World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 39 2116 1968 155 140 185 6566

Adib A. Becker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adib A. Becker between 1970 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adib A. Becker published across 51 years, from 1970 to 2020, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2009. 11 of the 185 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2009. 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 3 publications
1970 2020

185 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adib A. Becker: publications per year, 1970 to 2020
Year Publications
1970 2
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 3
1989 3
1990 0
1991 2
1992 2
1993 7
1994 3
1995 2
1996 4
1997 2
1998 4
1999 3
2000 7
2001 6
2002 5
2003 7
2004 8
2005 7
2006 8
2007 7
2008 7
2009 19
2010 7
2011 12
2012 9
2013 5
2014 6
2015 6
2016 4
2017 2
2018 5
2019 8
2020 3
Total 185
Download as CSV

Adib A. Becker publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adib A. Becker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 177–186 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 185 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130 185
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Adib A. Becker D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adib A. Becker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126 39
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Composite material
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Thermodynamics

His primary areas of investigation include Finite element method, Structural engineering, Welding, Creep and Machining. The various areas that Adib A. Becker examines in his Finite element method study include Indentation, Mechanics, Material properties and Heat-affected zone. Adib A. Becker studied Structural engineering and Pressure vessel that intersect with Canalisation, Constitutive equation, Internal pressure and Pipe.

The Welding study which covers Residual stress that intersects with Cylinder stress. His Creep research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Numerical analysis and Rotational symmetry. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Machining, Cutting force, Material removal and Milling cutter is strongly linked to Deflection.

His most cited work include:

  • The Boundary Element Method in Engineering: A Complete Course (192 citations)
  • Milling error prediction and compensation in machining of low-rigidity parts (166 citations)
  • Residual stress simulation in thin and thick-walled stainless steel pipe welds including pipe diameter effects (126 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Finite element method, Structural engineering, Creep, Welding and Composite material. His study in Finite element method is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Indentation, Mechanics, Numerical analysis and Mechanical engineering. In general Mechanics study, his work on Rotational symmetry often relates to the realm of Matrix, thereby connecting several areas of interest.

His work is dedicated to discovering how Structural engineering, Piping are connected with Pressure vessel and other disciplines. The Creep study combines topics in areas such as Ovality, Continuum damage mechanics, Steady state and Damage mechanics. In his study, Martensite, Cylinder stress, Residual, Deep hole drilling and Machining is strongly linked to Residual stress, which falls under the umbrella field of Welding.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Finite element method (54.04%)
  • Structural engineering (34.78%)
  • Creep (30.43%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2020)?

  • Finite element method (54.04%)
  • Composite material (25.47%)
  • Structural engineering (34.78%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Adib A. Becker mainly focuses on Finite element method, Composite material, Structural engineering, Creep and Stress. His studies in Finite element method integrate themes in fields like Elasticity, Metallurgy, Aluminium, Welding and Mechanics. His Welding study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Residual stress, Thermocouple, Inconel and Tungsten.

His research in the fields of Material properties and Composite number overlaps with other disciplines such as Matrix. His Structural engineering study frequently involves adjacent topics like Machining vibrations. His Creep research focuses on Power station and how it relates to Nuclear engineering and Power.

Between 2013 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Analysis of shape and location effects of closely spaced metal loss defects in pressurised pipes (28 citations)
  • Material characterisation and finite element modelling of cyclic plasticity behaviour for 304 stainless steel using a crystal plasticity model (19 citations)
  • An experimental investigation of the effect of defect shape and orientation on the burst pressure of pressurised pipes (16 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Composite material
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Thermodynamics

His primary scientific interests are in Finite element method, Composite material, Structural engineering, Material properties and Stress. His work carried out in the field of Finite element method brings together such families of science as Welding, Temperature measurement, Mechanics, Microstructure and Machining vibrations. His Composite material study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Orientation.

His Structural engineering study often links to related topics such as Viscoelasticity. He interconnects Residual stress, Welding residual stress, Indentation, Neutron diffraction and Fusion welding in the investigation of issues within Material properties. His Stress research integrates issues from Young's modulus, Substructure, Metal and Creep.

Best Publications

  • The Boundary Element Method in Engineering: A Complete Course

    A. A. Becker

  • Milling error prediction and compensation in machining of low-rigidity parts

    Svetan Ratchev;Shulong Liu;Wei Huang;Adib A. Becker

  • An advanced FEA based force induced error compensation strategy in milling

    Svetan Ratchev;Shulong Liu;Wei Huang;Adib A. Becker

  • Residual stress simulation in thin and thick-walled stainless steel pipe welds including pipe diameter effects

    A. Yaghi;T.H. Hyde;A.A. Becker;W. Sun

  • Error compensation strategy in milling flexible thin-wall parts

    S. Ratchev;S. Liu;A.A. Becker

  • Residual stress simulation in welded sections of P91 pipes

    A.H. Yaghi;T.H. Hyde;A.A. Becker;J.A. Williams

  • Prediction of creep failure in aeroengine materials under multi-axial stress states

    T.H. Hyde;L. Xia;A.A. Becker

  • A solution for minimising vibrations in milling of thin walled casings by applying dampers to workpiece surface

    Kiran Kolluru;Dragos Axinte;Adib Becker

  • Finite element simulation of welding and residual stresses in a P91 steel pipe incorporating solid-state phase transformation and post-weld heat treatment

    A H Yaghi;T H Hyde;A A Becker;W Sun

  • A flexible force model for end milling of low-rigidity parts

    Svetan Ratchev;Shulong Liu;Wei Huang;Adib A. Becker

  • Finite-element creep damage analyses of P91 pipes

    T.H. Hyde;A.A. Becker;W. Sun;J.A. Williams

  • Interpretation of impression creep data using a reference stress approach

    T.H. Hyde;K.A. Yehia;A.A. Becker

  • Analysis of the impression creep test method using a rectangular indenter for determining the creep properties in welds

    T.H. Hyde;W. Sun;A.A. Becker

  • Determining elastic–plastic properties from indentation data obtained from finite element simulations and experimental results

    J.J. Kang;A.A. Becker;W. Sun

  • Benchmarks for finite element analysis of creep continuum damage mechanics

    A.A Becker;T.H Hyde;W Sun;P Andersson

  • A comparison between measured and modeled residual stresses in a circumferentially Butt-welded P91 steel pipe

    A. H. Yaghi;T. H. Hyde;A. A. Becker;W. Sun

  • Finite element simulation of residual stresses induced by the dissimilar welding of a P92 steel pipe with weld metal IN625

    A.H. Yaghi;T.H. Hyde;A.A. Becker;W. Sun

  • Finite element modelling of overlapping abrasive waterjet milled footprints

    S. Anwar;D.A. Axinte;A.A. Becker

  • Finite element modelling of abrasive waterjet milled footprints

    S. Anwar;D.A. Axinte;A.A. Becker

  • Creep crack growth in welds: a damage mechanics approach to predicting initiation and growth of circumferential cracks

    T.H. Hyde;W. Sun;A.A. Becker

Frequent Co-Authors

Wei Sun
Wei Sun University of Nottingham
T H Hyde
T H Hyde University of Nottingham
Svetan Ratchev
Svetan Ratchev University of Nottingham
Martyn J Pavier
Martyn J Pavier University of Bristol
Steve Benford
Steve Benford University of Nottingham
Dragos Axinte
Dragos Axinte University of Nottingham
Liviu Marin
Liviu Marin University of Bucharest
Richard Bowtell
Richard Bowtell University of Nottingham
Chris Greenhalgh
Chris Greenhalgh University of Nottingham
David J. Smith
David J. Smith Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career paths. For example, an online speech pathology bachelor degree for veterans offers a flexible option for those interested in healthcare and communication sciences, especially military veterans looking to transition into civilian roles.

Accelerated programs are also gaining popularity, such as the 5-year accelerated speech pathology programs, allowing students to complete their studies faster and enter the workforce sooner.

Career pathways extending beyond engineering include roles like criminal profiling, which require specialized education and training. Discovering how a career as a criminal profiler combines psychology and investigative skills might appeal to those interested in law enforcement and behavioral analysis.

Similarly, interdisciplinary roles in mental health can stem from various educational backgrounds. Choosing the right counselling degree helps build a solid foundation for careers in social services, therapy, or guidance counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Adib A. Becker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles