World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8804 4686 74 7139

David Dooley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Dooley between 1972 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Dooley published across 52 years, from 1972 to 2023, averaging 1.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2003. 1 of the 80 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2003. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 13 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1972 2023

80 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Dooley: publications per year, 1972 to 2023
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 3
1976 1
1977 1
1978 2
1979 3
1980 2
1981 4
1982 0
1983 2
1984 4
1985 3
1986 2
1987 4
1988 3
1989 3
1990 0
1991 1
1992 3
1993 3
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 4
1998 1
1999 0
2000 2
2001 1
2002 1
2003 13
2004 2
2005 1
2006 2
2007 2
2008 0
2009 2
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
Total 80
Download as CSV

David Dooley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Dooley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 74 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 74
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

David Dooley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Dooley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David Dooley is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their recent academic contributions focus on cancer imaging and related topics within medical imaging research.

Among their recent publications is the paper titled Proceedings of the 22nd International Cancer Imaging Society Meeting and Annual Teaching Course, published in 2023 in the journal Cancer Imaging.

Frequent co-authors with whom David Dooley has collaborated include:

  • Yin-Tzu Lin
  • Yenpo Lin
  • Kueian Chen
  • Gigin Lin
  • Wolfgang G. Kunz

David Dooley's work has appeared in the following publication venues:

  • Cancer Imaging

Best Publications

  • Underemployment and depression : Longitudinal relationships

    David Dooley;Joann Prause;Kathleen A. Ham-Rowbottom

  • Depression and unemployment: Panel findings from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area study

    David Dooley;Ralph Catalano;Georjeanna Wilson

  • Economic antecedents of child abuse and neglect.

    Laurence D. Steinberg;Ralph Catalano;David Dooley

  • Economic change as a cause of behavioral disorder.

    David Dooley;Ralph Catalano

  • Job loss and alcohol abuse: a test using data from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area project.

    Ralph Catalano;David Dooley;Georjeanna Wilson;Richard Hough

  • Unemployment, underemployment, and mental health: conceptualizing employment status as a continuum.

    David Dooley

  • Earthquake Preparedness: Predictors in a Community Survey1

    David Dooley;Ralph Catalano;Shiraz Mishra;Seth Serxner

  • Health effects of economic instability: a test of economic stress hypothesis.

    Ralph A. Catalano;David Dooley

  • Applying Social Support Research: Theoretical Problems and Future Directions

    Karen S. Rook;David Dooley

  • Unemployment and alcohol disorder in 1910 and 1990: Drift versus social causation

    David Dooley;Ralph Catalano;Richard Hough

  • Recent research on the psychological effects of unemployment.

    David Dooley;Ralph Catalano

  • Personal and Aggregate Unemployment and Psychological Symptoms

    David Dooley;Ralph Catalano;Karen S. Rook

  • Job and non‐job stressors and their moderators

    David Dooley;Karen Rook;Ralph Catalano

  • Labor markets and help-seeking: a test of the employment security hypothesis.

    Ralph Catalano;Karen Rook;David Dooley

  • Effect of underemployment on school-leavers' self-esteem

    JoAnn Prause;David Dooley

  • What Do They Want in Life?: The Life Goals of a Multi-Ethnic, Multi-Generational Sample of High School Seniors

    Esther S. Chang;Chuansheng Chen;Ellen Greenberger;David Dooley

  • Why the economy predicts help-seeking: A test of competing explanations.

    David Dooley;Ralph Catalano

  • “Good jobs” to “bad jobs”: replicated evidence of an employment continuum from two large surveys

    Joseph G Grzywacz;David Dooley

  • Economic, life, and disorder changes: time-series analyses.

    David Dooley;Ralph Catalano

  • Economic predictors of admissions to mental health facilities in a nonmetropolitan community.

    Ralph Catalano;David Dooley;Robert Jackson

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph Catalano
Ralph Catalano University of California, Berkeley
Karen S. Rook
Karen S. Rook University of California, Irvine
Richard L. Hough
Richard L. Hough Boston Children's Hospital
Gary W. Evans
Gary W. Evans Cornell University
Chuansheng Chen
Chuansheng Chen University of California, Irvine
Jutta Heckhausen
Jutta Heckhausen University of California, Irvine
Raymond W. Novaco
Raymond W. Novaco University of California, Irvine
Ellen Greenberger
Ellen Greenberger University of California, Irvine
Laurence Steinberg
Laurence Steinberg Temple University
Joseph G. Grzywacz
Joseph G. Grzywacz San Jose State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology programs in the USA offer flexible pathways to a variety of rewarding careers. One popular direction is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), which requires both advanced education and certification specific to each state or city. Students planning to practice in different regions must be aware of local requirements.

For example, those interested in working in California should review the Oakland mft certification requirements. In contrast, aspiring professionals in the Midwest may follow the Omaha mft certification requirements. Likewise, students considering Oklahoma should understand the Oklahoma City mft education requirements.

Additionally, if your career plans lead to Florida, it’s important to learn about the Orlando mft certification requirements as well. Each pathway comes with its own set of prerequisites, making it crucial to research options and select the program that matches your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing David Dooley

Recently Published Articles