World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 34 12180 11824 4948 4725 116 4946

Amy Hurst publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amy Hurst between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amy Hurst published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2014. 6 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2014. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1996 2025

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amy Hurst: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 6
2002 6
2003 2
2004 3
2005 3
2006 2
2007 3
2008 3
2009 1
2010 2
2011 2
2012 7
2013 7
2014 12
2015 7
2016 11
2017 11
2018 10
2019 9
2020 9
2021 8
2022 4
2023 11
2024 4
2025 2
Total 146
Download as CSV

Amy Hurst publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Hurst sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 112–121 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 116 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497 116
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Amy Hurst D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Hurst sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918 34
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Amy Hurst is affiliated with New York University in the United States and has a research focus spanning neuroscience and social sciences. Their work encompasses a range of topics related to neural dynamics, digital accessibility, tactile and sensory interactions, and innovative human-technology interaction.

The main fields of study for Amy Hurst include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences

Their subfields of study show a multidisciplinary approach involving cognitive neuroscience, human-computer interaction, cellular and molecular neuroscience, human factors and ergonomics, and cell biology.

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Cell Biology

Research topics covered by Amy Hurst reflect the intersection of neuroscience and accessibility with an emphasis on assistive technologies and tactile sensory methods in both biomedical and communication domains.

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction

Amy Hurst has published in several journals and venues, reflecting contributions to both the neuroscience and accessibility research communities. Frequent publication venues include:

  • ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
  • The International Journal of the Inclusive Museum
  • eLife
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Neural Circuits

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Amy Hurst are:

  • Precisely timed dopamine signals establish distinct kinematic representations of skilled movements, 2020, eLife
  • Accessible Web Development, 2021, ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
  • Precisely-timed dopamine signals establish distinct kinematic representations of skilled movements, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Interactions Between Motor Thalamic Field Potentials and Single-Unit Spiking Are Correlated With Behavior in Rats, 2020, Frontiers in Neural Circuits
  • Understanding Accessible Interpretation through Touch Object Practices in Museums, 2023, The International Journal of the Inclusive Museum

Frequent co-authors with whom Amy Hurst has collaborated include:

  • Matt Gaidica
  • Daniel Leventhal
  • William Payne
  • Alexandra Bova
  • Yoshiko Iwai

Amy Hurst was recognized as an ACM Senior Member in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology

    Amy Hurst;Jasmine Tobias

  • Sotto voce: exploring the interplay of conversation and mobile audio spaces

    Paul M. Aoki;Rebecca E. Grinter;Amy Hurst;Margaret H. Szymanski

  • Feedback mechanism for use with visual selection methods

    Paul M. Aoki;Richard R. Burton;Amy K. Hurst;Allison G. Woodruff

  • Revisiting the visit: understanding how technology can shape the museum visit

    Rebecca E. Grinter;Paul M. Aoki;Margaret H. Szymanski;James D. Thornton

  • Breakaway: an ambient display designed to change human behavior

    Nassim Jafarinaimi;Jodi Forlizzi;Amy Hurst;John Zimmerman

  • Sharing is Caring: Assistive Technology Designs on Thingiverse

    Erin Buehler;Stacy Branham;Abdullah Ali;Jeremy J. Chang

  • ABC and 3D: opportunities and obstacles to 3D printing in special education environments

    Erin Buehler;Shaun K. Kane;Amy Hurst

  • Electronic Guidebooks and Visitor Attention.

    Allison Woodruff;Paul M. Aoki;Amy Hurst;Margaret H. Szymanski

  • "Pray before you step out": describing personal and situational blind navigation behaviors

    Michele A. Williams;Amy Hurst;Shaun K. Kane

  • Infotropism: living and robotic plants as interactive displays

    David Holstius;John Kembel;Amy Hurst;Peng-Hui Wan

  • Investigating the Implications of 3D Printing in Special Education

    Erin Buehler;Niara Comrie;Megan Hofmann;Samantha McDonald

  • Making "making" accessible

    Amy Hurst;Shaun Kane

  • "just let the cane hit it": how the blind and sighted see navigation differently

    Michele A. Williams;Caroline Galbraith;Shaun K. Kane;Amy Hurst

  • VizTouch: automatically generated tactile visualizations of coordinate spaces

    Craig Brown;Amy Hurst

  • The perceptive workbench: Computer-vision-based gesture tracking, object tracking, and 3D reconstruction for augmented desks

    Thad Starner;Bastian Leibe;David Minnen;Tracy Westyn

  • Wearables and chairables: inclusive design of mobile input and output techniques for power wheelchair users

    Patrick Carrington;Amy Hurst;Shaun K. Kane

  • Dynamic detection of novice vs. skilled use without a task model

    Amy Hurst;Scott E. Hudson;Jennifer Mankoff

  • Crowdsourcing subjective fashion advice using VizWiz: challenges and opportunities

    Michele A. Burton;Erin Brady;Robin Brewer;Callie Neylan

  • Everyday making: identifying future uses for 3D printing in the home

    Rita Shewbridge;Amy Hurst;Shaun K. Kane

  • Coming to grips: 3D printing for accessibility

    Erin Buehler;Amy Hurst;Megan Hofmann

  • An empirical investigation of the situationally-induced impairments experienced by blind mobile device users

    Ali Abdolrahmani;Ravi Kuber;Amy Hurst

Frequent Co-Authors

Shaun K. Kane
Shaun K. Kane Google (United States)
Paul M. Aoki
Paul M. Aoki Google (United States)
Allison Woodruff
Allison Woodruff Google (United States)
Jennifer Mankoff
Jennifer Mankoff University of Washington
Scott E. Hudson
Scott E. Hudson Carnegie Mellon University
Jodi Forlizzi
Jodi Forlizzi Carnegie Mellon University
Leah Findlater
Leah Findlater University of Washington
Rebecca E. Grinter
Rebecca E. Grinter Georgia Institute of Technology
John Zimmerman
John Zimmerman Carnegie Mellon University
Meredith Ringel Morris
Meredith Ringel Morris Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education has made it easier than ever to pursue a degree in computer science or related fields, especially for students seeking flexibility and affordability. Prospective students can explore options among the most affordable online colleges, which offer high-quality programs at accessible tuition rates.

Admission requirements can be a concern for some. Fortunately, there are college that accepts low gpa to help students with non-traditional academic backgrounds start their journey in higher education. These institutions provide a valuable opportunity for those looking to upskill or change careers.

For those interested in fields beyond computer science, an environmental science degree can also open doors to a wide array of career paths, both online and in-person.

Students eager to complete their education swiftly should consider the accelerated computer science degree route, which allows for faster graduation and quicker entry into the workforce. With a range of options available, online degrees offer diverse pathways to professional success in tech and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Amy Hurst

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles