World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
17091
World Ranking
6022
National Ranking
96

Bart M. ter Haar Romeny publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart M. ter Haar Romeny sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 248 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bart M. ter Haar Romeny D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart M. ter Haar Romeny sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Bart M. ter Haar Romeny is affiliated with the Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research spans both Medicine and Computer Science, with a significant focus on applied topics in ophthalmology and artificial intelligence.

The scientist's recent publications illustrate an emphasis on retinal imaging and analysis as well as related medical conditions and treatments. Notable papers include:

  • Type 2 diabetes and HbA1c are independently associated with wider retinal arterioles: the Maastricht study, 2020, Diabetologia
  • From Local to Global: A Graph Framework for Retinal Artery/Vein Classification, 2020, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience
  • WITHDRAWN: 4.7 Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes are Associated With Wider Retina Arterioles and Venules, 2020, Artery Research

The research topics Bart M. ter Haar Romeny has worked on include:

  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases

Their subfields of study consist of:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Health Informatics
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Bart M. ter Haar Romeny frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Diabetologia
  • IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience
  • Artery Research

Collaborations form an integral part of Bart M. ter Haar Romeny's research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Fan Huang
  • Behdad Dashtbozorg
  • Tao Tan
  • Miranda T. Schram
  • Tos T. J. M. Berendschot

Their interdisciplinary approach combines aspects of medicine and computer science, particularly focusing on the use of artificial intelligence in analyzing retinal conditions and other medical applications. This includes the development of frameworks for classifying retinal arteries and veins using advanced computational techniques.

Best Publications

  • Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations

    Stephen M. Pizer;Stephen M. Pizer;E. Philip Amburn;E. Philip Amburn;John D. Austin;Robert Cromartie

  • Efficient and reliable schemes for nonlinear diffusion filtering

    J. Weickert;B.M.T.H. Romeny;M.A. Viergever

  • Geometry-Driven Diffusion in Computer Vision

    Bart M. Romeny

  • Active shape model segmentation with optimal features

    B. van Ginneken;A.F. Frangi;J.J. Staal;B.M. ter Haar Romeny

  • Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography: a survey

    B. Van Ginneken;B.M. Ter Haar Romeny;M.A. Viergever

  • Scale and the differential structure of images

    Luc M. J. Florack;Bart M. ter Haar Romeny;Jan J. Koenderink;Max A. Viergever

  • Front-End Vision and Multi-Scale Image Analysis

    Unknown

  • Robust Retinal Vessel Segmentation via Locally Adaptive Derivative Frames in Orientation Scores

    Jiong Zhang;Behdad Dashtbozorg;Erik Bekkers;Josien P. W. Pluim

  • Automatic detection of abnormalities in chest radiographs using local texture analysis

    B. van Ginneken;S. Katsuragawa;B.M. ter Haar Romeny;Kunio Doi

  • Higher order differential structure of images

    Bart M ter Haar Romeny;Luc Mj Florack;Alfons H Salden;Max A Viergever

  • General intensity transformations and differential invariants

    Lmj Luc Florack;BM Bart ter Haar Romeny;JJ Koenderink;MA Max Viergever

  • On the Axioms of Scale Space Theory

    Remco Duits;Luc Florack;Jan De Graaf;Bart Ter Haar Romeny

  • The Gaussian scale-space paradigm and the multiscale local jet

    Luc Florack;Luc Florack;Bart Ter Haar Romeny;Max Viergever;Jan Koenderink

  • Automatic segmentation of lung fields in chest radiographs.

    Bram van Ginneken;BM Bart ter Haar Romeny

  • Linear scale-space

    L. M. J. Florack;B. M. ter Haar Romeny;J. J. Koenderink;M. A. Viergever

  • Scale-Space: Its Natural Operators and Differential Invariants

    Bart M. ter Haar Romeny;Luc Florack;Jan J. Koenderink;Max A. Viergever

  • A Multi-Orientation Analysis Approach to Retinal Vessel Tracking

    Erik Bekkers;Remco Duits;Tos Berendschot;Bart Ter Haar Romeny

  • Structural and Resting State Functional Connectivity of the Subthalamic Nucleus: Identification of Motor STN Parts and the Hyperdirect Pathway

    Ellen Johanna Leonarda Brunenberg;Pim Moeskops;Walter H. Backes;Claudio Pollo;Claudio Pollo

  • Cartesian differential invariants in scale-space

    Lmj Luc Florack;ter Bm Bart Haar Romeny;JJ Koenderink;Max A Viergever

  • Image Analysis and Reconstruction using a Wavelet Transform Constructed from a Reducible Representation of the Euclidean Motion Group

    Remco Duits;Michael Felsberg;Gösta Granlund;Bart Ter Romeny

  • Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision

    Bart Haar Romeny;Luc Florack;Jan Koenderink;Max Viergever

Frequent Co-Authors

Max A. Viergever
Max A. Viergever Utrecht University
Paul Suetens
Paul Suetens KU Leuven
Jan J. Koenderink
Jan J. Koenderink Delft University of Technology
Anna Vilanova
Anna Vilanova Eindhoven University of Technology
Wiro J. Niessen
Wiro J. Niessen University Medical Center Groningen
Bram van Ginneken
Bram van Ginneken Radboud University
Nicolaas C. Schaper
Nicolaas C. Schaper Maastricht University
Stephen M. Pizer
Stephen M. Pizer University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mads Nielsen
Mads Nielsen University of Copenhagen
Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
Veerle Visser-Vandewalle University of Cologne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can significantly broaden your career options after studying Computer Science in the USA. Choosing the best degrees is crucial for aligning with growing tech fields such as data science, cybersecurity, or artificial intelligence.

If you’re considering further studies, it’s helpful to know what is the easiest masters degree to get. Opting for a streamlined master’s program can offer you new credentials without overwhelming workload, helping you upskill efficiently for roles in leadership, IT management, or software development.

For those aspiring to the highest academic levels, the rise of affordable phd programs online makes pursuing a doctorate more feasible than ever. These programs offer flexibility and cost savings compared to traditional on-campus options.

Alternatively, if your goal is to advance quickly, consider accelerated edd programs online. These fast-track education doctorates can open doors to academic leadership, technology policy, or instructional design.

Best Scientists Citing Bart M. ter Haar Romeny

Trending Scientists