool cooling to ambient air" (2020) in Nuclear Engineering and Design
  • "Dynamics of bubble formation at micro-orifices under constant gas flow conditions" (2020) from International Journal of Multiphase Flow

The venues where this researcher frequently publishes include:

  • RODARE
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Chemie Ingenieur Technik
  • Sensors
  • Nuclear Engineering and Design

Frequent collaborators in their research work are:

  • Markus Schubert
  • Eckhard Schleicher
  • Sebastian Felix Reinecke
  • André Bieberle
  • Sebastian Unger

Best Publications

  • Capacitance wire-mesh sensor for fast measurement of phase fraction distributions

    M J Da Silva;E Schleicher;U Hampel

  • Photogrammetric techniques in civil engineering material testing and structure monitoring

    Hans-Gerd Maas;Uwe Hampel

  • An ultra fast electron beam x-ray tomography scanner

    F Fischer;D Hoppe;E Schleicher;G Mattausch

  • High-resolution gas–oil two-phase flow visualization with a capacitance wire-mesh sensor

    M.J. Da Silva;S. Thiele;L. Abdulkareem;B.J. Azzopardi

  • High resolution gamma ray tomography scanner for flow measurement and non-destructive testing applications.

    U. Hampel;A. Bieberle;D. Hoppe;J. Kronenberg

  • Ultra fast electron beam X-ray computed tomography for two-phase flow measurement

    F. Fischer;U. Hampel

  • Comparative study of gas–oil and gas–water two-phase flow in a vertical pipe

    L. Szalinski;L.A. Abdulkareem;M.J. Da Silva;S. Thiele

  • A new approach for evaluating bond capacity of TRC strengthening

    Regine Ortlepp;Uwe Hampel;Manfred Curbach

  • The use of pure oxygen for aeration in aerobic wastewater treatment: A review of its potential and limitations.

    G. Skouteris;G. Rodriguez-Garcia;S.F. Reinecke;U. Hampel;U. Hampel

  • Experimental investigation of the influence of column scale, gas density and liquid properties on gas holdup in bubble columns

    Philipp Rollbusch;Marc Becker;Martina Ludwig;Andrè Bieberle

  • Bubble dynamics in a 3‐D gas–solid fluidized bed using ultrafast electron beam X‐ray tomography and two‐fluid model

    Vikrant Vijay Verma;JT Johan Padding;NG Niels Deen;Jam Hans Kuipers

  • Comparative study of ultrafast X-ray tomography and wire-mesh sensors for vertical gas–liquid pipe flows

    Manuel Banowski;Matthias Beyer;Lutz Szalinski;Dirk Lucas

  • Bubble size and radial gas hold-up distributions in a slurry bubble column using ultrafast electron beam X-ray tomography

    Swapna Rabha;Markus Schubert;Michael Wagner;Dirk Lucas

  • Intrinsic flow behavior in a slurry bubble column: A study on the effect of particle size

    Swapna Rabha;Markus Schubert;Uwe Hampel;Uwe Hampel

  • Liquid flow texture analysis in trickle bed reactors using high-resolution gamma ray tomography

    Markus Schubert;Günther Hessel;Cornelius Zippe;Rüdiger Lange

  • An Experimental Study on the Gas Entrainment in Horizontally and Vertically Installed Centrifugal Pumps

    Martin Neumann;Thomas Schäfer;André Bieberle;Uwe Hampel;Uwe Hampel

  • Application of gamma-ray computed tomography for the analysis of gas holdup distributions in centrifugal pumps

    Thomas Schäfer;André Bieberle;Martin Neumann;Uwe Hampel;Uwe Hampel

  • Design of an optical tomograph for the investigation of single- and two-phase pipe flows

    E Schleicher;M J da Silva;S Thiele;A Li

  • Experimental ultra fast X-ray computed tomography with a linearly scanned electron beam source

    U. Hampel;M. Speck;D. Koch;H.-J. Menz

  • Ultrafast X-ray computed tomography for the analysis of gas–solid fluidized beds

    Martina Bieberle;Frank Barthel;Uwe Hampel

  • Application of high-resolution gamma ray tomography to the measurement of gas hold-up distributions in a stirred chemical reactor

    U. Hampel;H.V. Hristov;A. Bieberle;C. Zippe

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk Lucas
Dirk Lucas Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
Brenton S. McLaury
Brenton S. McLaury University of Tulsa
Siamack A. Shirazi
Siamack A. Shirazi University of Tulsa
Eckhard Krepper
Eckhard Krepper Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
Ryoichi Yamamoto
Ryoichi Yamamoto Kyoto University
Barry J. Azzopardi
Barry J. Azzopardi University of Nottingham
Eugeny Y. Kenig
Eugeny Y. Kenig University of Paderborn
Hans-Gerd Maas
Hans-Gerd Maas TU Dresden
JC Jaap Schouten
JC Jaap Schouten Eindhoven University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options in Engineering and Technology opens doors to numerous career opportunities and flexible learning paths. Many universities now offer 6 week college courses that allow students to upskill or fast-track their degree requirements at an accelerated pace.

Career pathways often go beyond core engineering fields. For those interested in the business side, consider a finance degree online or explore fast track mba programs—both ideal for aspiring leaders or entrepreneurs in technology sectors.

If you’re interested in legal or compliance roles within engineering firms or tech organizations, completing a paralegal accelerated program can broaden your career prospects. With these diverse online options, you can tailor your education to fit your professional goals and fast-track your journey in the ever-evolving world of Engineering and Technology.

Best Scientists Citing Uwe Hampel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles