World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
24903
World Ranking
15626
National Ranking
7868

Allen W. Heinemann publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allen W. Heinemann sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 527 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Allen W. Heinemann D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allen W. Heinemann sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Allen W. Heinemann is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their primary research contribution is in the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Rehabilitation, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work covers a range of topics related to medical rehabilitation and disability, including:

  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation
  • Disability Education and Employment
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated extensively with Heinemann include:

  • Anne Deutsch
  • Helen Hoenig
  • Jonathan F. Bean
  • Andrea Cheville
  • Carolyn Sperry

Heinemann has contributed numerous papers, with recent publications addressing topics such as workplace accommodations for disabled individuals, research reporting standards, and medical autopsy practices. Notable recent papers include:

  • Job Accommodations, Return to Work and Job Retention of People with Physical Disabilities: A Systematic Review (2021) published in the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
  • Rasch Reporting Guideline for Rehabilitation Research (RULER): the RULER Statement (2022) published in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Reporting Guideline for RULER: Rasch Reporting Guideline for Rehabilitation Research: Explanation and Elaboration (2022) published in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Evidence for Systematic Autopsies in COVID-19 Positive Deceased (2020) published in Rechtsmedizin
  • Blinding in Rehabilitation Research (2020) published in American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Heinemann's work has appeared frequently in several publication venues, with the most common being:

  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
  • Rechtsmedizin
  • American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
  • Disability and Rehabilitation

The researcher has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association since 1997.

Best Publications

  • The structure and stability of the functional independence measure

    John Michael Linacre;Allen W. Heinemann;Benjamin D. Wright;Carl V. Granger

  • Performance profiles of the functional independence measure.

    Carl V. Granger;Byron B. Hamilton;John M. Linacre;Allen W. Heinemann

  • Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure

    Allen Walter Heinemann;John Michael Linacre;Benjamin D. Wright;Byron B. Hamilton

  • Neuro-QOL: brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology

    D. Cella;J. S. Lai;C. J. Nowinski;D. Victorson

  • Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury

    K. T. Ragnarsson;W. R. Clarke;J. R. Daling;S. L. Garber

  • Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures

    Allen W. Heinemann;John Michael Linacre;Benjamin D. Wright;Bryon B. Hamilton

  • Incidence of and Risk Factors for Medical Complications During Stroke Rehabilitation

    Elliot J. Roth;Linda Lovell;Richard L. Harvey;Allen W. Heinemann

  • Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing

    Elizabeth A. Hahn;Robert F. DeVellis;Rita K. Bode;Sofia F. Garcia

  • Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: A qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities

    Joy Hammel;Susan Magasi;Allen W. Heinemann;David B. Gray

  • Measuring stigma across neurological conditions: the development of the stigma scale for chronic illness (SSCI)

    Deepa Rao;Deepa Rao;Seung W. Choi;Seung W. Choi;David Victorson;David Victorson;Rita Bode

  • Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS): A comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments

    Allen W. Heinemann;R. K. Bode;C. O'Reilly

  • Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts.

    Lynne V. McFarland;Sandra L. Hubbard Winkler;Sandra L. Hubbard Winkler;Allen W. Heinemann;Melissa Jones

  • Multivariate Analysis of Improvement and Outcome Following Stroke Rehabilitation

    Allen W. Heinemann;Elliot J. Roth;Kristine Cichowski;Henry B. Betts

  • Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions.

    Melannie S. Alexander;K. D. Anderson;F. Biering-Sorensen;A. R. Blight

  • A qualitative study of quality of life after stroke: the importance of social relationships.

    Elizabeth B. Lynch;Zeeshan Butt;Allen Heinemann;David Victorson

  • Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines.

    Leighton Chan;Allen W. Heinemann;Jason Roberts

  • Functional outcome following rehabilitation of the cancer patient

    Christina M. Marciniak;James A. Sliwa;Gayle Spill;Allen W. Heinemann

  • Outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty in persons aged 80 years and older.

    Victoria Brander;Sunita Malhotra;Jennie Jet;Allen Heinemann

  • Rehospitalization in the First Year of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury After Discharge From Medical Rehabilitation

    Gerben Dejong;Gerben Dejong;Gerben Dejong;Wenqiang Tian;Wenqiang Tian;Wenqiang Tian;Ching Hui Hsieh;Ching Hui Hsieh;Cherry Junn

  • Impairment and disability: Their relation during stroke rehabilitation

    Elliot J Roth;Elliot J Roth;Allen Walter Heinemann;Allen Walter Heinemann;Linda L. Lovell;Richard L Harvey;Richard L Harvey

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Tulsky
David S. Tulsky University of Delaware
David Cella
David Cella Northwestern University
Jin Shei Lai
Jin Shei Lai Northwestern University
Noelle E. Carlozzi
Noelle E. Carlozzi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rita K. Bode
Rita K. Bode Northwestern University
Walter R. Frontera
Walter R. Frontera University of Puerto Rico
Angelle M. Sander
Angelle M. Sander Baylor College of Medicine
Robert K. Heaton
Robert K. Heaton University of California, San Diego
Richard Gershon
Richard Gershon Northwestern University
John D. Corrigan
John D. Corrigan The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative online degrees and career pathways can be a smart step for those interested in healthcare but not planning to pursue a traditional MD. Fields like medical billing and coding are increasingly popular, offering strong job growth and flexible work options. Many top programs provide financial aid for medical billing and coding students, making this career path more accessible.

Nursing is another high-demand field, and entry requirements vary. For example, some do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school programs do not require the TEAS or HESI exams, broadening access for aspiring nurses.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing healthcare administration degree programs online can fast-track your advancement into management roles. Additionally, registered nurses seeking to become nurse practitioners can benefit from adn to np bridge programs, which provide a streamlined path to a master’s degree and advanced practice.

Exploring these related degrees opens doors to rewarding healthcare careers beyond the physician pathway, many of which can be started or advanced through online study.

Best Scientists Citing Allen W. Heinemann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles