World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4299 3972 2395 2163 126 22436

Richard Gershon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard Gershon between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard Gershon published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 54 publications in 2025. 93 of the 304 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 54. Peak 54 publications in 2025. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 43 publications 2024: 39 publications 2025: 54 publications
1991 2025

304 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard Gershon: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 4
2006 5
2007 3
2008 2
2009 4
2010 9
2011 6
2012 4
2013 19
2014 17
2015 10
2016 8
2017 13
2018 5
2019 12
2020 8
2021 8
2022 23
2023 43
2024 39
2025 54
Total 304
Download as CSV

Richard Gershon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Gershon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 126
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard Gershon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Gershon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1983 - Canada Gairdner International Award

Overview

Richard Gershon is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields such as Psychiatry and Mental Health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, notably:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Frailty in Older Adults

Richard Gershon has frequently published in several academic venues, including:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Pediatric Research
  • Infant Behavior and Development

Their recent papers include:

  • "Challenges in Participant Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Health Apps: Literature Review," 2022, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Trends in Screen Time Use Among Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic, July 2019 Through August 2021," 2023, JAMA Network Open
  • "Validation of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery in intellectual disability," 2020, Neurology
  • "Youth Well-being During the COVID-19 Pandemic," 2022, PEDIATRICS
  • "Uses of the NIH Toolbox® in Clinical Samples," 2022, Neurology Clinical Practice

The scientist has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including:

  • Cindy J. Nowinski
  • David Cella
  • Emily Ho
  • Lisa P. Jacobson
  • Aaron J. Kaat

Richard Gershon received the Canada Gairdner International Award in 1983.

Best Publications

  • The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008

    David Cella;William Riley;Arthur Stone;Nan Rothrock

  • Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

    Bryce B. Reeve;Ron D. Hays;Jakob B. Bjorner;Karon F. Cook

  • Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox

    Sandra Weintraub;Sureyya S. Dikmen;Robert K. Heaton;David S. Tulsky

  • NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function

    Richard C. Gershon;Molly V. Wagster;Hugh C. Hendrie;Nathan A. Fox

  • ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research

    Bryce B. Reeve;Kathleen W. Wyrwich;Albert W. Wu;Galina Velikova

  • Neuro-QOL: brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology

    D. Cella;J. S. Lai;C. J. Nowinski;D. Victorson

  • The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment

    David Cella;David Cella;Richard Gershon;Richard Gershon;Jin Shei Lai;Jin Shei Lai;Seung Choi

  • PROMIS® Adult Health Profiles: Efficient Short-Form Measures of Seven Health Domains.

    David Cella;Seung W. Choi;David M. Condon;Benjamin David Schalet

  • Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel.

    Honghu Liu;David Cella;Richard Gershon;Jie Shen

  • Reliability and Validity of Composite Scores from the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in Adults

    Robert K. Heaton;Natacha Akshoomoff;David Tulsky;Dan M Mungas

  • Sit-to-stand test: Performance and determinants across the age-span

    Richard W. Bohannon;Deborah J. Bubela;Susan R. Magasi;Ying Chih Wang

  • Assessment of neurological and behavioural function: the NIH Toolbox

    Richard C Gershon;David Cella;Nathan A Fox;Richard J Havlik

  • Neuro-QOL: quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing

    Richard C. Gershon;Jin Shei Lai;Rita Bode;Seung Choi

  • How Item Banks and Their Application Can Influence Measurement Practice in Rehabilitation Medicine: A PROMIS Fatigue Item Bank Example

    Jin Shei Lai;David Cella;Seung Choi;Doerte U. Junghaenel

  • The cognition battery of the NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function: Validation in an adult sample

    Sandra Weintraub;Sureyya S. Dikmen;Robert K. Heaton;David S. Tulsky;David S. Tulsky

  • NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): Validation of executive function measures in adults

    Philip David Zelazo;Jacob E. Anderson;Jennifer Richler;Kathleen Wallner-Allen

  • VIII. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): composite scores of crystallized, fluid, and overall cognition.

    Natacha Akshoomoff;Jennifer L. Beaumont;Patricia J. Bauer;Sureyya S. Dikmen

  • Developing patient-reported outcome measures for pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations

    Dennis C. Turk;Robert H. Dworkin;Laurie B. Burke;Richard Gershon

  • Challenges in Participant Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Health Apps: Literature Review

    Unknown

  • Motor assessment using the NIH Toolbox

    Unknown

  • Demographically Corrected Normative Standards for the English Version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery.

    Kaitlin B. Casaletto;Anya Umlauf;Jennifer Beaumont;Richard Gershon

  • Grip and Knee extension muscle strength reflect a common construct among adults

    Richard W. Bohannon;Susan R. Magasi;Deborah J. Bubela;Ying Chih Wang

  • Assessing dexterity function: a comparison of two alternatives for the NIH Toolbox.

    Ying Chih Wang;Ying Chih Wang;Susan R. Magasi;Richard W. Bohannon;David B. Reuben

Frequent Co-Authors

David Cella
David Cella Northwestern University
David S. Tulsky
David S. Tulsky University of Delaware
Jin Shei Lai
Jin Shei Lai Northwestern University
Karon F. Cook
Karon F. Cook Northwestern University
Dan M Mungas
Dan M Mungas University of California, Davis
Noelle E. Carlozzi
Noelle E. Carlozzi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Sandra Weintraub
Sandra Weintraub Northwestern University
Robert K. Heaton
Robert K. Heaton University of California, San Diego
Jennifer J. Manly
Jennifer J. Manly Columbia University
Allen W. Heinemann
Allen W. Heinemann Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a range of online programs and counseling-related careers, including Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT). Online degrees allow students to gain foundational knowledge in psychology while navigating the specific requirements needed for state licensure.

For those interested in becoming licensed MFTs, it’s important to understand that education and certification standards vary by location. For instance, the Cincinnati mft education requirements include a master’s degree in marriage and family therapy or a related field, plus supervised clinical experience. Similarly, the Cleveland mft education requirements emphasize graduate preparation and licensure exams to practice professionally.

In other regions, pathways may differ. For example, the Colorado Springs mft certification requirements highlight the importance of state-approved coursework and continued supervision. Meanwhile, meeting the Columbus mft education requirements also necessitates practical training and passing state-specific assessments.

Exploring related online degrees with a focus on clinical skills, ethics, and cultural competence can provide a strong foundation for diverse career pathways in psychology and counseling across the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Gershon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles