World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
5150
World Ranking
13058
National Ranking
455

Oliviero Stock publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliviero Stock sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 198 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Oliviero Stock D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliviero Stock sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For wide-ranging, significant contributions to research in computational linguistics and intelligent interfaces, serious work on computational humor, and dedicated service and leadership in support of the European AI community.

Overview

Oliviero Stock is affiliated with the Fondazione Bruno Kessler in Italy. Their research spans several interconnected fields, notably Arts and Humanities, Psychology, and Social Sciences, with a particular focus on various subfields such as General Health Professions, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Philosophy.

The main topics explored in their work include media influence and health, bullying, victimization, and aggression, social and intergroup psychology, hermeneutics and narrative identity, aging, elder care, and social issues, as well as language, metaphor, and cognition.

They have coauthored papers with several researchers, including Shani Fachter, Gianluca Schiavo, Keren L. G. Snider, Alessandro Cappelletti, and Patrice L. Weiss.

Oliviero Stock's publications appear across a variety of venues such as Technology in Society, CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Pisa), and Language Resources and Evaluation.

Some recent papers include:

  • "Come and share a story with me": Promoting engagement between Ethiopian and Non-Ethiopian Israelis via joint digital narratives, 2021, published in Technology in Society
  • Forum: Law and Artificial Intelligence, 2020, published in CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Pisa)
  • Pragmatic evaluations of automated linguistic creativity, 2021, published in Language Resources and Evaluation

Oliviero Stock was recognized as a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) in 2006 for contributions to computational linguistics, intelligent interfaces, computational humor, and support for the European AI community.

Best Publications

  • Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems

    Peter Brusilovsky;Oliviero Stock;Carlo Strapparava

  • Adaptive, intelligent presentation of information for the museum visitor in PEACH

    Oliviero Stock;Massimo Zancanaro;Paolo Busetta;Charles Callaway

  • A visitor's guide in an active museum: Presentations, communications, and reflection

    Tsvi Kuflik;Oliviero Stock;Massimo Zancanaro;Ariel Gorfinkel

  • Developing Affective Lexical Resources

    Alessandro Valitutti;Carlo Strapparava;Oliviero Stock

  • Enhancing social communication of children with high-functioning autism through a co-located interface

    Eynat Gal;Nirit Bauminger;Dina Goren-Bar;Fabio Pianesi

  • Spatial and Temporal Reasoning

    Oliviero Stock

  • Future research issues in IT and tourism

    Hannes Werthner;Aurkene Alzua-Sorzabal;Lorenzo Cantoni;Astrid Dickinger

  • The museum visit: generating seamless personalized presentations on multiple devices

    C. Rocchi;O. Stock;M. Zancanaro;M. Kruppa

  • The Affective Weight of Lexicon.

    Carlo Strapparava;Alessandro Valitutti;Oliviero Stock

  • An integrative framework for extending the boundaries of the museum visit experience: linking the pre, during and post visit phases

    Tsvi Kuflik;Alan J. Wecker;Joel Lanir;Oliviero Stock

  • Computational Creativity: Coming of Age

    Simon Colton;Ramon Lopez de Mantaras;Oliviero Stock

  • Computational humor

    K. Binsted;A. Nijholt;O. Stock;C. Strapparava

  • Getting serious about the development of computational humor

    Oliviero Stock;Carlo Strapparava

  • Peach - Intelligent Interfaces For Museum Visits

    Oliviero Stock;Massimo Zancanaro;Peach

  • The Influence of a Location-Aware Mobile Guide on Museum Visitors' Behavior

    Joel Lanir;Tsvi Kuflik;Eyal Dim;Alan J. Wecker

  • HAHAcronym: Humorous Agents for Humorous Acronyms

    Oliviero Stock;Carlo Strapparava

  • Technical Note Hypernavigation in the physical space: adapting presentations to the user and to the situational context

    Elena Not;Daniela Petrelli;Marcello Sarini;Oliviero Stock

  • Multimodal intelligent information presentation

    Oliviero Stock;Massimo Zancanaro

  • Natural language and exploration of an information space: the ALFresco interactive system

    Oliviero Stock

  • Modelling and Adapting to Context

    Daniela Petrelli;Elena Not;Massimo Zancanaro;Carlo Strapparava

  • Intelligent Interactive Information Presentation for Cultural Tourism

    Oliviero Stock;Elena Not;Massimo Zancanaro

  • Parsing with flexibility, dynamic strategies, and idioms in mind

    Oliviero Stock

Frequent Co-Authors

Massimo Zancanaro
Massimo Zancanaro University of Trento
Carlo Strapparava
Carlo Strapparava Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Tsvi Kuflik
Tsvi Kuflik University of Haifa
Fabio Pianesi
Fabio Pianesi Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Wolfgang Wahlster
Wolfgang Wahlster German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence
Antonio Krüger
Antonio Krüger German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence
Robert Dale
Robert Dale Macquarie University
Peter Brusilovsky
Peter Brusilovsky University of Pittsburgh
Anton Nijholt
Anton Nijholt University of Twente
Daniela Petrelli
Daniela Petrelli Polytechnic University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up a world of flexible, affordable options for aspiring computer science students. Starting with an online associate's degree offers a foundation in computer science and can quickly lead to numerous entry-level tech careers or transfer opportunities for further study.

Financial concerns are a common barrier, but many institutions provide cheap online college classes that make earning a credential more accessible. These budget-friendly options can be ideal for students looking to minimize debt while gaining valuable skills.

If GPA is a concern, there are best colleges for low gpa applicants that offer supportive environments and flexible admission requirements. This creates more pathways for individuals with varied academic backgrounds to succeed in the field.

A computer science background also opens doors to interdisciplinary careers. For example, understanding what can you do with an environmental science major shows how computing skills are vital in fields like data analytics, environmental modeling, and sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Oliviero Stock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles