World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
5723
World Ranking
12074
National Ranking
4919

Paul M. Aoki publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Aoki sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 80 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Paul M. Aoki D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Aoki sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul M. Aoki is affiliated with Google in the United States. Their work is linked to this primary affiliation, reflecting a connection to industry research and development environments in the U.S.

Although specific publications and detailed research outputs are not provided, the profile indicates an ongoing active presence in the academic and professional community through their association with Google.

No recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues have been recorded in the available data, which limits detailed discussion of collaborative networks or publishing patterns.

The absence of listed main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work precludes a precise description of research interests or specialization areas within scientific domains.

There are no books or awards attributed to Paul M. Aoki within the provided information, which means no additional academic honors or authored monographs can be reported.

This profile is based solely on the affiliation and basic identifying information without detailed data on scientific contributions, publications, or collaborative activities.

Best Publications

  • Common Sense: participatory urban sensing using a network of handheld air quality monitors

    Prabal Dutta;Paul M. Aoki;Neil Kumar;Alan Mainwaring

  • Mariposa: a wide-area distributed database system

    Michael Stonebraker;Paul M. Aoki;Witold Litwin;Avi Pfeffer

  • Sotto voce: exploring the interplay of conversation and mobile audio spaces

    Paul M. Aoki;Rebecca E. Grinter;Amy Hurst;Margaret H. Szymanski

  • Computer-implemented system and method for enhancing visual representation to individuals participating in a conversation

    Paul M. Aoki;Margaret H. Szymanski;James Thornton;Daniel H. Wilson

  • Feedback mechanism for use with visual selection methods

    Paul M. Aoki;Richard R. Burton;Amy K. Hurst;Allison G. Woodruff

  • Revisiting the visit: understanding how technology can shape the museum visit

    Rebecca E. Grinter;Paul M. Aoki;Margaret H. Szymanski;James D. Thornton

  • A vehicle for research: using street sweepers to explore the landscape of environmental community action

    Paul M. Aoki;R. J. Honicky;Alan Mainwaring;Chris Myers

  • Making space for stories: ambiguity in the design of personal communication systems

    Paul M. Aoki;Allison Woodruff

  • An investigation of documents from the World Wide Web

    Allison Woodruff;Paul M. Aoki;Eric Brewer;Paul Gauthier

  • Electronic Guidebooks and Visitor Attention.

    Allison Woodruff;Paul M. Aoki;Amy Hurst;Margaret H. Szymanski

  • Mariposa: a new architecture for distributed data

    M. Stonebraker;P.M. Aoki;R. Devine;W. Litwin

  • Common sense community: scaffolding mobile sensing and analysis for novice users

    Wesley Willett;Paul Aoki;Neil Kumar;Sushmita Subramanian

  • System And Method For Providing Multimedia Content Between A Plurality Of User Terminals

    James Douglass Thornton;Rebecca Elizabeth Grinter;Paul Masami Aoki;Allison Gyle Woodruff

  • Data replication in Mariposa

    J. Sidell;P.M. Aoki;A. Sah;C. Staelin

  • Folding electronic apparatus and system with continuous display

    Aoki Paul M;Woodruff Allison G

  • Slide-out information display

    Paul M. Aoki

  • Generalizing "search" in generalized search trees

    P.M. Aoki

  • Detecting user engagement in everyday conversations.

    Chen Yu;Paul M. Aoki;Allison Woodruff

  • Deliberate interactions: characterizing technology use in Nairobi, Kenya

    Susan P. Wyche;Thomas N. Smyth;Marshini Chetty;Paul M. Aoki

  • System and method for providing communication channels that each comprise at least one property dynamically changeable during social interactions

    Allison G. Woodruff;Paul M. Aoki;Margaret H. Szymanski;James D. Thornton

Frequent Co-Authors

Allison Woodruff
Allison Woodruff Google (United States)
Rebecca E. Grinter
Rebecca E. Grinter Georgia Institute of Technology
Amy Hurst
Amy Hurst New York University
Chen Yu
Chen Yu The University of Texas at Austin
Eric Paulos
Eric Paulos University of California, Berkeley
W. Keith Edwards
W. Keith Edwards Georgia Institute of Technology
Matei Zaharia
Matei Zaharia University of California, Berkeley
Witold Litwin
Witold Litwin Paris Dauphine University
Prabal Dutta
Prabal Dutta University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering studying Computer Science in the USA, you may also want to explore related online degrees and alternative career pathways that can boost your prospects. For those interested in broadening technical skills beyond computing, an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering is a flexible way to gain expertise in both hardware and software industries.

Short on time or looking to quickly enter the job market? Pursuing certifications for jobs can open entry-level opportunities with strong salaries, often without the lengthy commitment of a full degree.

For those wishing to advance their careers rapidly, there are quickest masters degree online programs available. These accelerated options help you earn an advanced credential in as little as one year.

Choosing the right program matters—a degree from one of the most worthwhile masters degrees listings can boost employability and long-term earning potential in the fast-changing tech sector.

Best Scientists Citing Paul M. Aoki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles