World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
4991
World Ranking
10877
National Ranking
128

Seungmoon Choi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seungmoon Choi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 252 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Seungmoon Choi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seungmoon Choi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Seungmoon Choi is affiliated with the Pohang University of Science and Technology in South Korea. Their research spans multiple fields including neuroscience, psychology, and engineering, particularly focused on intersections between human perception and technology.

The main fields of study for Seungmoon Choi include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Engineering

Within these broader areas, their work delves into several subfields, such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Social Psychology
  • Mechanical Engineering

Their core research topics highlight specific domains of interest in sensory and interactive technologies, including:

  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Color perception and design
  • Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

Seungmoon Choi has published extensively in several prominent venues, with a focus on haptics and interactive technologies. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • IEEE Transactions on Haptics
  • Advanced Materials Technologies
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Access
  • Journal of KIISE

Collaborations have been a significant component of their research, working repeatedly with several coauthors, including:

  • Chaeyong Park
  • Sung H. Han
  • Unyong Jeong
  • Gyeore Yun
  • Jiwan Lee

Some recent research papers reflect the range of topics and venues of their work:

  • "Methodology for Maximizing Information Transmission of Haptic Devices: A Survey," 2020, Proceedings of the IEEE
  • "Effectiveness of a Participatory and Interactive Virtual Reality Intervention in Patients With Social Anxiety Disorder: Longitudinal Questionnaire Study," 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Magnetorheological Fluid Haptic Shoes for Walking in VR," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Haptics
  • "Virtual Reality-Based Psychotherapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: fMRI Study Using a Self-Referential Task," 2021, JMIR Mental Health
  • "Hybrid Framework for Haptic Texture Modeling and Rendering," 2020, IEEE Access

Best Publications

  • Vibrotactile Display: Perception, Technology, and Applications

    Seungmoon Choi;K. J. Kuchenbecker

  • A Review of Surface Haptics: Enabling Tactile Effects on Touch Surfaces

    Cagatay Basdogan;Frederic Giraud;Vincent Levesque;Seungmoon Choi

  • Effects of haptic guidance and disturbance on motor learning: Potential advantage of haptic disturbance

    Jaebong Lee;Seungmoon Choi

  • Haptic augmented reality: Taxonomy and an example of stiffness modulation

    Seokhee Jeon;Seungmoon Choi

  • Toward realistic haptic rendering of surface textures

    Seungmoon Choi;Hong Z. Tan

  • Emotional responses of tactile icons: Effects of amplitude, frequency, duration, and envelope

    Yongjae Yoo;Taekbeom Yoo;Jihyun Kong;Seungmoon Choi

  • Real-Time Depth-of-Field Rendering Using Anisotropically Filtered Mipmap Interpolation

    Sungkil Lee;G. Jounghyun Kim;Seungmoon Choi

  • Toward realistic haptic rendering of surface textures

    S. Choi;H.Z. Tan

  • Detection Threshold and Mechanical Impedance of the Hand in a Pen-Hold Posture

    A. Israr;Seungmoon Choi;H.Z. Tan

  • Initial study for creating linearly moving vibrotactile sensation on mobile device

    Jongman Seo;Seungmoon Choi

  • Rendering Virtual Tumors in Real Tissue Mock-Ups Using Haptic Augmented Reality

    Seokhee Jeon;Seungmoon Choi;M. Harders

  • Laser-induced thermoelastic effects can evoke tactile sensations.

    Jae-Hoon Jun;Jong-Rak Park;Sung-Phil Kim;Young Min Bae

  • Real-Time Depth-of-Field Rendering Using Point Splatting on Per-Pixel Layers

    Sungkil Lee;Gerard Jounghyun Kim;Seungmoon Choi

  • Real-Time Tracking of Visually Attended Objects in Virtual Environments and Its Application to LOD

    Sungkil Lee;G.J. Kim;Seungmoon Choi

  • Vibrotactile Perceived Intensity for Mobile Devices as a Function of Direction, Amplitude, and Frequency

    Inwook Hwang;Jongman Seo;Myongchan Kim;Seungmoon Choi

  • Perceived Instability of Virtual Haptic Texture. I. Experimental Studies

    Seungmoon Choi;Hong Z. Tan

  • Perceptually Transparent Vibration Rendering Using a Vibration Motor for Haptic Interaction

    Jonghyun Ryu;Jaehoon Jung;Seojoon Kim;Seungmoon Choi

  • posVibEditor: Graphical authoring tool of vibrotactile patterns

    Jonghyun Ryu;Seungmoon Choi

  • Perceptual space of amplitude-modulated vibrotactile stimuli

    Gunhyuk Park;Seungmoon Choi

  • Efficacy of haptic blind spot warnings applied through a steering wheel or a seatbelt

    Jaemin Chun;In Lee;Gunhyuk Park;Jongman Seo

  • Improving 3D Shape Recognition withElectrostatic Friction Display

    Reza Haghighi Osgouei;Jin Ryong Kim;Seungmoon Choi

  • Vibrotactile Feedback for Information Delivery in the Vehicle

    Jonghyun Ryu;Jaemin Chun;Gunhyuk Park;Seungmoon Choi

Frequent Co-Authors

Hong Z. Tan
Hong Z. Tan Purdue University West Lafayette
Gerard Jounghyun Kim
Gerard Jounghyun Kim Korea University
Wan Kyun Chung
Wan Kyun Chung Pohang University of Science and Technology
Heon-Jeong Lee
Heon-Jeong Lee Korea University
Cagatay Basdogan
Cagatay Basdogan Koç University
Vincent Levesque
Vincent Levesque École de Technologie Supérieure
Seungjin Choi
Seungjin Choi Pohang University of Science and Technology
Katherine J. Kuchenbecker
Katherine J. Kuchenbecker Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
Marcia K. O'Malley
Marcia K. O'Malley Rice University
Domenico Prattichizzo
Domenico Prattichizzo University of Siena

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to various related fields and flexible learning options. Many students look to expand their expertise with online programs that align with industry needs and offer strong career prospects.

For those interested in a blend of technology and engineering, an online master’s in electrical engineering degree is a popular choice. This pathway is ideal for professionals aiming to specialize further while working or managing other commitments.

Alternatively, individuals seeking a faster entry into the workforce can consider short certificate programs that pay well. These credentials can be earned quickly and can boost employability in areas like IT support, data analytics, and software testing.

Time is also a crucial factor for many learners. Pursuing one of the quickest masters degree online options can allow students to earn an advanced degree in as little as a year, accelerating career advancement.

When choosing a path, it’s wise to focus on one of the most useful masters degrees to ensure long-term relevance and job market competitiveness.

Best Scientists Citing Seungmoon Choi

Trending Scientists