World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
64
Citations
20500
World Ranking
1083
National Ranking
504

Dagmar Amtmann publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dagmar Amtmann sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 216 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Dagmar Amtmann D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dagmar Amtmann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dagmar Amtmann is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and specializes in medical research. Their work primarily spans the field of medicine, with significant contributions to epidemiology, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, public health, environmental and occupational health, psychiatry, mental health, and pharmacology.

Amtmann's research covers a range of topics related to health and rehabilitation, including musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, burn injury management and outcomes, cerebral palsy and movement disorders, injury epidemiology and prevention, multiple sclerosis research studies, pain management and placebo effect, and traumatic brain injury research.

Frequent coauthors in Amtmann's publications include Alyssa M. Bamer, Kara McMullen, Rana Salem, Jeffrey C Schneider, and Mark P. Jensen.

Amtmann has published extensively in various academic journals and venues. The main publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Burn Care & Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Pain
  • Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

Among recent papers involving Amtmann's authorship are the following:

  • "Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis," 2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • "Development and validation of an interpretive guide for PROMIS scores," 2020, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • "Clinical outcome assessment in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments," 2021, PAIN Reports
  • "mHealth and patient generated health data: stakeholder perspectives on opportunities and barriers for transforming healthcare," 2020, mHealth
  • "Proceedings from the Consensus Conference on Trauma Patient-Reported Outcome Measures," 2020, Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Best Publications

  • The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008

    David Cella;William Riley;Arthur Stone;Nan Rothrock

  • Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference

    Dagmar Amtmann;Karon F. Cook;Mark P. Jensen;Wen Hung Chen

  • Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain

    Richard A. Deyo;Samuel F. Dworkin;Dagmar Amtmann;Gunnar Andersson

  • PROMIS® Adult Health Profiles: Efficient Short-Form Measures of Seven Health Domains.

    David Cella;Seung W. Choi;David M. Condon;Benjamin David Schalet

  • PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions

    Karon F. Cook;Sally E. Jensen;Benjamin D. Schalet;Jennifer L. Beaumont

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • Having a Fit: Impact of Number of Items and Distribution of Data on Traditional Criteria for Assessing IRT’s Unidimensionality Assumption

    Karon F. Cook;Michael A. Kallen;Dagmar Amtmann

  • Development of six PROMIS pediatrics proxy-report item banks

    Debra E. Irwin;Heather E. Gross;Brian Dale Stucky;David Thissen

  • Falls in multiple sclerosis.

    Patricia N. Matsuda;Anne Shumway-Cook;Alyssa M. Bamer;Shana L. Johnson

  • Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice.

    Virginia W. Berninger;Dagmar Amtmann

  • Measuring Communicative Participation: A Review of Self-Report Instruments in Speech-Language Pathology

    Tanya L. Eadie;Kathryn M. Yorkston;Estelle R. Klasner;Brian J. Dudgeon

  • The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB): Item Bank Calibration and Development of a Disorder-Generic Short Form

    Carolyn Baylor;Kathryn Yorkston;Tanya Eadie;Jiseon Kim

  • Comparing CESD-10, PHQ-9, and PROMIS Depression Instruments in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

    Dagmar Amtmann;Jiseon Kim;Hyewon Chung;Alyssa M. Bamer

  • Prevalence of sleep problems in individuals with multiple sclerosis

    Alyssa M. Bamer;K. L. Johnson;D. Amtmann;G. H. Kraft

  • Development and psychometric analysis of the PROMIS pain behavior item bank

    Dennis A. Revicki;Wen Hung Chen;Neesha Harnam;Karon F. Cook

  • Electronic Self-Report Assessment for Cancer and Self-Care Support: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Trial

    Donna L. Berry;Fangxin Hong;Barbara Halpenny;Anne H. Partridge

  • Symptom Burden in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury

    Mark P. Jensen;Carrie M. Kuehn;Dagmar Amtmann;Diane D. Cardenas

  • Comparison of the psychometric properties of two fatigue scales in multiple sclerosis.

    Dagmar Amtmann;Alyssa M. Bamer;Vanessa Noonan;Nina Lang

  • The cost and benefits of employment: a qualitative study of experiences of persons with multiple sclerosis.

    Kurt L Johnson;Kathryn M Yorkston;Estelle R Klasner;Carrie M Kuehn

  • Evidence from diverse clinical populations supported clinical validity of PROMIS pain interference and pain behavior

    Robert L. Askew;Karon Frances Cook;Dennis A. Revicki;David Cella

  • Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation.

    Brian J. Hafner;Ignacio A. Gaunaurd;Sara J. Morgan;Dagmar Amtmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Karon F. Cook
Karon F. Cook Northwestern University
Kathryn M. Yorkston
Kathryn M. Yorkston University of Washington
Nicole S. Gibran
Nicole S. Gibran University of Washington
Mark P. Jensen
Mark P. Jensen University of Washington
Dawn M. Ehde
Dawn M. Ehde University of Washington
Dennis C. Turk
Dennis C. Turk University of Washington
David Cella
David Cella Northwestern University
Jin Shei Lai
Jin Shei Lai Northwestern University
David N. Herndon
David N. Herndon The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens a variety of rewarding online study options and career pathways. Many students are opting for an online msw to start or boost their careers in social work, benefiting from programs that offer flexibility and affordability. For those interested in supporting individuals with behavioral challenges, pursuing a bcba degree can lead to roles as Board Certified Behavior Analysts.

Students aiming for quicker entry into the workforce now have access to accelerated programs. An accelerated social work degree lets you complete your studies faster without sacrificing academic quality. Similarly, those drawn to the study of the mind can take advantage of an accelerated psychology degree online to quickly gain credentials and begin working in counseling, research, or public service.

Whether you’re looking to advance in your current field or launch a new career, these online programs offer accessible and practical routes into impactful areas of social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Dagmar Amtmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles