World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 60 1440 1284 688 604 180 17097

Elizabeth A. Hahn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth A. Hahn between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth A. Hahn published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2015. 6 of the 212 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2015. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1990 2025

212 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth A. Hahn: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 3
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 2
1997 4
1998 2
1999 3
2000 2
2001 0
2002 5
2003 13
2004 4
2005 8
2006 7
2007 9
2008 6
2009 2
2010 10
2011 6
2012 2
2013 2
2014 12
2015 23
2016 12
2017 7
2018 12
2019 15
2020 16
2021 6
2022 3
2023 7
2024 3
2025 3
Total 212
Download as CSV

Elizabeth A. Hahn publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Hahn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 180 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 180
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Elizabeth A. Hahn D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Hahn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106 60
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Elizabeth A. Hahn is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research contributions primarily fall within the field of Medicine, with a focus on Biomedical Engineering, Emergency Medicine, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health as notable subfields.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Cancer Survivorship and Care
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair

Frequent publication venues where Elizabeth A. Hahn has contributed are:

  • UNC Libraries
  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • Rehabilitation Psychology
  • Quality of Life Research
  • Journal of Cardiac Failure

Co-authors commonly collaborating with them include:

  • David Cella
  • Kathleen L. Grady
  • Larry A. Allen
  • Jeffrey J. Teuteberg
  • Colleen K. McIlvennan

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Assessing meaning & purpose in life: development and validation of an item bank and short forms for the NIH PROMIS®," 2020, Quality of Life Research
  • "Systematic review of interventions aimed at improving HIV adherence to care in low- and middle-income countries in Sub-Saharan Africa," 2022, Journal of Infection and Public Health
  • "Health literacy, health outcomes, and the caregiver role in traumatic brain injury," 2020, Rehabilitation Psychology
  • "The mediating effect of health literacy on COVID-19 vaccine confidence among a diverse sample of urban adults in Boston and Chicago," 2023, Vaccine
  • "A Low Literacy, Multimedia Health Information Technology Intervention to Enhance Patient-Centered Cancer Care in Safety Net Settings Increased Cancer Knowledge in a Randomized Controlled Trial," 2021, Cancer Control

Best Publications

  • The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008

    David Cella;William Riley;Arthur Stone;Nan Rothrock

  • Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening.

    David Cella;Elizabeth A. Hahn;Kelly Dineen

  • Sexual Satisfaction and the Importance of Sexual Health to Quality of Life Throughout the Life Course of U.S. Adults

    Kathryn E. Flynn;Li Lin;Deborah Watkins Bruner;Jill M. Cyranowski

  • Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument

    Wendy L. Ward;Elizabeth A. Hahn;Fei Mo;Lesbia Hernandez

  • Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life, Growth, and Spiritual Well-Being After Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation

    Michael A. Andrykowski;Michelle M. Bishop;Elizabeth A. Hahn;David F. Cella

  • New English and Spanish social health measures will facilitate evaluating health determinants.

    Elizabeth A. Hahn;Darren A. DeWalt;Rita K. Bode;Sofia F. Garcia

  • Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing

    Elizabeth A. Hahn;Robert F. DeVellis;Rita K. Bode;Sofia F. Garcia

  • Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: A qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities

    Joy Hammel;Susan Magasi;Allen W. Heinemann;David B. Gray

  • Bedside cardiovascular examination in patients with severe chronic heart failure: Importance of rest or inducible jugular venous distension

    Samuel M. Butman;Gordon A. Ewy;James R. Standen;Karl B. Kern

  • Quality of Life in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia on Imatinib Versus Interferon Alfa Plus Low-Dose Cytarabine: Results From the IRIS Study

    Elizabeth A. Hahn;G. Alastair Glendenning;Mark V. Sorensen;Stacie A. Hudgens

  • Late Effects of Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation on Spouses or Partners Compared With Survivors and Survivor-Matched Controls

    Michelle M. Bishop;Jennifer L. Beaumont;Elizabeth A. Hahn;David Cella

  • Re-validation and shortening of the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) questionnaire.

    J. M. Ribaudo;David Cella;Elizabeth A Hahn;S. R. Lloyd

  • Validation of the PROMIS physical function measures in a diverse US population-based cohort of cancer patients

    Roxanne E. Jensen;Arnold L. Potosky;Bryce B. Reeve;Elizabeth Hahn

  • Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domain names and definitions revisions: Further evaluation of content validity in IRT-derived item banks

    William T. Riley;Nan Rothrock;Bonnie Bruce;Christopher Christodolou

  • A Change in Sleep Pattern May Predict Alzheimer Disease

    Elizabeth A. Hahn;Hui-Xin Wang;Ross Andel;Laura Fratiglioni

  • Effect of a home-based exercise intervention of wearable technology and telephone coaching on walking performance in peripheral artery disease: The honor randomized clinical trial

    Mary M. McDermott;Bonnie Spring;Jeffrey S. Berger;Diane Treat-Jacobson

  • Assessment is not enough: a randomized controlled trial of the effects of HRQL assessment on quality of life and satisfaction in oncology clinical practice.

    Sarah K. Rosenbloom;Sarah K. Rosenbloom;David E. Victorson;David E. Victorson;Elizabeth A. Hahn;Elizabeth A. Hahn;Amy H. Peterman

  • United States Population-Based Estimates of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Symptom and Functional Status Reference Values for Individuals With Cancer

    Roxanne E. Jensen;Arnold L. Potosky;Carol M. Moinpour;Tania Lobo

  • Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS(®) Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0.

    Kevin P. Weinfurt;Li Lin;Deborah Watkins Bruner;Jill M. Cyranowski

  • Precision of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Data Compared With Other Clinical Measures

    Elizabeth A. Hahn;David Cella;Olivier Chassany;Diane L. Fairclough

  • Health Outcomes Assessment in Vulnerable Populations: Measurement Challenges and Recommendations

    Elizabeth A. Hahn;David Cella

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes in Performance Measurement

    David Cella;Elizabeth A. Hahn;Sally E. Jensen;Zeeshan Butt

Frequent Co-Authors

David Cella
David Cella Northwestern University
Noelle E. Carlozzi
Noelle E. Carlozzi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jin Shei Lai
Jin Shei Lai Northwestern University
David S. Tulsky
David S. Tulsky University of Delaware
Angelle M. Sander
Angelle M. Sander Baylor College of Medicine
Louis M. French
Louis M. French United States Army Research Laboratory
Allen W. Heinemann
Allen W. Heinemann Northwestern University
Robin A. Hanks
Robin A. Hanks Wayne State University
Rita K. Bode
Rita K. Bode Northwestern University
Rael T. Lange
Rael T. Lange Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens a variety of educational pathways, especially through flexible online programs. Many students are now choosing online master programs to quickly gain advanced knowledge and become more competitive in sectors like psychology, education, social work, or policy analysis.

For those just starting, an online bachelor's degree offers a valuable foundation in core social science concepts and can be completed at an accelerated pace to fast-track your entry into the job market.

Cost is a major consideration for many prospective students. Choosing one of the cheapest online msw options can make a career in social work more accessible, while still delivering high-quality instruction in essential practice and theory.

If your interest lies in applied behavior analysis or special education, pursuing one of the bcba certification programs online can help you become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst with both affordability and flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth A. Hahn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles