World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
30630
World Ranking
14015
National Ranking
1296

Javier Zamora publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Javier Zamora sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 322 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Javier Zamora D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Javier Zamora sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Javier Zamora is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom and has published extensively in the field of medicine, with a particular focus on obstetrics and gynecology. Their research includes significant work in pediatrics, perinatology, public health, statistics, and epidemiology.

Their recent scholarly contributions include studies addressing COVID-19 impacts on pregnancy and diagnostic testing challenges. Notable publications include: Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, BMJ), False-negative results of initial RT-PCR assays for COVID-19: A systematic review (2020, PLoS ONE), FALSE-NEGATIVE RESULTS OF INITIAL RT-PCR ASSAYS FOR COVID-19: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (2020, bioRxiv), SARS-CoV-2 positivity in offspring and timing of mother-to-child transmission: living systematic review and meta-analysis (2022, BMJ), and Worldwide Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2021, Frontiers in Public Health).

Zamora has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Shakila Thangaratinam, Khalid S. Khan, Borja M. Fernández-Félix, John Allotey, and Alfonso Muriel.

Their work appears recurrently in publication venues such as BMJ Open, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, F1000Research, and Medicina de Familia SEMERGEN.

Zamora's research fields are mainly centered on medicine, with subfields emphasizing:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Epidemiology

The main research topics covered include:

  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Ovarian function and disorders

Best Publications

  • Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis.

    John Allotey;Elena Stallings;Mercedes Bonet;Magnus Yap

  • Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data

    Javier Zamora;Víctor Abraira;Alfonso Muriel;Khalid M. Khan

  • The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review

    Y.Y. Chan;K. Jayaprakasan;J. Zamora;J.G. Thornton

  • Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles

    Sesh Kamal Sunkara;Vivian Rittenberg;Nick Raine-Fenning;Siladitya Bhattacharya

  • False-negative results of initial RT-PCR assays for COVID-19: A systematic review.

    Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez;Diana Buitrago-Garcia;Daniel Simancas-Racines;Paula Zambrano-Achig

  • The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11

    Sharon Buckley;Jamie Coleman;Ian Davison;Khalid S Khan

  • Effect of diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy on gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes: meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials

    Ewelina Rogozinska;Nadine Marlin;Ana Pilar Betran;Arne Astrup

  • Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in asymptomatic newborn babies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Shakila Thangaratinam;Kiritrea Brown;Javier Zamora;Khalid S Khan

  • Cognitive, motor, behavioural and academic performances of children born preterm: a meta-analysis and systematic review involving 64 061 children

    J Allotey;J Zamora;F Cheong-See;M Kalidindi

  • Risk of maternal mortality in women with severe anaemia during pregnancy and post partum: a multilevel analysis

    Jahnavi Daru;Javier Zamora;Borja M Fernandez-Felix;Joshua Vogel

  • Correlation between pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with common low back pain.

    Francisco M. Kovacs;Víctor Abraira;Javier Zamora;María Teresa Gil del Real

  • A systematic review of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors.

    Julio Pascual;Javier Zamora;John D. Pirsch

  • Prognosis for the co-twin following single-twin death: a systematic review.

    Ssc Ong;J Zamora;KS Khan;Kilby

  • First-trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis involving 55,974 women

    L. Velauthar;L. Velauthar;M. N. Plana;M. Kalidindi;J. Zamora

  • Maternal and Perinatal Mortality and Complications Associated With Caesarean Section in Low-income and Middle-income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    S. Sobhy;D. Arroyo-Manzano;N. Murugesu;G. Karthikeyan

  • Epilepsy in Pregnancy and Reproductive Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Luz Viale;John Allotey;Fiona Cheong-See;David Arroyo-Manzano

  • Diagnostic accuracy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Tara J. Selman;Christopher Mann;Javier Zamora;Tracy-Louise Appleyard

  • Quantification of the type 2 diabetes risk in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 95,750 women.

    Girish Rayanagoudar;Amal A. Hashi;Javier Zamora;Khalid S. Khan

  • Minimum detectable and minimal clinically important changes for pain in patients with nonspecific neck pain

    Francisco M Kovacs;Víctor Abraira;Ana Royuela;Josep Corcoll

  • FALSE-NEGATIVE RESULTS OF INITIAL RT-PCR ASSAYS FOR COVID-19: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

    Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez;Diana Buitrago-Garcia;Daniel Simancas-Racines;Paula Zambrano-Achig

Frequent Co-Authors

Khalid S. Khan
Khalid S. Khan University of Granada
Santiago Moreno
Santiago Moreno Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
Ben Willem J. Mol
Ben Willem J. Mol Monash University
Rosa del Campo
Rosa del Campo Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Andrea C. Tricco
Andrea C. Tricco St. Michael's Hospital
Julio Pascual
Julio Pascual University of Cantabria
Rafael Cantón
Rafael Cantón Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria
Helena J. Teede
Helena J. Teede Monash University
Asma Khalil
Asma Khalil St George's, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t just mean becoming a doctor. A wide range of online degrees support different healthcare career pathways, making it easier than ever to enter or advance within the field. Many students interested in patient wellness pursue nutrition degrees online, opening doors to work in dietetics, public health, or wellness coaching.

For those interested in healthcare leadership and administration, accredited options such as top cahme accredited mha programs offer robust training for management positions in hospitals, clinics, and insurance companies.

Registered nurses aiming to expand their education without traditional requirements can benefit from rn to bsn no clinical hours programs. These enable working professionals to earn a BSN degree flexibly and fully online.

For advanced clinical roles, there are also opportunities to fast-track your studies with the shortest dnp programs. These programs help nurses reach the highest levels of practice and leadership efficiently.

Each of these online options offers unique advantages, catering to different interests and career goals within the evolving landscape of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Javier Zamora

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles