David S. Tulsky mostly deals with Psychometrics, Developmental psychology, Physical therapy, Quality of life and Quality of life. David S. Tulsky has researched Psychometrics in several fields, including Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and Traumatic brain injury. His Developmental psychology research includes elements of Neuropsychological test and Cognition, NIH Toolbox.
His work carried out in the field of Cognition brings together such families of science as Test validity and Cognitive psychology. His Physical therapy research includes elements of Cancer, Longitudinal study, Clinical trial, Spinal cord injury and Neurological status. His research integrates issues of Item response theory, Psychiatry and Physical medicine and rehabilitation in his study of Quality of life.
His primary areas of investigation include Psychometrics, Rehabilitation, Physical therapy, Clinical psychology and Item response theory. David S. Tulsky has researched Psychometrics in several fields, including Reliability, Quality of life, Cognition and Traumatic brain injury. His research on Rehabilitation also deals with topics like
His Physical therapy research incorporates elements of Sample and Spinal cord injury. His Clinical psychology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Test validity, Discriminant validity and Anxiety. His Item response theory research integrates issues from Confirmatory factor analysis and Computerized adaptive testing.
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Rehabilitation, Clinical psychology, Item response theory, Quality of life and Psychometrics. His Rehabilitation study necessitates a more in-depth grasp of Physical therapy. The various areas that he examines in his Clinical psychology study include Confirmatory factor analysis, Discriminant validity, Vigilance and Anxiety.
His work deals with themes such as Computerized adaptive testing, Equating and Functional Independence Measure, which intersect with Item response theory. David S. Tulsky works mostly in the field of Quality of life, limiting it down to topics relating to Veterans Affairs and, in certain cases, Burnout, Feeling and Activities of daily living, as a part of the same area of interest. His Psychometrics research focuses on Cross-sectional study and how it connects with Cognition.
His main research concerns Rehabilitation, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Patient-reported outcome, Physical therapy and Traumatic brain injury. His work on Rehabilitation is being expanded to include thematically relevant topics such as Item response theory. His Patient-reported outcome research incorporates themes from Quality of life and Clinical psychology.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Discriminant validity and Convergent validity in addition to Quality of life. His studies deal with areas such as Young adult, Spinal cord injury, Psychometrics and Objective test as well as Physical therapy. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Reliability and Emergency medicine.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure.
D F Cella;D S Tulsky;G Gray;B Sarafian.
Journal of Clinical Oncology (1993)
Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox
Sandra Weintraub;Sureyya S. Dikmen;Robert K. Heaton;David S. Tulsky.
Neurology (2013)
Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument *
David F. Cella;Amy E. Bonomi;Stephen R. Lloyd;David S. Tulsky.
Lung Cancer (1995)
Is speed of processing or working memory the primary information processing deficit in multiple sclerosis
John DeLuca;Gordon J. Chelune;David S. Tulsky;Jean Lengenfelder.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (2004)
Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research
Elisabeth A. Wilde;Gale Gibson Whiteneck;Jennifer A. Bogner;Tamara Bushnik.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2010)
Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument
Wendy L. Ward;Elizabeth A. Hahn;Fei Mo;Lesbia Hernandez.
Quality of Life Research (1999)
Symptoms of major depression in people with spinal cord injury: implications for screening.
Charles H. Bombardier;J. Scott Richards;James S. Krause;David Tulsky.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2004)
Late neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury.
Steven Kirshblum;Steven Kirshblum;Scott Millis;William McKinley;David Tulsky.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2004)
Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: A qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities
Joy Hammel;Susan Magasi;Allen W. Heinemann;Allen W. Heinemann;David B. Gray.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2015)
Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions.
Melannie S. Alexander;K. D. Anderson;F. Biering-Sorensen;A. R. Blight.
Spinal Cord (2009)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
Northwestern University
Baylor College of Medicine
Northwestern University
Wayne State University
MGH Institute of Health Professions
Kessler Foundation
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
University of California, San Diego
Northwestern University
University of California, Davis
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Carlos III University of Madrid
South China University of Technology
University of Trento
Monash University
University of Tübingen
Keio University
South China Normal University
Yale University
University of California, San Diego
London School of Economics and Political Science
Universität Hamburg
University of Houston
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany)
Princeton University
University of Liverpool