World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
25371
World Ranking
15604
National Ranking
1434

Andrew M. Taylor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 506 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Andrew M. Taylor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew M. Taylor is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research output spans multiple topics within the broader field of medicine, with a focus on surgical practice, cardiology, and epidemiology, among other areas.

The primary fields of study for Andrew M. Taylor include:

  • Medicine

Their subfields of study highlight areas of specialized research interest:

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Key research topics covered in their work include:

  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Heavy Metals in Plants
  • Analytical chemistry methods development

Andrew M. Taylor has a record of publications in various journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Future Healthcare Journal
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Recent papers authored include:

  • Nonunion - consensus from the 4th annual meeting of the Danish Orthopaedic Trauma Society, 2020, EFORT Open Reviews
  • Avocado Consumption Alters Gastrointestinal Bacteria Abundance and Microbial Metabolite Concentrations among Adults with Overweight or Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2020, Journal of Nutrition
  • Use of an ambient artificial intelligence tool to improve quality of clinical documentation, 2024, Future Healthcare Journal
  • A validated computational framework to predict outcomes in TAVI, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Impact of Electronic Health Record Use on Cognitive Load and Burnout Among Clinicians: Narrative Review, 2024, JMIR Medical Informatics

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as:

  • Neil J. Sebire
  • John Booth
  • Mario Cortina-Borja
  • William Bryant
  • Anastassia Spiridou

Best Publications

  • Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk

    Georg B. Ehret;Georg B. Ehret;Georg B. Ehret;Patricia B. Munroe;Kenneth M. Rice;Murielle Bochud

  • Equilibrium Contrast Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Measurement of Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis Preliminary Validation in Humans

    Andrew S. Flett;Martin P. Hayward;Michael T. Ashworth;Michael S. Hansen

  • Early mortality after hip fracture: is delay before surgery important?

    Christopher G. Moran;Russell T. Wenn;Manoj Sikand;Andrew M. Taylor

  • Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study.

    Rachael A Evans;Hamish McAuley;Ewen M Harrison;Aarti Shikotra

  • Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation Impact of Evolving Technology and Learning Curve on Clinical Outcome

    Philipp Lurz;Louise Coats;Sachin Khambadkone;Johannes Nordmeyer

  • Genetic associations at 53 loci highlight cell types and biological pathways relevant for kidney function

    Cristian Pattaro;Alexander Teumer;Mathias Gorski;Audrey Y. Chu

  • Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation in Humans Results in 59 Consecutive Patients

    Sachin Khambadkone;Louise Coats;Andrew Taylor;Younes Boudjemline

  • Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease

    Sohrab Fratz;Taylor Chung;Gerald F. Greil;Margaret M. Samyn

  • Cerebral Magnetic Resonance Biomarkers in Neonatal Encephalopathy: A Meta-analysis

    Sudhin Thayyil;Manigandan Chandrasekaran;Andrew Taylor;Alan Bainbridge

  • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Circulatory Disease from Exposure to Low-Level Ionizing Radiation and Estimates of Potential Population Mortality Risks

    Mark P. Little;Tamara V. Azizova;Dimitry Bazyka;Simon D. Bouffler

  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurement of myocardial extracellular volume in health and disease

    Daniel M Sado;Andrew S Flett;Sanjay M Banypersad;Steven K White

  • Multimodality Imaging Guidelines for Patients with Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography: Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and the Society for Pediatric Radiology

    Anne Marie Valente;Stephen Cook;Pierluigi Festa;H. Helen Ko

  • Biventricular response after pulmonary valve replacement for right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction: is age a predictor of outcome?

    Alessandra Frigiola;Victor Tsang;Catherine Bull;Louise Coats

  • Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study

    Sudhin Thayyil;Neil J Sebire;Neil J Sebire;Lyn S Chitty;Angie Wade

  • Clinical cardiac MRI

    Jan Bogaert;Steven Dymarkowski;Andrew M. Taylor

  • New susceptibility loci associated with kidney disease in type 1 diabetes.

    Niina Sandholm;Niina Sandholm;Rany M. Salem;Rany M. Salem;Amy Jayne McKnight;Eoin P. Brennan

  • Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation based on rapid prototyping of right ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary trunk from MR data

    Silvia Schievano;Francesco Migliavacca;Louise Coats;Sachin Khambadkone

  • Coronary Artery Imaging in Grown Up Congenital Heart Disease Complementary Role of Magnetic Resonance and X-Ray Coronary Angiography

    Andrew M. Taylor;Sara A. Thorne;Michael B. Rubens;Permi Jhooti

  • Mutation detection rate and spectrum in familial hypercholesterolaemia patients in the UK pilot cascade project

    A Taylor;D Wang;K Patel;R Whittall

  • Cardiac anatomy revisited

    Robert H Anderson;Reza Razavi;Andrew M Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Felix Aharonian
Felix Aharonian Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies
Gavin Rowell
Gavin Rowell University of Adelaide
Jim Hinton
Jim Hinton Max Planck Society
Andrea Santangelo
Andrea Santangelo University of Tübingen
Olaf Reimer
Olaf Reimer University of Innsbruck
Dieter Horns
Dieter Horns Universität Hamburg
Werner Hofmann
Werner Hofmann Max Planck Society
R. Steenkamp
R. Steenkamp University of Namibia
Michael Backes
Michael Backes University of Oxford
S. Colafrancesco
S. Colafrancesco University of the Witwatersrand

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and alternative career pathways in health care. Many students and working professionals consider flexibility and affordability when choosing their next steps. For those seeking a foundational route, the cheapest online health science degree options offer an affordable entry into healthcare administration and support roles.

Advancing your career is also possible with specialized graduate programs. The most affordable online mha programs help students move into hospital management or healthcare leadership without the burden of excessive student debt. For nurses aiming for top roles in practice or research, the most affordable online dnp programs provide a doctoral path to advanced clinical practice.

Pharmacy is another strong career option. With evolving healthcare demands, online pharmacist programs allow students to qualify remotely for a high-demand, well-compensated field. Each of these pathways offers unique advantages, helping you shape a flexible and rewarding career in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew M. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles