World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 96 728 637 459 391 296 42687

Paul A. Pilkonis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul A. Pilkonis between 1970 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul A. Pilkonis published across 57 years, from 1970 to 2026, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2019. 6 of the 316 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2019. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 5 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 8 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
1970 2026

316 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul A. Pilkonis: publications per year, 1970 to 2026
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 5
1978 0
1979 1
1980 3
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 3
1985 1
1986 3
1987 2
1988 4
1989 1
1990 5
1991 3
1992 4
1993 3
1994 2
1995 3
1996 8
1997 4
1998 5
1999 11
2000 3
2001 1
2002 8
2003 3
2004 10
2005 11
2006 6
2007 10
2008 6
2009 4
2010 10
2011 7
2012 14
2013 14
2014 15
2015 11
2016 12
2017 14
2018 12
2019 30
2020 7
2021 12
2022 7
2023 6
2024 2
2025 5
2026 1
Total 316
Download as CSV

Paul A. Pilkonis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Pilkonis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 291–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 296 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113 296
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul A. Pilkonis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Pilkonis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58 96
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul A. Pilkonis is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States and specializes in psychology. Their research primarily focuses on clinical psychology, with significant work also in experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, education, and cognitive neuroscience.

They have contributed extensively to topics including child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, personality disorders and psychopathology, mental health research topics, attachment and relationship dynamics, autism spectrum disorder research, early childhood education and development, and psychotherapy techniques and applications.

Recent publications by Pilkonis include:

  • "Indicators of Affect Dynamics: Structure, Reliability, and Personality Correlates" (2020, European Journal of Personality)
  • "Psychometric Properties of the Emotion Dysregulation Inventory in a Nationally Representative Sample of Youth" (2020, Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology)
  • "Affective Dynamics Across Internalizing and Externalizing Dimensions of Psychopathology" (2020, Clinical Psychological Science)
  • "Personalized models of psychopathology as contextualized dynamic processes: An example from individuals with borderline personality disorder" (2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology)
  • "Evidence Base Update for Questionnaires of Emotion Regulation and Reactivity for Children and Adolescents" (2021, Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology)

Paul A. Pilkonis has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including:

  • Aidan G.C. Wright
  • Carla A. Mazefsky
  • David J. Kolko
  • David Cella
  • Oliver Lindhiem

The most common venues for Pilkonis's research publications are:

  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
  • UNC Libraries
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • European Journal of Personality

Their research predominantly falls under the field of psychology, with 57 identified publications contributing to this area.

Best Publications

  • The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008

    David Cella;William Riley;Arthur Stone;Nan Rothrock

  • National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. General effectiveness of treatments.

    Irene Elkin;M. Tracie Shea;John T. Watkins;Stanley D. Imber

  • Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger.

    Paul A. Pilkonis;Seung W. Choi;Steven P. Reise;Angela M. Stover

  • Development of Short Forms From the PROMIS™ Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment Item Banks

    Lan Yu;Daniel J. Buysse;Anne Germain;Douglas E. Moul

  • The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: Findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

    Janice L. Krupnick;Stuart M. Sotsky;Sam Simmens;Janet Moyer

  • Consensus criteria for traumatic grief: A preliminary empirical test

    Holly G. Prigerson;M. K. Shear;S. C. Jacobs;C. F. Reynolds

  • Patient Predictors of Response to Psychotherapy and Pharmacotherapy: Findings in the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program

    Stuart M. Sotsky;David R. Glass;M. Tracie Shea;Paul A. Pilkonis

  • Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments.

    Daniel J. Buysse;Lan Yu;Douglas E. Moul;Anne Germain

  • Treatment of major depression with psychotherapy or psychotherapy-pharmacotherapy combinations.

    Michael E. Thase;Joel B. Greenhouse;Ellen Frank;Charles F. Reynolds

  • Course of depressive symptoms over follow-up. Findings from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

    M. Tracie Shea;Irene Elkin;Stanley D. Imber;Stuart M. Sotsky

  • Patient predictors of response to psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy: findings in the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

    Sotsky Sm;Glass Dr;Shea Mt;Pilkonis Pa

  • Psychiatric disorders among bariatric surgery candidates: relationship to obesity and functional health status.

    Melissa A. Kalarchian;Marsha D. Marcus;Michele D. Levine;M.P.H. Anita P. Courcoulas

  • Personality disorders and treatment outcome in the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

    M T Shea;P A Pilkonis;E Beckham;J F Collins

  • PROMIS® Adult Health Profiles: Efficient Short-Form Measures of Seven Health Domains.

    David Cella;Seung W. Choi;David M. Condon;Benjamin David Schalet

  • The behavioral consequences of shyness1

    Paul A. Pilkonis

  • Clinical validity of PROMIS Depression, Anxiety, and Anger across diverse clinical samples

    Benjamin D. Schalet;Paul A. Pilkonis;Lan Yu;Nathan Dodds

  • Mode-specific effects among three treatments for depression.

    S D Imber;P A Pilkonis;S M Sotsky;I Elkin

  • PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions

    Karon F. Cook;Sally E. Jensen;Benjamin D. Schalet;Jennifer L. Beaumont

  • Initial Severity and Differential Treatment Outcome in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program

    Irene Elkin;Robert D. Gibbons;M. Tracie Shea;Stuart M. Sotsky

  • Characteristics of effective therapists: further analyses of data from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

    Sidney J. Blatt;Charles A. Sanislow;David C. Zuroff;Paul A. Pilkonis

  • Treatment expectancies, patient alliance, and outcome: further analyses from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program

    Bjorn Meyer;Paul A. Pilkonis;Janice L. Krupnick;Matthew K. Egan

  • Impact of perfectionism and need for approval on the brief treatment of depression: the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program revisited.

    Blatt Sj;Quinlan Dm;Pilkonis Pa;Shea Mt

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephanie D. Stepp
Stephanie D. Stepp University of Pittsburgh
Aidan G. C. Wright
Aidan G. C. Wright University of Pittsburgh
Michael N. Hallquist
Michael N. Hallquist Pennsylvania State University
Jennifer Q. Morse
Jennifer Q. Morse University of Pittsburgh
David Cella
David Cella Northwestern University
David J. Kupfer
David J. Kupfer University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Ellen Frank
Ellen Frank University of Pittsburgh
Joshua D. Miller
Joshua D. Miller University of Georgia
Irene Elkin
Irene Elkin University of Chicago
Daniel J. Buysse
Daniel J. Buysse University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse online programs and meaningful career pathways. Many students pursue an online master’s or doctorate to qualify for advanced roles in counseling and therapy. However, licensure is essential for practicing as a professional counselor in most states, and requirements can vary significantly.

For example, aspiring counselors should familiarize themselves with the lpc licensure requirements in Ohio if they wish to practice there. Similarly, those interested in counseling careers should learn how to get an lpc license in Oregon as well as the specific process for how to get an lpc license in Oklahoma. Each state sets its own standards in areas such as educational background, supervised clinical hours, and examination protocols.

If you are considering a career in Pennsylvania, make sure to review the lpc license requirements in Pennsylvania before beginning your studies. Understanding these requirements early helps you choose the right online degree program and prepares you for a successful transition into the counseling field.

Best Scientists Citing Paul A. Pilkonis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles