World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9863 9231 5211 4759 81 5159

H. Julia Hannay publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by H. Julia Hannay between 1975 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. H. Julia Hannay published across 50 years, from 1975 to 2024, averaging 1.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 1976. 1 of the 87 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 1976. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 5 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1975 2024

87 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
H. Julia Hannay: publications per year, 1975 to 2024
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 5
1977 1
1978 3
1979 4
1980 0
1981 5
1982 3
1983 3
1984 1
1985 3
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 2
1990 2
1991 0
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 2
1998 4
1999 4
2000 1
2001 2
2002 0
2003 0
2004 2
2005 2
2006 0
2007 3
2008 2
2009 2
2010 2
2011 1
2012 2
2013 2
2014 4
2015 4
2016 1
2017 0
2018 2
2019 2
2020 0
2021 2
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
Total 87
Download as CSV

H. Julia Hannay publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. Julia Hannay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 81 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 81
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

H. Julia Hannay D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. Julia Hannay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

H. Julia Hannay is affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work encompasses several subfields, including Neurology, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Molecular Biology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. The main focus of their research lies in Traumatic Brain Injury and related neurovascular disturbances.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • S100 Proteins and Annexins
  • Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments

Publication venues where Hannay has contributed include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Neurosurgery
  • Neurocritical Care
  • Neuropsychology

Frequent coauthors in Hannay's research collaborations are:

  • Claudia S. Robertson
  • Robert Garcia
  • Raymond J. Grill
  • Anthony Cerami
  • Tian Siva Tian

Recent papers by H. Julia Hannay include the following publications:

  • "Disability Rating Scale in the First Few Weeks After a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury as a Predictor of 6-Month Functional Outcome," 2020, Neurosurgery
  • "Predicting Clinical Outcomes 7-10 Years after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Exploring the Prognostic Utility of the IMPACT Lab Model and Cerebrospinal Fluid UCH-L1 and MAP-2," 2022, Neurocritical Care
  • "Corpus callosum structure and auditory interhemispheric transfer in spina bifida myelomeningocele," 2024, Neuropsychology
  • "Neuroprotection with an Erythropoietin Mimetic Peptide (pHBSP) in a Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Complicated by Hemorrhagic Shock," 2020, UNC Libraries
  • "Treatment of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury with an Erythropoietin-Mimetic Peptide," 2020, UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • Effect of erythropoietin and transfusion threshold on neurological recovery after traumatic brain injury: a randomized clinical trial

    Claudia S. Robertson;H. Julia Hannay;Jose-Miguel Yamal;Shankar Gopinath

  • Adult respiratory distress syndrome: a complication of induced hypertension after severe head injury.

    Charles F. Contant;Alex B. Valadka;Shankar P. Gopinath;H. Julia Hannay

  • Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase is a novel biomarker in humans for severe traumatic brain injury.

    Linda Papa;Linnet Akinyi;Ming Cheng Liu;Jose A. Pineda

  • Selective reminding test: An examination of the equivalence of four forms

    H. Julia Hannay;Harvey S. Levin

  • Spinal lesion level in spina bifida: A source of neural and cognitive heterogeneity

    Jack M. Fletcher;Kim Copeland;Jon A. Frederick;Susan E. Blaser

  • Clinical Significance of αII-Spectrin Breakdown Products in Cerebrospinal Fluid after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

    Jose A Pineda;Stephen B Lewis;Alex B Valadka;Linda Papa

  • Attention problems and executive functions in children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus.

    Rachel Burmeister;H. Julia Hannay;Kim Copeland;Jack M. Fletcher

  • Visual field effects and short-term memory for verbal material

    H.Julia Hannay;Daniel R. Malone

  • αII-Spectrin Breakdown Product Cerebrospinal Fluid Exposure Metrics Suggest Differences in Cellular Injury Mechanisms after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

    Gretchen M. Brophy;Jose A. Pineda;Linda Papa;Stephen B. Lewis

  • Predictors of psychological health in caregivers of patients with closed head injury

    A. M. Sander;W. M. High;H. J. Hannay;M. Sherer

  • The relation between acute physiological variables and outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale following severe traumatic brain injury.

    Margaret A. Struchen;H. Julia Hannay;Charles F. Contant;Claudia S. Robertson

  • Visual field recognition memory for right-handed females as a function of familial handedness.

    H. Julia Hannay;Daniel R. Malone

  • The neuropsychology of trichotillomania

    Melinda A. Stanley;H.Julia Hannay;Joy K. Breckenridge

  • Bilingualism and attention: a study of balanced and unbalanced bilingual deaf users of American Sign Language and English.

    Poorna Kushalnagar;H. Julia Hannay;Arturo E. Hernandez

  • Proceedings of the Houston Conference on specialty education and training in clinical neuropsychology, september 3–7, 1997, University of Houston Hilton and Conference Center

    Unknown

  • Hyperglycemia Increases Neurological Damage and Behavioral Deficits From Post-Traumatic Secondary Ischeie Insults

    Lela Cherian;H. Julia Hannay;Gregg Vagner;J. Clay Goodman

  • Biomarkers Improve Clinical Outcome Predictors of Mortality Following Non-Penetrating Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

    Linda Papa;Claudia S. Robertson;Kevin K. W. Wang;Gretchen M. Brophy

  • Validation of a controlled cortical impact model of head injury in mice.

    H. Julia Hannay;Zeev Feldman;Phillip Phan;Arash Keyani

  • Corpus callosum damage and interhemispheric transfer of information following closed head injury in children.

    Debra A. Benavidez;Jack M. Fletcher;H. Julia Hannay;Sondra T. Bland

  • Individual differences and asymmetry effects in memory for unfamiliar faces.

    H. Julia Hannay;Judith P. Rogers

  • Spina Bifida: Genes, Brain, and Development

    Jack M. Fletcher;Maureen Dennis;Hope Northrup;Marcia A. Barnes

  • Real or imagined incomplete lateralization of function in females

    H. Julia Hannay

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudia S. Robertson
Claudia S. Robertson Baylor College of Medicine
Harvey S. Levin
Harvey S. Levin Baylor College of Medicine
Jack M. Fletcher
Jack M. Fletcher University of Houston
Kevin K. W. Wang
Kevin K. W. Wang Morehouse School of Medicine
Barbara C. Tilley
Barbara C. Tilley The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Maureen Dennis
Maureen Dennis University of Toronto
David J. Francis
David J. Francis University of Houston
Paul R. Swank
Paul R. Swank The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Leonard H. Epstein
Leonard H. Epstein University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Susan H. Landry
Susan H. Landry The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and rewarding career paths. Many psychology students are particularly interested in careers such as social work, counseling, or mental health services. For those drawn to social work, it’s important to understand the specific education and licensing requirements in your state, as these can vary significantly.

For example, the social worker degree requirements in Virginia outline the necessary qualifications for practice, typically starting with a bachelor's in social work (BSW) and advancing to a master's degree (MSW) for higher-level roles. Similarly, you can review the Washington minimum degree requirement for social workers to understand which online programs meet state standards.

If you’re exploring opportunities elsewhere, it’s helpful to examine the social worker degree requirements in West Virginia and the Wisconsin education requirements for social workers. Each state has unique pathways and degree expectations, so researching state-specific requirements is crucial as you plan your educational journey in psychology and related helping professions.

Best Scientists Citing H. Julia Hannay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles