World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
12836
World Ranking
3689
National Ranking
1692

Sliman J. Bensmaia publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sliman J. Bensmaia sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 161 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sliman J. Bensmaia D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sliman J. Bensmaia sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sliman J. Bensmaia is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of neuroscience and engineering, with a strong emphasis on understanding the neural mechanisms underlying sensory and motor functions.

Their recent publications cover various aspects of neural engineering and sensory restoration. Notable papers include:

  • Restoration of sensory information via bionic hands, 2020, Nature Biomedical Engineering
  • The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity, 2021, Nature Reviews Neuroscience
  • The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands, 2021, Physiological Reviews
  • Unexpected complexity of everyday manual behaviors, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Neural population dynamics in motor cortex are different for reach and grasp, 2020, eLife

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Charles M. Greenspon
  • Lee E. Miller
  • Michael L. Boninger
  • Elizaveta V. Okorokova
  • Robert A. Gaunt

Regular publication venues where their work appears include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Nature Biomedical Engineering
  • Nature Communications

Bensmaia's main fields of study are:

  • Neuroscience
  • Engineering

They work extensively within subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Social Psychology

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms

Best Publications

  • Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex

    Sharlene N. Flesher;Jennifer L. Collinger;Stephen T. Foldes;Stephen T. Foldes;Jeffrey M. Weiss

  • Spatial and temporal codes mediate the tactile perception of natural textures

    Alison I. Weber;Hannes P. Saal;Justin D. Lieber;Ju-Wen Cheng

  • Restoring sensorimotor function through intracortical interfaces: progress and looming challenges

    Sliman J. Bensmaia;Lee E. Miller

  • Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: evidence from multidimensional scaling

    Mark Hollins;Sliman Bensmaïa;Kristie Karlof;Forrest Young

  • Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface.

    Gregg A. Tabot;John F. Dammann;Joshua A. Berg;Francesco V. Tenore

  • Biomimetic sensory feedback through peripheral nerve stimulation improves dexterous use of a bionic hand

    Jacob A. George;David T. Kluger;Tyler S. Davis;Suzanne M. Wendelken

  • The vibrations of texture.

    Sliman J BensmaIa;Mark Hollins

  • Pacinian representations of fine surface texture

    Sliman Bensmaïa;Mark Hollins

  • Touch is a team effort: interplay of submodalities in cutaneous sensibility.

    Hannes P. Saal;Sliman J. Bensmaia

  • The neural basis of perceived intensity in natural and artificial touch

    Emily L. Graczyk;Matthew A. Schiefer;Hannes P. Saal;Benoit P. Delhaye

  • Simulating tactile signals from the whole hand with millisecond precision.

    Hannes P. Saal;Benoit P. Delhaye;Brandon C. Rayhaun;Sliman J. Bensmaia

  • The Neural Coding of Stimulus Intensity: Linking the Population Response of Mechanoreceptive Afferents with Psychophysical Behavior

    Michael A. Muniak;Supratim Ray;Steven S. Hsiao;J. Frank Dammann

  • Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex.

    Benoit P. Delhaye;Katie H. Long;Sliman J. Bensmaia

  • Restoration of sensory information via bionic hands.

    Sliman J. Bensmaia;Dustin J. Tyler;Dustin J. Tyler;Silvestro Micera;Silvestro Micera

  • Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: An analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration

    T. Yoshioka;S. J. Bensmaïa;J. C. Craig;S. S. Hsiao

  • Natural scenes in tactile texture

    Louise R. Manfredi;Hannes P. Saal;Kyler J. Brown;Mark C. Zielinski

  • The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity.

    Anton R. Sobinov;Sliman J. Bensmaia

  • Vibrotactile adaptation impairs discrimination of fine, but not coarse, textures

    Mark Hollins;Sliman J. Bensmaïa;Sean Washburn

  • Multiplexing stimulus information through rate and temporal codes in primate somatosensory cortex.

    Michael A. Harvey;Hannes P. Saal;John F. Dammann;Sliman J. Bensmaia

  • The coding of roughness.

    Mark Hollins;Sliman J. Bensmaïa

  • Temporal Frequency Channels Are Linked across Audition and Touch

    Jeffrey M. Yau;Jonathon B. Olenczak;John F. Dammann;Sliman J. Bensmaia;Sliman J. Bensmaia

  • The neural coding of stimulus intensity: Linking the population response of mechanoreceptive afferents with psychophysical behavior (Journal of Neuroscience (October 24, 2007) (11687-11699))

    Michael A. Muniak;Supratim Ray;Steven S. Hsiao;J. Frank Dammann

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven S. Hsiao
Steven S. Hsiao Johns Hopkins University
Kenneth O. Johnson
Kenneth O. Johnson Johns Hopkins University
Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos
Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos University of Chicago
Lee E. Miller
Lee E. Miller Northwestern University
Dustin J. Tyler
Dustin J. Tyler Case Western Reserve University
Stefan Mihalas
Stefan Mihalas Allen Institute for Brain Science
Pablo Celnik
Pablo Celnik Johns Hopkins University
Nick F. Ramsey
Nick F. Ramsey Utrecht University
A.B. Cohen
A.B. Cohen Arizona State University
Ralph Etienne-Cummings
Ralph Etienne-Cummings Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Sliman J. Bensmaia

Trending Scientists