World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 83 15604 14680 1434 1370 506 25371

Andrew M. Taylor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew M. Taylor between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew M. Taylor published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 15.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 81 publications in 2010. 27 of the 589 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 81. Peak 81 publications in 2010. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 34 publications 2009: 37 publications 2010: 81 publications 2011: 43 publications 2012: 49 publications 2013: 46 publications 2014: 45 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 18 publications
1988 2025

589 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew M. Taylor: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 5
1997 3
1998 2
1999 14
2000 4
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 10
2005 14
2006 14
2007 14
2008 34
2009 37
2010 81
2011 43
2012 49
2013 46
2014 45
2015 26
2016 28
2017 22
2018 5
2019 12
2020 10
2021 8
2022 17
2023 13
2024 9
2025 18
Total 589
Download as CSV

Andrew M. Taylor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 506 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 506
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew M. Taylor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 83
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew M. Taylor is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research output spans multiple topics within the broader field of medicine, with a focus on surgical practice, cardiology, and epidemiology, among other areas.

The primary fields of study for Andrew M. Taylor include:

  • Medicine

Their subfields of study highlight areas of specialized research interest:

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Key research topics covered in their work include:

  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Heavy Metals in Plants
  • Analytical chemistry methods development

Andrew M. Taylor has a record of publications in various journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Future Healthcare Journal
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Recent papers authored include:

  • Nonunion - consensus from the 4th annual meeting of the Danish Orthopaedic Trauma Society, 2020, EFORT Open Reviews
  • Avocado Consumption Alters Gastrointestinal Bacteria Abundance and Microbial Metabolite Concentrations among Adults with Overweight or Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2020, Journal of Nutrition
  • Use of an ambient artificial intelligence tool to improve quality of clinical documentation, 2024, Future Healthcare Journal
  • A validated computational framework to predict outcomes in TAVI, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Impact of Electronic Health Record Use on Cognitive Load and Burnout Among Clinicians: Narrative Review, 2024, JMIR Medical Informatics

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as:

  • Neil J. Sebire
  • John Booth
  • Mario Cortina-Borja
  • William Bryant
  • Anastassia Spiridou

Best Publications

  • Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk

    Georg B. Ehret;Georg B. Ehret;Georg B. Ehret;Patricia B. Munroe;Kenneth M. Rice;Murielle Bochud

  • Equilibrium Contrast Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Measurement of Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis Preliminary Validation in Humans

    Andrew S. Flett;Martin P. Hayward;Michael T. Ashworth;Michael S. Hansen

  • Early mortality after hip fracture: is delay before surgery important?

    Christopher G. Moran;Russell T. Wenn;Manoj Sikand;Andrew M. Taylor

  • Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study.

    Rachael A Evans;Hamish McAuley;Ewen M Harrison;Aarti Shikotra

  • Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation Impact of Evolving Technology and Learning Curve on Clinical Outcome

    Philipp Lurz;Louise Coats;Sachin Khambadkone;Johannes Nordmeyer

  • Genetic associations at 53 loci highlight cell types and biological pathways relevant for kidney function

    Cristian Pattaro;Alexander Teumer;Mathias Gorski;Audrey Y. Chu

  • Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation in Humans Results in 59 Consecutive Patients

    Sachin Khambadkone;Louise Coats;Andrew Taylor;Younes Boudjemline

  • Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease

    Sohrab Fratz;Taylor Chung;Gerald F. Greil;Margaret M. Samyn

  • Cerebral Magnetic Resonance Biomarkers in Neonatal Encephalopathy: A Meta-analysis

    Sudhin Thayyil;Manigandan Chandrasekaran;Andrew Taylor;Alan Bainbridge

  • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Circulatory Disease from Exposure to Low-Level Ionizing Radiation and Estimates of Potential Population Mortality Risks

    Mark P. Little;Tamara V. Azizova;Dimitry Bazyka;Simon D. Bouffler

  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurement of myocardial extracellular volume in health and disease

    Daniel M Sado;Andrew S Flett;Sanjay M Banypersad;Steven K White

  • Multimodality Imaging Guidelines for Patients with Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography: Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and the Society for Pediatric Radiology

    Anne Marie Valente;Stephen Cook;Pierluigi Festa;H. Helen Ko

  • Biventricular response after pulmonary valve replacement for right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction: is age a predictor of outcome?

    Alessandra Frigiola;Victor Tsang;Catherine Bull;Louise Coats

  • Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study

    Sudhin Thayyil;Neil J Sebire;Neil J Sebire;Lyn S Chitty;Angie Wade

  • Clinical cardiac MRI

    Jan Bogaert;Steven Dymarkowski;Andrew M. Taylor

  • New susceptibility loci associated with kidney disease in type 1 diabetes.

    Niina Sandholm;Niina Sandholm;Rany M. Salem;Rany M. Salem;Amy Jayne McKnight;Eoin P. Brennan

  • Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation based on rapid prototyping of right ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary trunk from MR data

    Silvia Schievano;Francesco Migliavacca;Louise Coats;Sachin Khambadkone

  • Coronary Artery Imaging in Grown Up Congenital Heart Disease Complementary Role of Magnetic Resonance and X-Ray Coronary Angiography

    Andrew M. Taylor;Sara A. Thorne;Michael B. Rubens;Permi Jhooti

  • Mutation detection rate and spectrum in familial hypercholesterolaemia patients in the UK pilot cascade project

    A Taylor;D Wang;K Patel;R Whittall

  • Cardiac anatomy revisited

    Robert H Anderson;Reza Razavi;Andrew M Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Felix Aharonian
Felix Aharonian Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies
Gavin Rowell
Gavin Rowell University of Adelaide
Jim Hinton
Jim Hinton Max Planck Society
Andrea Santangelo
Andrea Santangelo University of Tübingen
Olaf Reimer
Olaf Reimer University of Innsbruck
Dieter Horns
Dieter Horns Universität Hamburg
Werner Hofmann
Werner Hofmann Max Planck Society
R. Steenkamp
R. Steenkamp University of Namibia
Michael Backes
Michael Backes University of Oxford
S. Colafrancesco
S. Colafrancesco University of the Witwatersrand

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and alternative career pathways in health care. Many students and working professionals consider flexibility and affordability when choosing their next steps. For those seeking a foundational route, the cheapest online health science degree options offer an affordable entry into healthcare administration and support roles.

Advancing your career is also possible with specialized graduate programs. The most affordable online mha programs help students move into hospital management or healthcare leadership without the burden of excessive student debt. For nurses aiming for top roles in practice or research, the most affordable online dnp programs provide a doctoral path to advanced clinical practice.

Pharmacy is another strong career option. With evolving healthcare demands, online pharmacist programs allow students to qualify remotely for a high-demand, well-compensated field. Each of these pathways offers unique advantages, helping you shape a flexible and rewarding career in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew M. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles