World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
14336
World Ranking
5574
National Ranking
3043

John M. Neale publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Neale sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 128 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John M. Neale D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Neale sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John M. Neale was affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research predominantly focused on engineering and environmental science, with specific contributions in building and construction as well as environmental engineering.

The scientist's recent work includes the paper titled "Accurate identification of influential building parameters through an integration of global sensitivity and feature selection techniques," published in 2022 in the journal Applied Energy. This publication addressed critical aspects of building energy and comfort optimization and sustainable building design and assessment. The paper has been cited 29 times, indicating engagement from the scholarly community.

Their main fields of study comprised:

  • Engineering
  • Environmental Science

The subfields of study covered:

  • Building and Construction
  • Environmental Engineering

John M. Neale's research topics included:

  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Wind and Air Flow Studies

Throughout their career, Neale collaborated frequently with various co-authors. These included:

  • Mohammad Haris Shamsi
  • Eleni Mangina
  • Donal Finn
  • James O'Donnell

Regarding publication venues, Neale's work was notably published in the journal Applied Energy, representing their primary outlet for disseminating research findings related to their field.

Best Publications

  • Abnormal psychology : an experimental clinical approach

    Gerald C. Davison;John M. Neale

  • New measure of daily coping: Development and preliminary results.

    Arthur A. Stone;John M. Neale

  • Individual differences in dispositional expressiveness: Development and validation of the Emotional Expressivity Scale.

    Ann M. Kring;David A. Smith;John M. Neale

  • Emotion perception in schizophrenia: Specific deficit or further evidence of generalized poor performance?

    Sandra L. Kerr;John M. Neale

  • The Pupil Evaluation Inventory. A sociometric technique for assessing children's social behavior.

    Eugene G. Pekarik;Ronald J. Prinz;Diane E. Liebert;Sheldon Weintraub

  • A comparison of coping assessed by ecological momentary assessment and retrospective recall.

    Arthur A. Stone;Joseph E. Schwartz;John M. Neale;Saul Shiffman

  • Do Schizophrenic Patients Show a Disjunctive Relationship Among Expressive, Experiential, and Psychophysiological Components of Emotion?

    Ann M. Kring;John M. Neale

  • Flat affect in schizophrenia does not reflect diminished subjective experience of emotion.

    Ann M. Kring;Sandra L. Kerr;David A. Smith;John M. Neale

  • Evidence that secretory IgA antibody is associated with daily mood.

    Arthur A. Stone;Donald S. Cox;Heiddis Valdimarsdottir;Lina Jandorf

  • Self-focused attention, coping responses, and distressed mood in everyday life.

    Joanne V. Wood;Judith A. Saltzberg;John M. Neale;Arthur A. Stone

  • Schizophrenic performance when distractors are present: attentional deficit or differential task difficulty?

    Thomas F. Oltmanns;John M. Neale

  • The neuropsychological signature of schizophrenia: generalized or differential deficit?

    Jack J. Blanchard;John M. Neale

  • Daily events are associated with a secretory immune response to an oral antigen in men.

    Arthur A. Stone;John M. Neale;Donald S. Cox;Anthony Napoli

  • Klinische Psychologie : ein Lehrbuch

    Gerald C. Davison;John M. Neale;Martin Hautzinger;Maria Baur

  • Mania and low self-esteem.

    Ken C. Winters;John M. Neale

  • Association between daily coping and end-of-day mood.

    Arthur A. Stone;Eileen Kennedy-Moore;John M. Neale

  • Does trait coping exist? A momentary assessment approach to the evaluation of traits.

    Jopseph E. Schwartz;John Neale;Chris Marco;Saul S. Shiffman

  • Delusions and delusional thinking in psychotics: A review of the literature

    Ken C. Winters;John M. Neale

  • Development of common cold symptoms following experimental rhinovirus infection is related to prior stressful life events.

    Arthur A. Stone;Dana H. Bovbjerg;John M. Neale;Anthony Napoli

  • Effects of severe daily events on mood.

    Arthur A. Stone;John M. Neale

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur A. Stone
Arthur A. Stone University of Southern California
Gerald C. Davison
Gerald C. Davison University of Southern California
Ann M. Kring
Ann M. Kring University of California, Berkeley
Thomas F. Oltmanns
Thomas F. Oltmanns Washington University in St. Louis
Ken C. Winters
Ken C. Winters Oregon Research Institute
Sheri L. Johnson
Sheri L. Johnson University of California, Berkeley
Saul Shiffman
Saul Shiffman University of Pittsburgh
Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir
Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Joseph E. Schwartz
Joseph E. Schwartz Stony Brook University
Jill M. Hooley
Jill M. Hooley Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology opens up diverse career options in social work and counseling across the United States. Each state often has unique requirements and pathways you should consider. For example, becoming a social worker in Wisconsin requires specific licensing steps, along with dedicated fieldwork and education credentials.

If you’re interested in the western U.S., understanding the requirements to be a social worker in Wyoming is crucial, as these can vary significantly from other states. Similarly, students aiming to enter the counseling field quickly can explore regional opportunities like Alabama accelerated counseling programs and Alaska accelerated counseling programs.

Online programs often provide flexible options to help you meet state-specific requirements while balancing other commitments. Researching your desired career and state regulations early can help you find the most efficient education path to your chosen psychology-related profession.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Neale

Recently Published Articles