World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carlo Strapparava

Carlo Strapparava

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
11717
World Ranking
8627
National Ranking
235

Carlo Strapparava publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlo Strapparava sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 199 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Carlo Strapparava D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlo Strapparava sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carlo Strapparava is affiliated with Fondazione Bruno Kessler in Italy and has a research focus spanning computer science and psychology, with significant contributions in artificial intelligence and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics, including social networks, language, and computational methods. Notable works include:

  • "Exploring Text Virality in Social Networks," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "A Cross-Modal and Cross-lingual Study of Iconicity in Language: Insights From Deep Learning," 2022, Cognitive Science
  • "Exploiting native language interference for native language identification," 2020, Natural Language Engineering
  • "Festschrift in honor of Oliviero Stock-- Preface," 2020, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
  • "Pragmatic evaluations of automated linguistic creativity," 2021, Language Resources and Evaluation

Frequent coauthors in Strapparava's work include:

  • Gözde Özbal (3 collaborations)
  • Andrea Gregor de Varda (3 collaborations)
  • Marco Guerini (1 collaboration)
  • Ilia Markov (1 collaboration)
  • Vivi Năstase (1 collaboration)

Strapparava has published primarily in these venues:

  • Cognitive Science (2 publications)
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (1 publication)
  • Natural Language Engineering (1 publication)
  • Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (1 publication)
  • Language Resources and Evaluation (1 publication)

The scientist's research topics reflect a multidisciplinary approach, addressing areas such as:

  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Topic Modeling
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Categorization, perception, and language
  • Action Observation and Synchronization

Main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Psychology

Subfields where Strapparava contributes prominently are:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Best Publications

  • WordNet Affect: an Affective Extension of WordNet

    Carlo Strapparava;Alessandro Valitutti

  • Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity

    Rada Mihalcea;Courtney Corley;Carlo Strapparava

  • SemEval-2007 Task 14: Affective Text

    Carlo Strapparava;Rada Mihalcea

  • Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems

    Peter Brusilovsky;Oliviero Stock;Carlo Strapparava

  • Learning to identify emotions in text

    Carlo Strapparava;Rada Mihalcea

  • The Lie Detector: Explorations in the Automatic Recognition of Deceptive Language

    Rada Mihalcea;Carlo Strapparava

  • Making Computers Laugh: Investigations in Automatic Humor Recognition

    Rada Mihalcea;Carlo Strapparava

  • The role of domain information in Word Sense Disambiguation

    Bernardo Magnini;Carlo Strapparava;Giovanni Pezzulo;Alfio Gliozzo

  • Developing Affective Lexical Resources

    Alessandro Valitutti;Carlo Strapparava;Oliviero Stock

  • LEARNING TO LAUGH (AUTOMATICALLY): COMPUTATIONAL MODELS FOR HUMOR RECOGNITION

    Rada Mihalcea;Carlo Strapparava

  • Improving User Modelling with Content-Based Techniques

    Bernardo Magnini;Carlo Strapparava

  • The Affective Weight of Lexicon.

    Carlo Strapparava;Alessandro Valitutti;Oliviero Stock

  • Semantic Domains in Computational Linguistics

    Alfio Gliozzo;Carlo Strapparava

  • Exploring Text Virality in Social Networks

    Marco Guerini;Carlo Strapparava;Gözde Özbal

  • Computational humor

    K. Binsted;A. Nijholt;O. Stock;C. Strapparava

  • Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text

    Diana Inkpen;Carlo Strapparava

  • Domain Kernels for Word Sense Disambiguation

    Alfio Gliozzo;Claudio Giuliano;Carlo Strapparava

  • Getting serious about the development of computational humor

    Oliviero Stock;Carlo Strapparava

  • HAHAcronym: Humorous Agents for Humorous Acronyms

    Oliviero Stock;Carlo Strapparava

  • Technical Note Hypernavigation in the physical space: adapting presentations to the user and to the situational context

    Elena Not;Daniela Petrelli;Marcello Sarini;Oliviero Stock

  • Pattern abstraction and term similarity for Word Sense Disambiguation: IRST at Senseval-3

    Carlo Strapparava;Alfio Gliozzo;Claudio Giuliano

  • Unsupervised and supervised exploitation of semantic domains in lexical disambiguation

    Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo;Carlo Strapparava;Ido Dagan

Frequent Co-Authors

Oliviero Stock
Oliviero Stock Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Rada Mihalcea
Rada Mihalcea University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Massimo Zancanaro
Massimo Zancanaro University of Trento
Bernardo Magnini
Bernardo Magnini Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Daniela Petrelli
Daniela Petrelli Polytechnic University of Milan
Ido Dagan
Ido Dagan Bar-Ilan University
Peter Brusilovsky
Peter Brusilovsky University of Pittsburgh
Diana Inkpen
Diana Inkpen University of Ottawa
Eneko Agirre
Eneko Agirre University of the Basque Country
Giovanni Pezzulo
Giovanni Pezzulo National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree programs can open up flexible and affordable avenues for advancing your career in computer science and related fields. Many students start with the easiest associate degree to get, allowing them to quickly gain foundational skills or transfer credits to a bachelor’s program.

For those interested in leadership or advanced research, pursuing edd programs online offers a convenient path to doctoral credentials without having to relocate or disrupt your current work schedule.

Choosing the right online institution is crucial. Reviewing the best online schools ensures you’ll receive a quality education from an accredited source, which is key to future job prospects and further studies.

If you’re interested in creative tech fields, consider programs such as an online school for game design, which blend programming with digital artistry. These specialized degrees offer unique career pathways in the booming video game industry.

Best Scientists Citing Carlo Strapparava

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles