World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
37
Citations
5528
World Ranking
2393
National Ranking
82

Eckhard Krepper publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eckhard Krepper sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 150 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Eckhard Krepper D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eckhard Krepper sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • CFD modelling of subcooled boiling—Concept, validation and application to fuel assembly design

    Unknown

  • The inhomogeneous MUSIG model for the simulation of polydispersed flows

    Eckhard Krepper;Dirk Lucas;Thomas Frank;Horst-Michael Prasser

  • VALIDATION OF CFD MODELS FOR MONO- AND POLYDISPERSE AIR-WATER TWO-PHASE FLOWS IN PIPES

    Th. Frank;P.J. Zwart;E. Krepper;H.-M. Prasser

  • CFD modeling of bubble-induced turbulence

    Unknown

  • On the modelling of bubbly flow in vertical pipes

    Eckhard Krepper;Dirk Lucas;Horst-Michael Prasser

  • Development of co-current air–water flow in a vertical pipe

    D. Lucas;E. Krepper;H.-M. Prasser

  • Baseline closure model for dispersed bubbly flow: Bubble coalescence and breakup

    Yixiang Liao;Roland Rzehak;Dirk Lucas;Eckhard Krepper

  • Use of models for lift, wall and turbulent dispersion forces acting on bubbles for poly-disperse flows

    D. Lucas;E. Krepper;H.-M. Prasser

  • Evolution of the two-phase flow in a vertical tube—decomposition of gas fraction profiles according to bubble size classes using wire-mesh sensors

    Horst-Michael Prasser;Eckhard Krepper;Dirk Lucas

  • CFD for subcooled flow boiling: Simulation of DEBORA experiments

    Unknown

  • A multi-field two-fluid concept for transitions between different scales of interfacial structures

    Susann Hänsch;Dirk Lucas;Eckhard Krepper;Thomas Höhne

  • Prediction of radial gas profiles in vertical pipe flow on the basis of bubble size distribution

    Dirk Lucas;Eckhard Krepper;Horst-Michael Prasser

  • CFD for subcooled flow boiling: Coupling wall boiling and population balance models

    Unknown

  • Passive Safety Systems and Natural Circulation in Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants

    Unknown

  • CFD simulation of convective flow boiling of refrigerant in a vertical annulus

    Unknown

  • Bubble-induced turbulence: Comparison of CFD models

    Unknown

  • Unified modeling of bubbly flows in pipes, bubble columns, and airlift columns

    Roland Rzehak;Thomas Ziegenhein;Sebastian Kriebitzsch;Eckhard Krepper

  • Development of a generalized coalescence and breakup closure for the inhomogeneous MUSIG model

    Yixiang Liao;Dirk Lucas;Eckhard Krepper;Martin Schmidtke

  • Comparative study of wall-force models for the simulation of bubbly flows

    Unknown

  • Closure models for turbulent bubbly flows: A CFD study

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk Lucas
Dirk Lucas Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
Uwe Hampel
Uwe Hampel Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
Guan Heng Yeoh
Guan Heng Yeoh University of New South Wales
Jiyuan Tu
Jiyuan Tu RMIT University
Yassin A. Hassan
Yassin A. Hassan Texas A&M University
Jochen Zschau
Jochen Zschau Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in fields related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, there are diverse online degrees and career options to explore. Many veterans find specialized programs appealing, such as military friendly online speech pathology degree programs, which offer flexible learning tailored to unique experiences.

Accelerated degree options are also gaining popularity. Programs like the 5 year speech pathology programs provide efficient pathways for students eager to enter the workforce sooner without compromising educational quality.

Beyond traditional engineering roles, understanding career prospects and salary expectations is crucial. For example, interested students can learn more about professions such as forensic profiling, including detailed insights on forensic profiler salary and job outlook, which highlight the dynamic nature of technical careers.

Additionally, exploring various degree options can help align personal goals with career demands. Resources explaining the types of therapist degrees offer valuable guidance, demonstrating the broad spectrum of specialized education paths available today.

Best Scientists Citing Eckhard Krepper

Recently Published Articles