World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frederick L. Stoddard

Frederick L. Stoddard

Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Finland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
57
Citations
9813
World Ranking
1474
National Ranking
9

Frederick L. Stoddard publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick L. Stoddard sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 247 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Frederick L. Stoddard D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick L. Stoddard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Finland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Finland Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Finland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Finland Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Agriculture
  • Ecology

His primary areas of study are Agronomy, Vicia faba, Food science, Gliadin and Storage protein. In the subject of general Agronomy, his work in Pest control is often linked to Biochar, thereby combining diverse domains of study. His Vicia faba research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Vernalization, Stomatal conductance, Plant breeding, Single-nucleotide polymorphism and Drought tolerance.

His study looks at the relationship between Food science and topics such as Glutenin, which overlap with Gluten. His work deals with themes such as Prolamin, Mixing, Viscosity, Shear and Wheat flour, which intersect with Gliadin. His Mixing research incorporates themes from Molecular size, Fractionation and Molecular mass.

His most cited work include:

  • Effect of Varying Protein Content and Glutenin-to-Gliadin Ratio on the Functional Properties of Wheat Dough (186 citations)
  • Screening techniques and sources of resistance to abiotic stresses in cool-season food legumes (126 citations)
  • Survey of Starch Particle-Size Distribution in Wheat and Related Species (120 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Agronomy, Vicia faba, Cultivar, Horticulture and Botany. His Agronomy study combines topics in areas such as Biomass, Bioenergy and Cropping. His Vicia faba study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Genetics, Pollination, Stomatal conductance, Plant breeding and Mediterranean climate.

The concepts of his Cultivar study are interwoven with issues in Growing season, Sowing, Gene–environment interaction, Lupinus and Monogastric. He focuses mostly in the field of Botany, narrowing it down to matters related to Starch and, in some cases, Poaceae, Endosperm and Ploidy. His study in the fields of Gliadin under the domain of Food science overlaps with other disciplines such as Composition.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (50.00%)
  • Vicia faba (23.31%)
  • Cultivar (23.31%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Agronomy (50.00%)
  • Vicia faba (23.31%)
  • Crop (12.71%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Frederick L. Stoddard spends much of his time researching Agronomy, Vicia faba, Crop, Agroforestry and Agriculture. His study in Agronomy is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Bioenergy and Subarctic climate. His Vicia faba research incorporates elements of Genetics, Cultivar and Germplasm.

His study in Yield extends to Cultivar with its themes. His Crop study incorporates themes from Gene Discovery, Biotechnology and Nutrient. His Cropping study, which is part of a larger body of work in Agriculture, is frequently linked to Business and Ecosystem services, bridging the gap between disciplines.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The future of lupin as a protein crop in Europe (104 citations)
  • Grain Legume Production and Use in European Agricultural Systems (69 citations)
  • Grain legume decline and potential recovery in European agriculture: a review (64 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agriculture
  • Botany
  • Ecology

His primary areas of investigation include Agronomy, Vicia faba, Crop, Cropping and Vicine. His study of Cropping system is a part of Agronomy. His Vicia faba research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Quantitative trait locus, Genetics and Gene.

His work on Protein crop as part of general Crop research is often related to Remote sensing, thus linking different fields of science. As a part of the same scientific study, he usually deals with the Cropping, concentrating on Arable land and frequently concerns with Agroforestry and Legume. His Molecular marker research focuses on Food safety and how it relates to Cultivar.

Best Publications

  • The future of lupin as a protein crop in Europe

    M. Mercedes Lucas;Frederick L. Stoddard;Paolo Annicchiarico;Juana Frias

  • Grain Legume Production and Use in European Agricultural Systems

    Christine A. Watson;Christine A. Watson;Moritz Reckling;Sara Preissel;Johann Bachinger

  • Integrated pest management in faba bean.

    F. Stoddard;Adrián H. Nicholas;Diego Rubiales;Jane Thomas

  • Effect of Varying Protein Content and Glutenin-to-Gliadin Ratio on the Functional Properties of Wheat Dough

    S. Uthayakumaran;P. W. Gras;P. W. Gras;F. L. Stoddard;F. Bekes

  • Faba bean breeding for drought-affected environments: a physiological and agronomic perspective

    H.R. Khan;J.G. Paull;Kadambot Siddique;F.L. Stoddard

  • Screening techniques and sources of resistance to abiotic stresses in cool-season food legumes

    FL Stoddard;C Balko;William Erskine;HR Khan

  • Grain legume decline and potential recovery in European agriculture: a review

    Peter Zander;T. S. Amjath-Babu;Sara Preissel;Moritz Reckling

  • The EU’s dependency on soya bean import for the animal feed industry and potential for EU produced alternatives

    Cornelis Leonardus Maria de Visser;Remco Schreuder;Frederick Stoddard

  • Short-term effects of biochar on soil properties and wheat yield formation with meat bone meal and inorganic fertiliser on a boreal loamy sand

    Priit Tammeorg;Asko Simojoki;Pirjo Mäkelä;Frederick L. Stoddard

  • A cropping system assessment framework - evaluating effects of introducing legumes into crop rotations

    Moritz Reckling;Jens Martin Hecker;Göran Bergkvist;Christine A. Watson;Christine A. Watson

  • Trade-offs between economic and environmental impacts of introducing legumes into cropping systems

    Moritz Reckling;Göran Bergkvist;Christine A. Watson;Christine A. Watson;Frederick L. Stoddard

  • Evaluation of physiological traits for improving drought tolerance in faba bean (Vicia faba L.)

    Habib ur Rahman Khan;W. Link;T. J. Hocking;F. L. Stoddard

  • Winter hardiness in faba bean: Physiology and breeding

    W. Link;Christiane Balko;F. L. Stoddard

  • Survey of Starch Particle-Size Distribution in Wheat and Related Species

    F. L. Stoddard

  • Biochar application to a fertile sandy clay loam in boreal conditions: effects on soil properties and yield formation of wheat, turnip rape and faba bean

    Priit Tammeorg;Asko Simojoki;Pirjo Mäkelä;Frederick L. Stoddard

  • The giant diploid faba genome unlocks variation in a global protein crop

    Unknown

  • The FIGS (focused identification of germplasm strategy) approach identifies traits related to drought adaptation in Vicia faba genetic resources.

    Hamid Khazaei;Kenneth Street;Abdallah Bari;Michael Mackay

  • Basic Rheology of Bread Dough with Modified Protein Content and Glutenin-to-Gliadin Ratios

    S. Uthayakumaran;S. Uthayakumaran;M. Newberry;M. Newberry;M. Keentok;M. Keentok;F. L. Stoddard;F. L. Stoddard

  • Faba bean flavour and technological property improvement by thermal pre-treatments

    Zhongqing Jiang;Marjo Johanna Pulkkinen;Yujie Wang;Anna-Maija Lampi

  • Eliminating vicine and convicine, the main anti-nutritional factors restricting faba bean usage

    Hamid Khazaei;Randy W. Purves;Randy W. Purves;Jessa Hughes;Wolfgang Link

  • Physiology of flowering and grain filling in faba bean

    J.W. Patrick;F.L. Stoddard

  • A SNP-based consensus genetic map for synteny-based trait targeting in faba bean (Vicia faba L.)

    Anne Webb;Amanda Cottage;Thomas Wood;Khalil Khamassi

  • Evaluation of the 40 mg Swelling Test for Measuring Starch Functionality

    Christine M. Konik-Rose;Ray Moss;Sadiq Rahman;Rudi Appels

Frequent Co-Authors

Christine A. Watson
Christine A. Watson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Frank Békés
Frank Békés Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Göran Bergkvist
Göran Bergkvist Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Donal M. O'Sullivan
Donal M. O'Sullivan University of Reading
Kristina Lindström
Kristina Lindström University of Helsinki
Albert Vandenberg
Albert Vandenberg University of Saskatchewan
Helinä Hartikainen
Helinä Hartikainen University of Helsinki
Stig Uggerhøj Andersen
Stig Uggerhøj Andersen Aarhus University
Alan H. Schulman
Alan H. Schulman University of Helsinki
Diego Rubiales
Diego Rubiales Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Frederick L. Stoddard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles