World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
48
Citations
8749
World Ranking
4574
National Ranking
1315

Cem Sarica publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cem Sarica sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 279 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Cem Sarica D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cem Sarica sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cem Sarica is affiliated with the University of Tulsa in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on engineering disciplines with a significant contribution to the subfields of ocean engineering, biomedical engineering, computational mechanics, mechanics of materials, and analytical chemistry.

The scientist's research topics cover a broad range of subjects, including:

  • Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
  • Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
  • Petroleum Processing and Analysis
  • Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
  • Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques

Cem Sarica has published extensively, with a notable presence in several scientific venues. The frequent publication venues include:

  • SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
  • Geoenergy Science and Engineering
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
  • Fuel

Some of the recent papers authored by or involving Cem Sarica include:

  • Wax deposition mechanisms: Is the current description sufficient? (2020, Fuel)
  • Thermal methods in flow assurance: A review (2021, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering)
  • Experimental Investigation of active heating in removal of wax deposits (2021, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering)
  • Dynamic Microscopic Study of Wax Deposition: Particulate Deposition (2021, Energy & Fuels)
  • Experimental study of pseudo-slug flow in upward inclined pipes (2020, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering)

Cem Sarica has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Eduardo Pereyra
  • Nagu Daraboina
  • Yilin Fan
  • Gabriel Santos
  • Auzan Soedarmo

The scope of Cem Sarica's work integrates experimental, analytical, and computational approaches to address engineering challenges related to fluid dynamics, drilling processes, and petroleum engineering. Their interdisciplinary research spans both fundamental studies and applied technologies within their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • A Comprehensive Mechanistic Model for Upward Two-Phase Flow in Wellbores

    A.M. Ansari;N.D. Sylvester;C. Sarica;O. Shoham

  • Unified model for gas-liquid pipe flow via slug dynamics: Part 1: Model development

    Hong-Quan Zhang;Qian Wang;Cem Sarica;James P. Brill

  • A Study of Oil-Water Flow Patterns in Horizontal Pipes

    J. L. Trallero;Cem Sarica;James P. Brill

  • A unified mechanistic model for slug liquid holdup and transition between slug and dispersed bubble flows

    Hong-Quan Zhang;Qian Wang;Cem Sarica;James P. Brill

  • Influence of Pressure Drop Along the Wellbore on Horizontal-Well Productivity

    Erdal Ozkan;Cem Sarica;Marc Haci

  • Effect of Conductivity on Horizontal Well Pressure Behavior

    Erdal Ozkan;Cem Sarica;Mustafa Haciislamoglu;Rajagopal Raghavan

  • An Efficient Drift-Flux Closure Relationship to Estimate Liquid Holdups of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes

    Jinho Choi;Eduardo Pereyra;Cem Sarica;Changhyup Park

  • Effect of the Flow Field on the Wax Deposition and Performance of Wax Inhibitors: Cold Finger and Flow Loop Testing

    Yuandao Chi;Nagu Daraboina;Cem Sarica

  • Unified Model for Gas-Liquid Pipe Flow via Slug Dynamics—Part 2: Model Validation

    Hong-Quan Zhang;Qian Wang;Cem Sarica;James P. Brill

  • Assessment and Development of Heavy Oil Viscosity Correlations

    Hossain;C. Sarica;H.-Q. Zhang;L. Rhyne

  • An Investigation of Two-Phase Oil/Water Paraffin Deposition

    Guilherme H. Couto;Hong Chen;Emmanuel Delle-case;Cem Sarica

  • Investigation of inhibitors efficacy in wax deposition mitigation using a laboratory scale flow loop

    Yuandao Chi;Nagu Daraboina;Cem Sarica

  • Review of Paraffin Deposition Research under Multiphase Flow Conditions

    Cem Sarica;Ekarit Panacharoensawad

  • Liquid Entrainment in Annular Gas/Liquid Flow in Inclined Pipes

    K.L. Magrini;Cem Sarica;Abdelsalam Al-Sarkhi;Hong-Quan Zhang

  • CHARACTERIZATION OF OIL-WATER FLOW PATTERNS IN VERTICAL AND DEVIATED WELLS

    Jose G. Flores;X. Tom Chen;Cem Sarica;James P. Brill

  • Mechanistic Modeling of Two-Phase Flow in Deviated Wells

    A.S. Kaya;C. Sarica;J.P. Brill

  • Improvements in Single-Phase Paraffin Deposition Modeling

    O.C. Hernandez;H. Hensley;C. Sarica;J.P. Brill

  • Investigation of slug flow characteristics in the valley of a hilly-terrain pipeline

    E. Al-Safran;C. Sarica;H.-Q. Zhang;J. Brill

  • Wax deposition mechanisms: Is the current description sufficient?

    Jinghao Yang;Yingda Lu;Nagu Daraboina;Cem Sarica

  • A simplified transient model for pipeline-riser systems

    C. Sarica;O. Shoham

  • A Critical Review of Controlling Paraffin Deposition in Production Lines Using Chemicals

    Yuandao Chi;Jinghao Yang;Cem Sarica;Nagu Daraboina

  • A study of oil-water flow patterns in horizontal pipes

    J.L. Trallero;S.A. Intevep;C. Sarica;J.P. Brill

Frequent Co-Authors

James P. Brill
James P. Brill University of Tulsa
Erdal Ozkan
Erdal Ozkan Colorado School of Mines
Turgay Ertekin
Turgay Ertekin Pennsylvania State University
Ovadia Shoham
Ovadia Shoham University of Tulsa
Uwe Hampel
Uwe Hampel Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
Rajagopal Raghavan
Rajagopal Raghavan Phillips 66 (United States)
Yehuda Taitel
Yehuda Taitel Tel Aviv University
Qiuwang Wang
Qiuwang Wang Xi'an Jiaotong University
Stefan Z. Miska
Stefan Z. Miska University of Tulsa
Rached Ben-Mansour
Rached Ben-Mansour King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Cem Sarica

Trending Scientists