World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 57 1724 1547 50 40 300 21098

Matthias Rose publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthias Rose between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthias Rose published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 17 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2017. 66 of the 494 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2017. 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 40 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 31 publications 2024: 36 publications 2025: 30 publications
1997 2025

494 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthias Rose: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 3
1998 1
1999 2
2000 5
2001 6
2002 8
2003 9
2004 11
2005 15
2006 2
2007 4
2008 5
2009 11
2010 6
2011 9
2012 9
2013 15
2014 26
2015 30
2016 33
2017 40
2018 27
2019 19
2020 34
2021 31
2022 36
2023 31
2024 36
2025 30
Total 494
Download as CSV

Matthias Rose publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Rose sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 294–303 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 300 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106 300
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthias Rose D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Rose sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129 57
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthias Rose is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany, focusing primarily on medical research. Their academic work spans 179 publications within the field of Medicine, with significant contributions across several subfields and specialized topics.

The subfields in which Matthias Rose has published extensively include:

  • Oncology
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Sensory Systems
  • General Health Professions

Key research topics covered in their work feature:

  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Cancer Survivorship and Care
  • Vestibular and Auditory Disorders
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Delphi Technique in Research

Frequent publication venues for Matthias Rose include the following journals:

  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • European Journal of Cancer
  • Value in Health

Their recent papers illustrate a diverse range of research interests and include:

  • "Effect of Hemodiafiltration or Hemodialysis on Mortality in Kidney Failure" (2023), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Studying the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019: a protocol for the Berlin prospective COVID-19 patient cohort (Pa-COVID-19)" (2020), published in Infection
  • "Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol" (2020), published in BMJ Open
  • "Updated EORTC QLQ-C30 general population norm data for Germany" (2020), published in European Journal of Cancer
  • "Telemonitoring in patients with chronic heart failure and moderate depressed symptoms: results of the Telemedical Interventional Monitoring in Heart Failure (TIM-HF) study" (2020), published in European Journal of Heart Failure

Matthias Rose collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Felix Fischer
  • Gregor Liegl
  • Birgit Mazurek
  • Krister Cromm
  • Petra Brüeggemann

Best Publications

  • The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008

    David Cella;William Riley;Arthur Stone;Nan Rothrock

  • A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: Validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population.

    Bernd Löwe;Inka Wahl;Matthias Rose;Carsten Spitzer

  • The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances

    Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer;Michael Herdman;Janine Devine;Christiane Otto

  • The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) reconsidered: validation and reference values from different clinical and healthy adult samples.

    Herbert Fliege;Matthias Rose;Petra Arck;Otto B Walter

  • Social support during pregnancy: effects on maternal depressive symptoms, smoking and pregnancy outcome

    S. Elsenbruch;S. Benson;M. Rücke;M. Rose

  • Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

    M. Rose;Jakob B. Bjorner;J. Becker;J. F. Fries

  • General population normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 health-related quality of life questionnaire based on 15,386 persons across 13 European countries, Canada and the Unites States.

    Sandra Nolte;Sandra Nolte;G Liegl;MA Petersen;NK Aaronson

  • The PROMIS Physical Function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency

    Matthias S. F. Rose;Matthias S. F. Rose;Jakob B. Bjorner;Barbara Gandek;Bonnie Bruce

  • The Network of Psychological Variables in Patients With Diabetes and Their Importance for Quality of Life and Metabolic Control

    Matthias Rose;Herbert Fliege;Martin Hildebrandt;Thea Schirop

  • Role of stress in functional gastrointestinal disorders. Evidence for stress-induced alterations in gastrointestinal motility and sensitivity.

    H. Mönnikes;J.J. Tebbe;M. Hildebrandt;P. Arck

  • Early risk factors for miscarriage: a prospective cohort study in pregnant women

    Petra C Arck;Mirjam Rücke;Matthias Rose;Julia Szekeres-Bartho

  • Validierung des “Perceived Stress Questionnaire“ (PSQ) an einer deutschen Stichprobe

    Herbert Fliege;Matthias Rose;Petra Arck;Susan Levenstein

  • Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder: findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group

    L. Schmaal;D.J. Veltman;T.G.M. van Erp;P.G. Sämann

  • Development of a computer-adaptive test for depression (D-CAT).

    Herbert Fliege;Janine Becker;Otto B. Walter;Jakob B. Bjorner

  • [The short version of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI -18): preliminary psychometric properties of the German translation].

    Carsten Spitzer;S Hammer;Bernd Löwe;H J Grabe

  • Effects of an Internet intervention (Deprexis) on severe depression symptoms: Randomized controlled trial

    Björn Meyer;Julia Bierbrodt;Johanna Schröder;Thomas Berger

  • Standardization of depression measurement: a common metric was developed for 11 self-report depression measures.

    Inka Wahl;Bernd Löwe;Jakob Bue Bjorner;Felix Fischer

  • Stress and immune mediators in miscarriage.

    P C Arck;M Rose;K Hertwig;E Hagen

  • Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples

    Matthias Rose;Andrea Bezjak

  • The PROMIS of better outcome assessment: responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and Internet administration.

    James Fries;Matthias Rose;Eswar Krishnan

  • Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Commentaries

    John E. Ware;M. Rose;J. B. Bjomer;J. Becker

Frequent Co-Authors

Burghard F. Klapp
Burghard F. Klapp Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Bernd Löwe
Bernd Löwe Universität Hamburg
Jakob B. Bjorner
Jakob B. Bjorner University of Copenhagen
Björn Meyer
Björn Meyer City, University of London
Steffen Moritz
Steffen Moritz University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Johanna Schröder
Johanna Schröder Medical School Hamburg
Wolfgang Lutz
Wolfgang Lutz University of Trier
James F. Fries
James F. Fries Stanford University
Martin Hautzinger
Martin Hautzinger University of Tübingen
Fritz Hohagen
Fritz Hohagen University of Lübeck

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA can open doors to diverse online degrees and career options in counseling, psychology, social work, and family therapy. Choosing the right academic path is crucial, especially when it comes to accreditation and program reputation.

If you’re interested in becoming a counselor, it’s important to consider cacrep accreditation. This ensures your counseling program meets industry standards, which can impact your career prospects and eligibility for licensure.

Students who want to support couples and families may look into mft programs. These programs offer specialized skills in Marriage and Family Therapy, preparing graduates for rewarding roles in clinical and community settings.

For those interested in understanding human behavior, an online psychology degree can lead to roles in mental health, education, research, and human resources. Online options make this field more accessible than ever.

If you aim to become a social worker, you may want to focus on the easiest msw programs to get into. These programs help you enter the profession quickly while still meeting essential educational and licensing requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Rose

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles