World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
4370
World Ranking
6729
National Ranking
301

Bertrand Schatz publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bertrand Schatz sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 162 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Bertrand Schatz D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bertrand Schatz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bertrand Schatz is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research primarily spans across the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, with significant involvement in subfields including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, and Genetics.

The scientist's work focuses extensively on topics related to plant and animal studies, plant parasitism and resistance, ecology and vegetation dynamics, species distribution and climate change, insect and pesticide research, genetic diversity and population structure, and insect and arachnid ecology and behavior.

Schatz has contributed several publications to notable venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Acta Oecologica
  • Botany Letters
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Environmental Evidence

Their recent papers include:

  • "Pollinator conservation in the context of global changes with a focus on France and Belgium," 2021, Acta Oecologica
  • "Some bee-pollinated plants provide nutritionally incomplete pollen amino acid resources to their pollinators," 2022, PLoS ONE
  • "How biased is our perception of plant-pollinator networks? A comparison of visit- and pollen-based representations of the same networks," 2020, Acta Oecologica
  • "Why are there so many bee-orchid species? Adaptive radiation by intra-specific competition for mnesic pollinators," 2020, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • "Key Questions for Next-Generation Biomonitoring," 2020, Frontiers in Environmental Science

Bertrand Schatz has coauthored frequently with several researchers, including François Massol, Joris A. M. Bertrand, Bruno Buatois, Anaïs Gibert, and Roselyne Buscail.

Additionally, Schatz has contributed to book publications, including the title "A Next-Generation of Biomonitoring to Detect Global Ecosystem Change," published in 2020 by Frontiers Media.

Best Publications

  • Polydomy in ants: what we know, what we think we know, and what remains to be done

    Gabriel Debout;Bertrand Schatz;Marianne Elias;Doyle Mckey

  • Prospects for repellent in pest control: current developments and future challenges

    Emilie Deletre;Bertrand Schatz;Denis Bourguet;Fabrice Chandre

  • Floral scents: their roles in nursery pollination mutualisms

    Martine Hossaert-McKey;Catherine Soler;Bertrand Schatz;Magali Proffit

  • Long-term anthropogenic and ecological dynamics of a Mediterranean landscape: Impacts on multiple taxa

    Clélia Sirami;Clélia Sirami;Amélie Nespoulous;Jean-Paul Cheylan;Jean-Paul Cheylan;Pascal Marty

  • Understanding intraspecific variation of floral scent in light of evolutionary ecology

    Roxane Delle-Vedove;Bertrand Schatz;Mathilde Dufay

  • Graded recruitment and hunting strategies linked to prey weight and size in the ponerine ant Ectatomma ruidum

    Bertrand Schatz;Jean-Paul Lachaud;Guy Beugnon

  • Chemical mediation and niche partitioning in non-pollinating fig-wasp communities.

    Magali Proffit;Bertrand Schatz;Renée M. Borges;Martine Hossaert-Mckey

  • The town Crepis and the country Crepis : How does fragmentation affect a plant-pollinator interaction ?

    Emilie Andrieu;Emilie Andrieu;Antoine Dornier;Soraya Rouifed;Bertrand Schatz

  • Key Questions for Next-Generation Biomonitoring

    Andreas Makiola;Zacchaeus G. Compson;Donald J. Baird;Matthew A. Barnes

  • The use of path integration to guide route learning in ants

    B. Schatz;S. Chameron;G. Beugnon;T. S. Collett

  • Floral scent variation in two Antirrhinum majus subspecies influences the choice of naïve bumblebees

    Claire Suchet;Claire Suchet;Claire Suchet;Laurent Dormont;Bertrand Schatz;Martin Giurfa

  • Signalling receptivity: Comparison of the emission of volatile compounds by figs of Ficus hispida before, during and after the phase of receptivity to pollinators

    Magali Proffit;Bertrand Schatz;Jean-Marie Bessiere;Chun Chen

  • Time-place learning by an invertebrate, the ant Ectatomma ruidum Roger

    Bertrand Schatz;Guy Beugnon;Jean-Paul Lachaud

  • Geographic variation of floral scent in a highly specialized pollination mutualism.

    Catherine Soler;Martine Hossaert-McKey;Bruno Buatois;Jean-Marie Bessière

  • Phylogeography and genetic structure of the orchid Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng. across its European central–marginal gradient

    Marion Pfeifer;Bertrand Schatz;F. Xavier Picó;Nicodemo G. Passalacqua

  • Can chemical signals, responsible for mutualistic partner encounter, promote the specific exploitation of nursery pollination mutualisms? The case of figs and fig wasps

    Magali Proffit;Magali Proffit;Chun Chen;Catherine Soler;Jean‐Marie Bessière

  • Complex interactions on fig trees: ants capturing parasitic wasps as possible indirect mutualists of the fig /fig wasp interaction

    Bertrand Schatz;Magali Proffit;B. V. Rakhi;Renee M. Borges

  • Effect of pollination strategy, phylogeny and distribution on pollination niches of Euro‐Mediterranean orchids

    Nina Joffard;François Massol;Matthias Grenié;Claudine Montgelard

  • Interactions of the ant Crematogaster scutellaris with the fig/fig wasp mutualism

    Bertrand Schatz;Martine Hossaert-Mckey

  • Spatio-temporal learning by the ant ectatomma ruidum

    Bertrand Schatz;Jean-Paul Lachaud;Guy Beugnon

  • Queen dimorphism and reproductive capacity in the ponerine ant, Ectatomma ruidum Roger.

    Jean-Paul Lachaud;Alex Cadena;Bertrand Schatz;Gabriela Pérez-Lachaud

  • Evidence for intersexual chemical mimicry in a dioecious plant.

    Catherine C. L. Soler;Magali Proffit;Jean-Marie Bessière;Martine Hossaert-McKey

  • Rare white‐flowered morphs increase the reproductive success of common purple morphs in a food‐deceptive orchid

    L. Dormont;R. Delle‐Vedove;J.‐M. Bessière;M. Hossaert‐Mc Key

Frequent Co-Authors

Martine Hossaert-McKey
Martine Hossaert-McKey Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Marie Bessière
Jean-Marie Bessière École Normale Supérieure
Alain Dejean
Alain Dejean Paul Sabatier University
Doyle McKey
Doyle McKey University of Montpellier
Roger Pradel
Roger Pradel University of Montpellier
Finn Kjellberg
Finn Kjellberg Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
François Munoz
François Munoz Grenoble Alpes University
Michel Baguette
Michel Baguette Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jérôme Orivel
Jérôme Orivel Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Eric Bonabeau
Eric Bonabeau Icosystem (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Ecology and Evolution, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career pathways. Fields like nursing and healthcare also offer flexible routes for career advancement, often through accelerated and bridge programs.

For example, those curious about fast-tracked clinical roles can learn how long to become nurse practitioner and get familiar with the shortest educational journeys available. Likewise, registered nurses looking to level up can complete an rn to bsn in 6 months program, allowing for quick progression and expanded job prospects.

Others with an associate degree in nursing might choose to bridge to higher-level roles via the streamlined adn to np pathways. Additionally, ambitious individuals from non-nursing backgrounds can still make the transition to advanced practice by exploring online msn programs for non nurses.

Whether you’re interested in environmental sciences or healthcare, online programs provide flexible, efficient options for upskilling or changing career direction—all while managing other life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Bertrand Schatz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles