World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 64 1083 945 504 430 216 20500

Dagmar Amtmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dagmar Amtmann between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dagmar Amtmann published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2014. 4 of the 252 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2014. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
1997 2026

252 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dagmar Amtmann: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 2
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 6
2004 3
2005 0
2006 4
2007 7
2008 10
2009 7
2010 9
2011 4
2012 13
2013 13
2014 26
2015 20
2016 17
2017 12
2018 18
2019 12
2020 23
2021 16
2022 11
2023 7
2024 6
2025 3
2026 1
Total 252
Download as CSV

Dagmar Amtmann publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dagmar Amtmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 214–223 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 216 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246 216
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Dagmar Amtmann D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dagmar Amtmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79 64
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Dagmar Amtmann is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and specializes in medical research. Their work primarily spans the field of medicine, with significant contributions to epidemiology, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, public health, environmental and occupational health, psychiatry, mental health, and pharmacology.

Amtmann's research covers a range of topics related to health and rehabilitation, including musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, burn injury management and outcomes, cerebral palsy and movement disorders, injury epidemiology and prevention, multiple sclerosis research studies, pain management and placebo effect, and traumatic brain injury research.

Frequent coauthors in Amtmann's publications include Alyssa M. Bamer, Kara McMullen, Rana Salem, Jeffrey C Schneider, and Mark P. Jensen.

Amtmann has published extensively in various academic journals and venues. The main publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Burn Care & Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Pain
  • Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

Among recent papers involving Amtmann's authorship are the following:

  • "Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis," 2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • "Development and validation of an interpretive guide for PROMIS scores," 2020, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • "Clinical outcome assessment in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments," 2021, PAIN Reports
  • "mHealth and patient generated health data: stakeholder perspectives on opportunities and barriers for transforming healthcare," 2020, mHealth
  • "Proceedings from the Consensus Conference on Trauma Patient-Reported Outcome Measures," 2020, Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Best Publications

  • The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008

    David Cella;William Riley;Arthur Stone;Nan Rothrock

  • Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference

    Dagmar Amtmann;Karon F. Cook;Mark P. Jensen;Wen Hung Chen

  • Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain

    Richard A. Deyo;Samuel F. Dworkin;Dagmar Amtmann;Gunnar Andersson

  • PROMIS® Adult Health Profiles: Efficient Short-Form Measures of Seven Health Domains.

    David Cella;Seung W. Choi;David M. Condon;Benjamin David Schalet

  • PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions

    Karon F. Cook;Sally E. Jensen;Benjamin D. Schalet;Jennifer L. Beaumont

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • Having a Fit: Impact of Number of Items and Distribution of Data on Traditional Criteria for Assessing IRT’s Unidimensionality Assumption

    Karon F. Cook;Michael A. Kallen;Dagmar Amtmann

  • Development of six PROMIS pediatrics proxy-report item banks

    Debra E. Irwin;Heather E. Gross;Brian Dale Stucky;David Thissen

  • Falls in multiple sclerosis.

    Patricia N. Matsuda;Anne Shumway-Cook;Alyssa M. Bamer;Shana L. Johnson

  • Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice.

    Virginia W. Berninger;Dagmar Amtmann

  • Measuring Communicative Participation: A Review of Self-Report Instruments in Speech-Language Pathology

    Tanya L. Eadie;Kathryn M. Yorkston;Estelle R. Klasner;Brian J. Dudgeon

  • The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB): Item Bank Calibration and Development of a Disorder-Generic Short Form

    Carolyn Baylor;Kathryn Yorkston;Tanya Eadie;Jiseon Kim

  • Comparing CESD-10, PHQ-9, and PROMIS Depression Instruments in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

    Dagmar Amtmann;Jiseon Kim;Hyewon Chung;Alyssa M. Bamer

  • Prevalence of sleep problems in individuals with multiple sclerosis

    Alyssa M. Bamer;K. L. Johnson;D. Amtmann;G. H. Kraft

  • Development and psychometric analysis of the PROMIS pain behavior item bank

    Dennis A. Revicki;Wen Hung Chen;Neesha Harnam;Karon F. Cook

  • Electronic Self-Report Assessment for Cancer and Self-Care Support: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Trial

    Donna L. Berry;Fangxin Hong;Barbara Halpenny;Anne H. Partridge

  • Symptom Burden in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury

    Mark P. Jensen;Carrie M. Kuehn;Dagmar Amtmann;Diane D. Cardenas

  • Comparison of the psychometric properties of two fatigue scales in multiple sclerosis.

    Dagmar Amtmann;Alyssa M. Bamer;Vanessa Noonan;Nina Lang

  • The cost and benefits of employment: a qualitative study of experiences of persons with multiple sclerosis.

    Kurt L Johnson;Kathryn M Yorkston;Estelle R Klasner;Carrie M Kuehn

  • Evidence from diverse clinical populations supported clinical validity of PROMIS pain interference and pain behavior

    Robert L. Askew;Karon Frances Cook;Dennis A. Revicki;David Cella

  • Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation.

    Brian J. Hafner;Ignacio A. Gaunaurd;Sara J. Morgan;Dagmar Amtmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Karon F. Cook
Karon F. Cook Northwestern University
Kathryn M. Yorkston
Kathryn M. Yorkston University of Washington
Nicole S. Gibran
Nicole S. Gibran University of Washington
Mark P. Jensen
Mark P. Jensen University of Washington
Dawn M. Ehde
Dawn M. Ehde University of Washington
Dennis C. Turk
Dennis C. Turk University of Washington
David Cella
David Cella Northwestern University
Jin Shei Lai
Jin Shei Lai Northwestern University
David N. Herndon
David N. Herndon The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens a variety of rewarding online study options and career pathways. Many students are opting for an online msw to start or boost their careers in social work, benefiting from programs that offer flexibility and affordability. For those interested in supporting individuals with behavioral challenges, pursuing a bcba degree can lead to roles as Board Certified Behavior Analysts.

Students aiming for quicker entry into the workforce now have access to accelerated programs. An accelerated social work degree lets you complete your studies faster without sacrificing academic quality. Similarly, those drawn to the study of the mind can take advantage of an accelerated psychology degree online to quickly gain credentials and begin working in counseling, research, or public service.

Whether you’re looking to advance in your current field or launch a new career, these online programs offer accessible and practical routes into impactful areas of social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Dagmar Amtmann

Trending Scientists