World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 54 4949 4550 414 391 168 9760

Markus Kipp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Markus Kipp between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Markus Kipp published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2025. 29 of the 203 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2025. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 21 publications
2006 2025

203 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Markus Kipp: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 2
2008 2
2009 11
2010 5
2011 12
2012 17
2013 9
2014 3
2015 10
2016 17
2017 16
2018 10
2019 15
2020 11
2021 10
2022 14
2023 9
2024 8
2025 21
Total 203
Download as CSV

Markus Kipp publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Kipp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383 168
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Markus Kipp D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Kipp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392 54
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Markus Kipp is a researcher primarily affiliated with the University of Rostock in Germany. Their work spans multiple disciplines, with a strong focus on neuroscience and medicine. Within these fields, Kipp has contributed significantly to subfields including neurology, molecular biology, developmental neuroscience, immunology, and pathology and forensic medicine.

The scientist's research encompasses several interconnected topics. Key areas include neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, research related to multiple sclerosis, as well as studies on immune cells in cancer, immune response and inflammation, peripheral neuropathies and disorders, and the biology of S100 proteins and annexins.

Kipp has published extensively, with notable papers including:

  • The Cuprizone Model: Dos and Do Nots (2020, Cells)
  • Translocator protein is a marker of activated microglia in rodent models but not human neurodegenerative diseases (2023, Nature Communications)
  • Enhanced axonal response of mitochondria to demyelination offers neuroprotection: implications for multiple sclerosis (2020, Acta Neuropathologica)
  • Different Methods for Evaluating Microglial Activation Using Anti-Ionized Calcium-Binding Adaptor Protein-1 Immunohistochemistry in the Cuprizone Model (2022, Cells)
  • Motor Behavioral Deficits in the Cuprizone Model: Validity of the Rotarod Test Paradigm (2022, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)

Frequent co-authors contributing to Kipp's research include Sarah Joost, Jiangshan Zhan, Hannes Kaddatz, Jonas Keiler, and Linda Frintrop. Their collaboration reflects a network of researchers focused on related scientific questions within Kipp's scope of study.

Kipp's publications have appeared mainly in journals such as:

  • Cells
  • Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Glia
  • Journal of Neuroinflammation

This publication pattern indicates an emphasis on journals dedicated to cellular biology, anatomical studies, molecular science, and neuroinflammatory research.

The scientific contributions of Markus Kipp reflect sustained engagement in topics critical to understanding the mechanisms underlying neurological diseases and immune responses. This includes detailed experimental studies using models relevant for demyelination and neurodegeneration, with implications for conditions such as multiple sclerosis.

Best Publications

  • The cuprizone animal model: new insights into an old story

    Markus Kipp;Tim Clarner;Jon Dang;Sjef Copray

  • Oligodendrocyte-microglia cross-talk in the central nervous system

    Laura Peferoen;Markus Kipp;Paul van der Valk;Johannes M. van Noort

  • Astrocytes regulate myelin clearance through recruitment of microglia during cuprizone-induced demyelination

    Thomas Skripuletz;Diane Hackstette;Katharina Bauer;Viktoria Gudi

  • Oxidative stress in multiple sclerosis: Central and peripheral mode of action.

    Kim Ohl;Klaus Tenbrock;Markus Kipp

  • Multiple sclerosis animal models: a clinical and histopathological perspective

    Markus Kipp;Stella Nyamoya;Tanja Hochstrasser;Sandra Amor

  • Clusters of activated microglia in normal-appearing white matter show signs of innate immune activation

    Jack van Horssen;Shailender Singh;Shailender Singh;Susanne van der Pol;Markus Kipp;Markus Kipp

  • 17β‐estradiol and progesterone prevent cuprizone provoked demyelination of corpus callosum in male mice

    Peter Acs;Markus Kipp;Akvile Norkute;Sonja Johann

  • Activation and Regulation of NLRP3 Inflammasome by Intrathecal Application of SDF-1a in a Spinal Cord Injury Model

    Adib Zendedel;Adib Zendedel;Sonja Johann;Soraya Mehrabi;Mohammad-taghi Joghataei

  • Myelin debris regulates inflammatory responses in an experimental demyelination animal model and multiple sclerosis lesions.

    Tim Clarner;Felix Diederichs;Katharina Berger;Bernd Denecke

  • In vitro and in vivo models of multiple sclerosis

    Baukje J. van der Star;Daphne Y.S. Vogel;Markus Kipp;Fabiola Puentes

  • Translocator protein is a marker of activated microglia in rodent models but not human neurodegenerative diseases

    Unknown

  • Sulforaphane suppresses LPS-induced inflammation in primary rat microglia

    Lars-Ove Brandenburg;Lars-Ove Brandenburg;Markus Kipp;Ralph Lucius;Thomas Pufe

  • CXCL10 Triggers Early Microglial Activation in the Cuprizone Model

    Tim Clarner;Katharina Janssen;Lara Nellessen;Martin Stangel

  • The Cuprizone Model: Dos and Do Nots

    Jiangshan Zhan;Teresa Mann;Sarah Joost;Newshan Behrangi

  • Gonadal steroids prevent cell damage and stimulate behavioral recovery after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in male and female rats

    Jon Dang;Bhimashankar Mitkari;Markus Kipp;Cordian Beyer

  • TTC staining of damaged brain areas after MCA occlusion in the rat does not constrict quantitative gene and protein analyses.

    Martin Kramer;Jon Dang;Fabian Baertling;Bernd Denecke

  • Inflammatory Response and Chemokine Expression in the White Matter Corpus Callosum and Gray Matter Cortex Region During Cuprizone-Induced Demyelination

    J. P. Buschmann;K. Berger;H. Awad;T. Clarner

  • Experimental in vivo and in vitro models of multiple sclerosis: EAE and beyond

    Markus Kipp;Markus Kipp;Baukje van der Star;Daphne Y.S. Vogel;Fabìola Puentes

  • Cuprizone treatment induces demyelination and astrocytosis in the mouse hippocampus.

    Akvile Norkute;Andrea Hieble;Alena Braun;Sonja Johann

  • Impact of sex steroids on neuroinflammatory processes and experimental multiple sclerosis.

    Markus Kipp;Cordian Beyer

  • Pathology of Multiple Sclerosis

    Markus Kipp;Paul van der Valk;Sandra Amor

  • Phagocytosis of neuronal debris by microglia is associated with neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis.

    Ruth Huizinga;Baukje J. van der Star;Markus Kipp;Markus Kipp;Rosa Jong

Frequent Co-Authors

Cordian Beyer
Cordian Beyer RWTH Aachen University
Sandra Amor
Sandra Amor University of Amsterdam
Paul van der Valk
Paul van der Valk Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
David Baker
David Baker University of Washington
Rolf Rossaint
Rolf Rossaint RWTH Aachen University
Martin Stangel
Martin Stangel Hannover Medical School
Bert A. 't Hart
Bert A. 't Hart University of Amsterdam
Gareth Pryce
Gareth Pryce Queen Mary University of London
Wolfgang Baumgärtner
Wolfgang Baumgärtner University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Matthias Brendel
Matthias Brendel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience offers a wide range of interdisciplinary career options. Students often seek out related degrees to broaden their expertise and job opportunities. Many choose to pursue further education that complements neuroscience, such as social work or psychology, to work in healthcare or research settings.

For those interested in community care or mental health, consider the most affordable msw programs online. These programs help future professionals understand social dynamics and interventions, vital for holistic patient care. If you want to fast-track your education, many schools now offer online msw programs that can be completed more quickly than traditional routes.

Those who wish to support individuals with behavioral challenges might be interested in bcba programs—an increasingly vital field connected to neuroscience, psychology, and education. Additionally, an online psychology education remains a versatile choice; discover your options among the best psychology degree online offerings.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Kipp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles