World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
22351
World Ranking
3790
National Ranking
2121

David S. Tulsky publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. Tulsky sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 213 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

David S. Tulsky D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. Tulsky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David S. Tulsky is affiliated with the University of Delaware in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with a significant number of publications totaling 53. Within this broad field, Tulsky's work covers several subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Surgery, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The main topics of Tulsky's research encompass various areas related to physical disability and rehabilitation. These include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders, Spinal Cord Injury Research, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research, and Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques.

Tulsky's research has been published in a variety of academic venues. Notably, they have contributed extensively to the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation with 10 publications. Other frequent venues include Quality of Life Research, PsycTESTS Dataset, Autism Research, and the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

Co-authorship is a significant aspect of Tulsky's work, collaborating repeatedly with several researchers. Frequent co-authors include Pamela A. Kisala, Aaron J. Boulton, Callie E. Tyner, Angelle M. Sander, and Jerry Slotkin.

Among Tulsky's recent scholarly publications are:

  • "The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale: Development and Validation of the General Measure," 2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease," 2020, Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
  • "A further study of relations between motor impairment and social communication, cognitive, language, functional impairments, and repetitive behavior severity in children with ASD using the SPARK study dataset," 2022, Autism Research
  • "Reproductive Health in Women with Physical Disability: A Conceptual Framework for the Development of New Patient-Reported Outcome Measures," 2020, Journal of Women's Health
  • "Effect of parental education and household poverty on recovery after traumatic brain injury in school-aged children," 2021, Brain Injury

Best Publications

  • The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure.

    D F Cella;D S Tulsky;G Gray;B Sarafian

  • Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox

    Sandra Weintraub;Sureyya S. Dikmen;Robert K. Heaton;David S. Tulsky

  • Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument *

    David F. Cella;Amy E. Bonomi;Stephen R. Lloyd;David S. Tulsky

  • Longitudinal relations between children's exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood: 1977-1992.

    Unknown

  • Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research

    Elisabeth A. Wilde;Gale Gibson Whiteneck;Jennifer A. Bogner;Tamara Bushnik

  • Is speed of processing or working memory the primary information processing deficit in multiple sclerosis

    John DeLuca;Gordon J. Chelune;David S. Tulsky;Jean Lengenfelder

  • Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument

    Wendy L. Ward;Elizabeth A. Hahn;Fei Mo;Lesbia Hernandez

  • Reliability and Validity of Composite Scores from the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in Adults

    Robert K. Heaton;Natacha Akshoomoff;David Tulsky;Dan M Mungas

  • Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: A qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities

    Joy Hammel;Susan Magasi;Allen W. Heinemann;David B. Gray

  • Symptoms of major depression in people with spinal cord injury: implications for screening.

    Charles H. Bombardier;J. Scott Richards;James S. Krause;David Tulsky

  • Late neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury.

    Steven Kirshblum;Steven Kirshblum;Scott Millis;William McKinley;David Tulsky

  • The cognition battery of the NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function: Validation in an adult sample

    Sandra Weintraub;Sureyya S. Dikmen;Robert K. Heaton;David S. Tulsky;David S. Tulsky

  • VIII. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): composite scores of crystallized, fluid, and overall cognition.

    Natacha Akshoomoff;Jennifer L. Beaumont;Patricia J. Bauer;Sureyya S. Dikmen

  • Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions.

    Melannie S. Alexander;K. D. Anderson;F. Biering-Sorensen;A. R. Blight

  • I. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): introduction and pediatric data.

    Sandra Weintraub;Patricia J. Bauer;Philip David Zelazo;Kathleen Wallner-Allen

  • Memory span on the Wechsler Scales.

    Nancy J. Wilde;Esther Strauss;David S. Tulsky

  • NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB): list sorting test to measure working memory.

    David S. Tulsky;David S. Tulsky;Noelle Carlozzi;Nancy D. Chiaravalloti;Jennifer L. Beaumont

  • Overview of the Spinal Cord Injury--Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system

    David S. Tulsky;David S. Tulsky;Pamela A. Kisala;David Victorson;Denise G. Tate

  • The joint WAIS-III and WMS-III factor structure: Development and cross-validation of a six-factor model of cognitive functioning

    David S. Tulsky;Larry R. Price

  • Criterion validity of new WAIS–III subtest scores after traumatic brain injury

    Jacobus Donders;David S. Tulsky;Jianjun Zhu

  • The case for an international patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®) initiative

    Jordi Alonso;Susan J Bartlett;Matthias Rose;Matthias Rose;Neil K Aaronson

  • The Wechsler Memory Scale, Third Edition: A New Perspective

    David S. Tulsky;Nancy D. Chiaravalloti;Barton W. Palmer;Gordon J. Chelune

Frequent Co-Authors

Noelle E. Carlozzi
Noelle E. Carlozzi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Angelle M. Sander
Angelle M. Sander Baylor College of Medicine
Richard Gershon
Richard Gershon Northwestern University
Robin A. Hanks
Robin A. Hanks Wayne State University
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti Kessler Foundation
Louis M. French
Louis M. French United States Army Research Laboratory
Robert K. Heaton
Robert K. Heaton University of California, San Diego
Rael T. Lange
Rael T. Lange Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Dan M Mungas
Dan M Mungas University of California, Davis
Sandra Weintraub
Sandra Weintraub Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens up a range of online degree options and career pathways, especially for those interested in becoming licensed therapists. Completing an accredited online program is often the first step to pursuing licensure in various locations.

The process of becoming a licensed therapist in Gilbert typically involves earning a relevant degree, gaining supervised clinical experience, and passing the required licensing examination. While the core requirements are similar across the country, specific state regulations may vary.

For example, the licensed therapist requirements in Glendale highlight the importance of state-approved education and ongoing professional development. Meanwhile, aspiring professionals can review the licensed therapist requirements in Greensboro to understand the local licensing expectations there.

Additionally, if you are researching how to become a licensed therapist in Henderson, you'll discover that counseling pathways often include specific coursework, background checks, and adherence to ethical standards. No matter your location, an online Psychology degree can be an important step toward a rewarding counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing David S. Tulsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles