World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
106
Citations
62711
World Ranking
457
National Ranking
295

Arthur A. Stone publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur A. Stone sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 282 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Arthur A. Stone D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur A. Stone sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arthur A. Stone is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with significant contributions to Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their work often addresses topics related to Behavioral Health and Interventions, Mental Health Research Topics, and Health Disparities and Outcomes. Other focal areas include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation, Pain Management and Placebo Effect, as well as Aging and Gerontology Research.

Arthur A. Stone has published extensively across a variety of venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Pain
  • PLoS ONE
  • Pain
  • JMIR Formative Research

Collaborations with other researchers have been a notable part of their career. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Stefan Schneider
  • Doerte U. Junghaenel
  • Pey-Jiuan Lee
  • Raymond Hernandez
  • Joshua M. Smyth

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on ecological momentary assessment and pain research. Selected recent publications are:

  • Evaluation of Pressing Issues in Ecological Momentary Assessment (2022), published in Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • Decoding the mystery of American pain reveals a warning for the future (2020), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Evaluation of Item Candidates: The PROMIS Qualitative Item Review (2021), published in UNC Libraries
  • High-resolution, field approaches for assessing pain: Ecological Momentary Assessment (2020), published in Pain
  • Influence of ecological momentary assessment study design features on reported willingness to participate and perceptions of potential research studies: an experimental study (2021), published in BMJ Open

Best Publications

  • Ecological Momentary Assessment

    Saul Shiffman;Arthur A. Stone;Michael R. Hufford

  • The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008

    David Cella;William Riley;Arthur Stone;Nan Rothrock

  • A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method

    Daniel Kahneman;Alan B. Krueger;David A. Schkade;Norbert Schwarz

  • Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing

    Andrew Steptoe;Angus Deaton;Arthur A Stone;Arthur A Stone

  • Ecological Momentary Assessment (Ema) in Behavioral Medicine

    Arthur A. Stone;Saul Shiffman

  • Would You Be Happier If You Were Richer? A Focusing Illusion

    Daniel Kahneman;Alan B. Krueger;David Schkade;Norbert Schwarz

  • New measure of daily coping: Development and preliminary results.

    Arthur A. Stone;John M. Neale

  • Effects of Writing About Stressful Experiences on Symptom Reduction in Patients With Asthma or Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Trial

    Joshua M. Smyth;Arthur A. Stone;Adam Hurewitz;Alan Kaell

  • The Science of Self-report : Implications for Research and Practice

    Arthur A. Stone;Jaylan S. Turkkan;Christine A. Bachrach;Jared B. Jobe

  • Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries

    Arthur A Stone;Saul Shiffman;Joseph E Schwartz;Joan E Broderick

  • Patient non-compliance with paper diaries

    Arthur A Stone;Saul Shiffman;Joseph E Schwartz;Joan E Broderick

  • A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States

    Arthur A. Stone;Joseph E. Schwartz;Joan E. Broderick;Angus Deaton

  • Toward National Well-Being Accounts

    Daniel Kahneman;Alan B. Krueger;David Schkade;Norbert Schwarz

  • Capturing momentary, self-report data: a proposal for reporting guidelines.

    Arthur A. Stone;Saul Shiffman

  • Persistent high cortisol responses to repeated psychological stress in a subpopulation of healthy men.

    Clemens Kirschbaum;Jens C. Prüssner;Arthur A. Stone;Ilona Federenko

  • Evaluation of Item Candidates: The PROMIS Qualitative Item Review

    Darren A. DeWalt;Nan Rothrock;Susan Yount;Arthur A. Stone

  • Emotional reactivity to daily life stress in psychosis.

    Inez Myin-Germeys;Jim van Os;Joseph E. Schwartz;Arthur A. Stone

  • STRATEGIES FOR ANALYZING ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT DATA

    Joseph E. Schwartz;Arthur A. Stone

  • Emotional expression and physical health: revising traumatic memories or fostering self-regulation?

    Melanie A. Greenberg;Camille B. Wortman;Arthur A. Stone

  • Emotional disclosure about traumas and its relation to health : effects of previous disclosure and trauma severity

    Melanie A. Greenberg;Arthur A. Stone

  • The science of self-report. Implications for research and practice

    Vera Hoorens;A. A. Stone;J. S. Turkkan;C. A. Bachrach

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph E. Schwartz
Joseph E. Schwartz Stony Brook University
John M. Neale
John M. Neale Stony Brook University
Saul Shiffman
Saul Shiffman University of Pittsburgh
Joshua M. Smyth
Joshua M. Smyth Pennsylvania State University
Alan B. Krueger
Alan B. Krueger Princeton University
Angus Deaton
Angus Deaton Princeton University
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
David Cella
David Cella Northwestern University
Daniel Kahneman
Daniel Kahneman Princeton University
Laura S. Porter
Laura S. Porter Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding career pathways. Many students expand their options by considering related degrees such as social work, counseling, or human services. These fields offer the opportunity to make a meaningful impact, as well as flexibility through online degree programs tailored for busy schedules.

Becoming a social worker is a popular choice for psychology graduates. The process involves specific educational and licensing requirements, which can vary by state. For example, if you’re considering this path, learn about how to become a social worker in New Jersey or explore the requirements to be a social worker in New Mexico. Each state outlines unique steps, from accredited degree completion to supervised fieldwork.

Additional guidance for aspiring professionals can be found by researching how to become a social worker in New York or understanding North Carolina social work license requirements. These resources provide crucial state-specific insights, helping you plan your education and career advancement with confidence.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur A. Stone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles