World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
7303
World Ranking
7005
National Ranking
3792

Rael T. Lange publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rael T. Lange sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 239 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Rael T. Lange D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rael T. Lange sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rael T. Lange is affiliated with the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on traumatic brain injury (TBI), neurobehavioral outcomes, and related mental health aspects, reflected in over 120 publications within the fields of medicine and psychology.

The main areas of study for Lange include:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology

Within these, the subfields addressed include:

  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Neurology
  • General Health Professions

Lange's research covers several topics related to brain injury and mental health, including:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Lange include:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder is a Stronger Predictor of Long-Term Neurobehavioral Outcomes Than Traumatic Brain Injury Severity, 2020, Journal of Traumatic Stress
  • Serum Tau, Neurofilament Light Chain, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, and Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase L1 Are Associated with the Chronic Deterioration of Neurobehavioral Symptoms after Traumatic Brain Injury, 2022, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Longitudinal trajectories and risk factors for persistent postconcussion symptom reporting following uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. Military service members, 2020, The Clinical Neuropsychologist

Other relevant papers in collaborative research settings have appeared in journals like Quality of Life Research and Scientific Reports.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Lange include:

  • Tracey A. Brickell
  • Louis M. French
  • Sara M. Lippa
  • Jason M. Bailie
  • Megan M. Wright

Key publication venues for their work feature:

  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Rehabilitation Psychology
  • Quality of Life Research
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Overall, Lange's body of work encompasses extensive epidemiological and clinical research related to traumatic brain injury and factors influencing long-term neurobehavioral and psychological outcomes. Their collaborations span multiple specialists in the field, with a focus on military and veteran populations in some studies.

Best Publications

  • Examination of "postconcussion-like" symptoms in a healthy sample

    Grant L. Iverson;Rael T. Lange

  • A prospective biopsychosocial study of the persistent post-concussion symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury.

    Minna Wäljas;Grant L Iverson;Rael T Lange;Ullamari Hakulinen

  • “Good Old Days” Bias Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

    Grant L Iverson;Rael T Lange;Brian L Brooks;V Lynn Ashton Rennison

  • Depression strongly influences postconcussion symptom reporting following mild traumatic brain injury.

    Rael T. Lange;Grant L. Iverson;Alice Rose

  • Detecting exaggeration and malingering with the trail making test.

    Grant L Iverson;Rael T Lange;Paul Green;Michael D Franzen

  • Outcome from Complicated versus Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

    Grant L. Iverson;Rael T. Lange;Rael T. Lange;Minna Wäljas;Suvi Liimatainen

  • Post-concussion Symptom Reporting and the “Good-Old-Days” Bias Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

    Rael T. Lange;Grant L. Iverson;Alice Rose

  • Interview versus questionnaire symptom reporting in people with the postconcussion syndrome.

    Grant L. Iverson;Brian L. Brooks;V. Lynn Ashton;Rael T. Lange

  • Variable, Not Always Persistent, Postconcussion Symptoms after Mild TBI in U.S. Military Service Members: A Five-Year Cross-Sectional Outcome Study

    Rael T. Lange;Tracey A. Brickell;Brian Ivins;Rodney D. Vanderploeg

  • Traumatic brain injury caregivers: A qualitative analysis of spouse and parent perspectives on quality of life

    Anna L. Kratz;Angelle M. Sander;Tracey A. Brickell;Rael T. Lange

  • Interpreting the Trail Making Test Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison of Traditional Time Scores and Derived Indices

    Rael T. Lange;Grant L. Iverson;Martin J. Zakrzewski;Patrick E. Ethel-King

  • Influence of poor effort on self-reported symptoms and neurocognitive test performance following mild traumatic brain injury.

    Rael T Lange;Grant L Iverson;Brian L Brooks;V Lynn Ashton Rennison

  • Diffusion tensor imaging findings are not strongly associated with postconcussional disorder 2 months following mild traumatic brain injury.

    Rael T. Lange;Grant L. Iverson;Jeffrey R. Brubacher;Burkhard Mädler

  • Influence of poor effort on neuropsychological test performance in U.S. military personnel following mild traumatic brain injury.

    Rael T. Lange;Sonal Pancholi;Aditya Bhagwat;Victoria C. Anderson-Barnes

  • Neuropsychological functioning following complicated vs. uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury

    Rael T Lange;Grant L Iverson;Michael D Franzen

  • Subjective cognitive complaints and neuropsychological test performance following military-related traumatic brain injury

    Louis M. French;Rael T. Lange;Tracey A. Brickell

  • Health-related quality of life in caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury: development of a conceptual model

    Noelle E. Carlozzi;Anna L. Kratz;Angelle M. Sander;Nancy D. Chiaravalloti

  • Return to work following mild traumatic brain injury.

    Minna Wäljas;Grant L. Iverson;Rael T. Lange;Suvi Liimatainen

  • Neuropsychological Outcome from Blast versus Non-blast: Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in U.S. Military Service Members

    Rael T. Lange;Sonal Pancholi;Tracey A. Brickell;Sara Sakura

  • Female Service Members and Symptom Reporting after Combat and Non-Combat-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

    Tracey A Brickell;Sara M Lippa;Sara M Lippa;Louis M French;Jan E Kennedy;Jan E Kennedy

  • Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

    Grant L. Iverson;Rael T. Lange

Frequent Co-Authors

Louis M. French
Louis M. French United States Army Research Laboratory
Grant L. Iverson
Grant L. Iverson Harvard University
Angelle M. Sander
Angelle M. Sander Baylor College of Medicine
Noelle E. Carlozzi
Noelle E. Carlozzi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robin A. Hanks
Robin A. Hanks Wayne State University
Elizabeth A. Hahn
Elizabeth A. Hahn Northwestern University
Noah D. Silverberg
Noah D. Silverberg University of British Columbia
David S. Tulsky
David S. Tulsky University of Delaware
Brian L. Brooks
Brian L. Brooks Alberta Children's Hospital
Donald H. Saklofske
Donald H. Saklofske University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of online programs and professional pathways. Students can choose from bachelor's and master's degrees that are fully online, allowing for flexibility in balancing studies with other commitments. These programs often focus on key areas like mental health counseling, human behavior, and therapy techniques.

For those interested in clinical work, the journey continues beyond graduation. Practical experience, supervised hours, and specific state licensure are essential to become a practicing therapist. Requirements may differ from state to state. For example, Bakersfield licensed therapist requirements highlight the importance of California-specific standards, while steps in other cities, such as learning how to become a licensed therapist in Baltimore, may involve unique educational and clinical prerequisites.

Exploring how to become a licensed therapist in Boise or becoming a licensed therapist in Boston demonstrates the variety of requirements and opportunities across the U.S. By understanding these differences, students can better plan their online education and future career paths in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Rael T. Lange

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles