World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
7289
World Ranking
4676
National Ranking
201

Finn Kjellberg publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Finn Kjellberg sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 140 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Finn Kjellberg D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Finn Kjellberg sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Finn Kjellberg is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research primarily spans the Agricultural and Biological Sciences with a specific focus on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior, and Systematics, along with significant work in Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. Molecular Biology and Insect Science also feature within their subfields of study.

The scientist's work concentrates on various topics, including Plant and Animal Studies, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Plant Diversity and Evolution, and Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species. Additional subjects covered include Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions and Plant Reproductive Biology.

Finn Kjellberg has published in multiple venues, notably contributing to:

  • Acta Oecologica
  • Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
  • Annals of Botany
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution

Frequent collaborators include Astrid Cruaud, Jean-Yves Rasplus, Rodrigo Augusto Santinelo Pereira, Hui Yu, and Rhett D. Harrison.

The most recent publications authored by or involving Finn Kjellberg span from 2020 to 2023 and include:

  • Evolution and classification of figs (Ficus, Moraceae) and their close relatives (Castilleae) united by involucral bracts, 2020, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
  • Exploring systematic biases, rooting methods and morphological evidence to unravel the evolutionary history of the genus Ficus (Moraceae), 2020, Cladistics
  • Molecular mechanisms of mutualistic and antagonistic interactions in a plant-pollinator association, 2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Pollinating fig wasps' simple solutions to complex sex ratio problems: a review, 2022, Frontiers in Zoology
  • Echoes of ancient introgression punctuate stable genomic lineages in the evolution of figs, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Best Publications

  • A clonal theory of parasitic protozoa: the population structures of Entamoeba, Giardia, Leishmania, Naegleria, Plasmodium, Trichomonas, and Trypanosoma and their medical and taxonomical consequences

    Michel Tibayrenc;Finn Kjellberg;Francisco J. Ayala

  • Are eukaryotic microorganisms clonal or sexual? A population genetics vantage.

    M Tibayrenc;F Kjellberg;J Arnaud;B Oury

  • An Extreme Case of Plant–Insect Codiversification: Figs and Fig-Pollinating Wasps

    Astrid Cruaud;Nina Ronsted;Nina Ronsted;Nina Ronsted;Bhanumas Chantarasuwan;Lien Siang Chou

  • Phylogenetic relationships, historical biogeography and character evolution of fig-pollinating wasps.

    Carlos A. Machado;Emmanuelle Jousselin;Finn Kjellberg;Stephen G. Compton

  • THE STABILITY OF THE SYMBIOSIS BETWEEN DIOECIOUS FIGS AND THEIR POLLINATORS: A STUDY OF FICUS CARICA L. AND BLASTOPHAGA PSENES L.

    F. Kjellberg;P.-H. Gouyon;M. Ibrahim;M. Raymond

  • Figs and fig pollinators: evolutionary conflicts in a coevoled mutualism.

    Marie Charlotte Anstett;Martine Hossaert-McKey;Finn Kjellberg

  • CONVERGENCE AND COEVOLUTION IN A MUTUALISM: EVIDENCE FROM A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY OF FICUS

    Emmanuelle Jousselin;Jean-Yves Rasplus;Finn Kjellberg;Finn Kjellberg

  • Pollination mode in fig wasps: the predictive power of correlated traits.

    Finn Kjellberg;Emmanuelle Jousselin;Emmanuelle Jousselin;Judith L. Bronstein;Aviva Patel

  • THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF FLOWERING ASYNCHRONY IN MONOECIOUS FIGS: A SIMULATION STUDY'

    Judith L. Bronstein;Judith L. Bronstein;Pierre-Henri Gouyon;Chris Gliddon;Finn Kjellberg

  • The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids: Fig–associated wasps: pollinators and parasites, sex–ratio adjustment and male polymorphism, population structure and its consequences

    Edward Allen Herre;Stuart A. West;James M. Cook;Steven G. Compton

  • Why do fig wasps actively pollinate monoecious figs

    Emmanuelle Jousselin;Emmanuelle Jousselin;Martine Hossaert-McKey;Edward Allen Herre;Finn Kjellberg

  • Laying the foundations for a new classification of Agaonidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), a multilocus phylogenetic approach

    Astrid Cruaud;Roula Jabbour-Zahab;Gwenaëlle Genson;Corinne Cruaud

  • Gynandromorphs and intersexes: potential to understand the mechanism of sex determination in arthropods

    Satoko Narita;Rodrigo A. S. Pereira;Finn Kjellberg;Daisuke Kageyama

  • Cyto-nuclear discordance in the phylogeny of Ficus section Galoglychia and host shifts in plant-pollinator associations

    Julien P Renoult;Finn Kjellberg;Cinderella Grout;Cinderella Grout;Sylvain Santoni

  • Identification and characterization of microsatellite loci in the common fig (Ficus carica L.) and representative species of the genus Ficus

    B. Khadari;I. Hochu;S. Santoni;F. Kjellberg

  • When figs wait for pollinators: the length of fig receptivity

    Bouchaib Khadari;Marc Gibernau;Marie-Charlotte Anstett;Finn Kjellberg

  • Phylogeography and the origin of cassava: New insights from the northern rim of the Amazonian basin

    Guillaume Léotard;Anne Duputié;Finn Kjellberg;Emmanuel J.P. Douzery

  • Shift to mutualism in parasitic lineages of the fig/fig wasp interaction

    Emmanuelle Jousselin;Jean‐Yves Rasplus;Finn Kjellberg

  • Floral volatiles, pollinator sharing and diversification in the fig–wasp mutualism: insights from Ficus natalensis, and its two wasp pollinators (South Africa)

    A. Cornille;J. G. Underhill;A. Cruaud;M. Hossaert-McKey

  • First plastid phylogenomic study reveals potential cyto-nuclear discordance in the evolutionary history of Ficus L. (Moraceae)

    Sam Bruun-Lund;Wendy L. Clement;Finn Kjellberg;Nina Rønsted

  • Range expansion drives dispersal evolution in an equatorial three-species symbiosis.

    Guillaume Léotard;Gabriel Debout;Ambroise Dalecky;Sylvain Guillot

Frequent Co-Authors

Martine Hossaert-McKey
Martine Hossaert-McKey Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Yves Rasplus
Jean-Yves Rasplus INRA Biology Center for Population Management (CBGP)
Emmanuelle Jousselin
Emmanuelle Jousselin INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Stephen G. Compton
Stephen G. Compton University of Leeds
Simon Van Noort
Simon Van Noort Iziko South African Museum
Judith L. Bronstein
Judith L. Bronstein University of Arizona
Doyle McKey
Doyle McKey University of Montpellier
Francisco J. Ayala
Francisco J. Ayala University of California, Irvine
Bertrand Schatz
Bertrand Schatz Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Michel Tibayrenc
Michel Tibayrenc Institut de Recherche pour le Développement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens diverse doors for study and employment. Many students take advantage of non profit online schools for flexible, accredited degree options. These programs often make it easier to balance education with work or family commitments.

If you're considering careers in allied health or life sciences, it's smart to compare program features such as those highlighted in wgu vs chamberlain. Such comparisons help you find the right balance of affordability, scheduling, and reputation—key factors in choosing an online degree.

For those aiming to advance quickly, accelerated tracks like bsn to msn programs online demonstrate how bridge programs speed up career progression. Similarly, quick, focused degrees are emerging for environmental and biological science fields.

Veterans and military families seeking support can also benefit from schools recognized among the veteran friendly online colleges. These institutions are tailored to unique needs, making it easier for service members to transition into science-related careers.

Best Scientists Citing Finn Kjellberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles