World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
10351
World Ranking
6145
National Ranking
2683

Dustin J. Tyler publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dustin J. Tyler sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 133 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Dustin J. Tyler D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dustin J. Tyler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Dustin J. Tyler is affiliated with Case Western Reserve University in the United States. Their research spans the fields of neuroscience and engineering, with a strong emphasis on biomedical engineering and cognitive neuroscience as key subfields. The scope of their work also includes cellular and molecular neuroscience, neurology, and surgery.

The scientist's research topics primarily focus on muscle activation and electromyography studies, neuroscience and neural engineering, and EEG and brain-computer interfaces. Additional areas of study include tactile and sensory interactions, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, advanced sensor and energy harvesting materials, and motor control and adaptation.

Notable recent publications by Dustin J. Tyler include:

  • Toward higher-performance bionic limbs for wider clinical use, 2021, Nature Biomedical Engineering
  • Restoration of sensory information via bionic hands, 2020, Nature Biomedical Engineering
  • Ambulatory searching task reveals importance of somatosensation for lower-limb amputees, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Reconnecting the Hand and Arm to the Brain: Efficacy of Neural Interfaces for Sensorimotor Restoration After Tetraplegia, 2023, Neurosurgery
  • Stable, simultaneous and proportional 4-DoF prosthetic hand control via synergy-inspired linear interpolation: a case series, 2021, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Their work has appeared frequently in several publication venues, including:

  • Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Dustin J. Tyler has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, most notably:

  • Emily L. Graczyk
  • Ronald J. Triolo
  • Jeremy Dunning
  • Gilles Pinault
  • Benjamin J. Alexander

The scientist has been recognized by being named a Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Stimuli-Responsive Polymer Nanocomposites Inspired by the Sea Cucumber Dermis

    Jeffrey R. Capadona;Kadhiravan Shanmuganathan;Dustin J. Tyler;Stuart J. Rowan

  • A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception.

    Daniel W. Tan;Daniel W. Tan;Matthew A. Schiefer;Matthew A. Schiefer;Michael W. Keith;Michael W. Keith;Michael W. Keith;James Robert Anderson;James Robert Anderson;James Robert Anderson

  • Corrugated inter-fascicular nerve cuff method and apparatus

    Dustin J. Tyler;Dominique M. Durand

  • Functionally selective peripheral nerve stimulation with a flat interface nerve electrode

    D.J. Tyler;D.M. Durand

  • A versatile approach for the processing of polymer nanocomposites with self-assembled nanofibre templates

    Jeffrey R. Capadona;Otto Van Den Berg;Lynn A. Capadona;Michael Schroeter

  • Mechanically-compliant intracortical implants reduce the neuroinflammatory response

    Jessica K Nguyen;Jessica K Nguyen;Daniel J Park;John L Skousen;Allison E Hess-Dunning

  • Sensory feedback by peripheral nerve stimulation improves task performance in individuals with upper limb loss using a myoelectric prosthesis.

    Matthew Schiefer;Daniel Tan;Daniel Tan;Steven M Sidek;Steven M Sidek;Dustin J Tyler;Dustin J Tyler;Dustin J Tyler

  • The neural basis of perceived intensity in natural and artificial touch

    Emily L. Graczyk;Matthew A. Schiefer;Hannes P. Saal;Benoit P. Delhaye

  • Toward higher-performance bionic limbs for wider clinical use

    Dario Farina;Ivan Vujaklija;Rickard Brånemark;Rickard Brånemark;Anthony M J Bull

  • Restoration of sensory information via bionic hands.

    Sliman J. Bensmaia;Dustin J. Tyler;Dustin J. Tyler;Silvestro Micera;Silvestro Micera

  • Mechanically adaptive intracortical implants improve the proximity of neuronal cell bodies

    J. P. Harris;J. P. Harris;Jeffrey B. Capadona;Jeffrey B. Capadona;Robert H Miller;B. C. Healy

  • Home Use of a Neural-connected Sensory Prosthesis Provides the Functional and Psychosocial Experience of Having a Hand Again.

    Emily L. Graczyk;Linda Resnik;Matthew A. Schiefer;Matthew A. Schiefer;Melissa S. Schmitt

  • Systems and methods for performing prosthetic or therapeutic neuromuscular stimulation using a programmable universal external controller

    Zi-Ping Fang;Geoffrey Thrope;Anthony Ignagni;Soheyl Pourmehdi

  • Stability and selectivity of a chronic, multi-contact cuff electrode for sensory stimulation in human amputees

    Daniel W Tan;Daniel W Tan;Matthew A Schiefer;Matthew A Schiefer;Michael W Keith;Michael W Keith;J Robert Anderson;J Robert Anderson

  • Flat interface nerve electrode and a method for use

    Dustin Tyler;Dominique M. Durand

  • In vivo deployment of mechanically adaptive nanocomposites for intracortical microelectrodes

    J. P. Harris;J. P. Harris;Andreas E. Hess;Stuart J. Rowan;Stuart J. Rowan;Christoph Weder;Christoph Weder

  • Chronic response of the rat sciatic nerve to the flat interface nerve electrode.

    Dustin J Tyler;Dominique M Durand

  • A Model of Selective Activation of the Femoral Nerve With a Flat Interface Nerve Electrode for a Lower Extremity Neuroprosthesis

    M.A. Schiefer;R.J. Triolo;D.J. Tyler

  • Stimulation Stability and Selectivity of Chronically Implanted Multicontact Nerve Cuff Electrodes in the Human Upper Extremity

    K.H. Polasek;H.A. Hoyen;M.W. Keith;R.F. Kirsch

  • Fascicular Perineurium Thickness, Size, and Position Affect Model Predictions of Neural Excitation

    Y. Grinberg;M.A. Schiefer;D.J. Tyler;K.J. Gustafson

  • Selective stimulation of the human femoral nerve with a flat interface nerve electrode

    M A Schiefer;K H Polasek;R J Triolo;R J Triolo;G C J Pinault

Frequent Co-Authors

Christoph Weder
Christoph Weder University of Fribourg
Stuart J. Rowan
Stuart J. Rowan University of Chicago
Dominique Durand
Dominique Durand Case Western Reserve University
Christian A. Zorman
Christian A. Zorman Case Western Reserve University
Sliman J. Bensmaia
Sliman J. Bensmaia University of Chicago
Leigh R. Hochberg
Leigh R. Hochberg Harvard University
Lee E. Miller
Lee E. Miller Northwestern University
Kevin L. Kilgore
Kevin L. Kilgore Case Western Reserve University
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Kingman P. Strohl
Kingman P. Strohl Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Dustin J. Tyler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles