World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Canada
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
61
Citations
19389
World Ranking
3020
National Ranking
114

Saif M. Mohammad publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Saif M. Mohammad sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 136 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Saif M. Mohammad D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Saif M. Mohammad sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Canada Leader Award
  • 2004 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Saif M. Mohammad is affiliated with the National Research Council Canada. Their research principally spans the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on Artificial Intelligence. Other subfields addressed include Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Information Systems, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

Mohammad's work often explores topics such as Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, Topic Modeling, and Natural Language Processing Techniques. Mental Health via Writing and Mental Health Research Topics are also noticeable areas of study. Additionally, they investigate Advanced Text Analysis Techniques and Humor Studies and Applications within their research scope.

The scientist has published extensively, with a frequent presence in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Computational Linguistics, Nature Reviews Psychology, and the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Ethics Sheet for Automatic Emotion Recognition and Sentiment Analysis, 2022, Computational Linguistics
  • Using natural language processing to analyse text data in behavioural science, 2025, Nature Reviews Psychology
  • AfriSenti: A Twitter Sentiment Analysis Benchmark for African Languages, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Practical and Ethical Considerations in the Effective use of Emotion and Sentiment Lexicons, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Examining the language of solitude versus loneliness in tweets, 2021, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Collaboration plays a role in their research activities. Frequent co-authors include Jan Philip Wahle, Béla Gipp, Krishnapriya Vishnubhotla, Terry Ruas, and Mahmoud A. Abdalla.

Mohammad has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 2004.

Best Publications

  • CROWDSOURCING A WORD–EMOTION ASSOCIATION LEXICON

    Saif M. Mohammad;Peter D. Turney

  • Emotions Evoked by Common Words and Phrases: Using Mechanical Turk to Create an Emotion Lexicon

    Saif Mohammad;Peter Turney

  • NRC-Canada: Building the State-of-the-Art in Sentiment Analysis of Tweets

    Saif Mohammad;Svetlana Kiritchenko;Xiaodan Zhu

  • Sentiment analysis of short informal texts

    Svetlana Kiritchenko;Xiaodan Zhu;Saif M. Mohammad

  • SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets

    Saif Mohammad;Svetlana Kiritchenko;Parinaz Sobhani;Xiaodan Zhu

  • NRC-Canada-2014: Detecting Aspects and Sentiment in Customer Reviews

    Svetlana Kiritchenko;Xiaodan Zhu;Colin Cherry;Saif Mohammad

  • SemEval-2018 Task 1: Affect in Tweets

    Saif Mohammad;Felipe Bravo-Marquez;Mohammad Salameh;Svetlana Kiritchenko

  • Obtaining Reliable Human Ratings of Valence, Arousal, and Dominance for 20,000 English Words

    Saif Mohammad

  • Emotional Tweets

    Saif Mohammad

  • Using Hashtags to Capture Fine Emotion Categories from Tweets

    Saif M. Mohammad;Svetlana Kiritchenko

  • Stance and Sentiment in Tweets

    Saif M. Mohammad;Parinaz Sobhani;Svetlana Kiritchenko

  • Sentiment Analysis: Detecting Valence, Emotions, and Other Affectual States from Text

    Saif M. Mohammad

  • Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systems

    Svetlana Kiritchenko;Saif M. Mohammad

  • SemEval-2015 Task 10: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter

    Sara Rosenthal;Preslav Nakov;Svetlana Kiritchenko;Saif Mohammad

  • Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation

    Marianna Apidianaki;Saif M. Mohammad;Jonathan May;Ekaterina Shutova

  • Generating High-Coverage Semantic Orientation Lexicons From Overtly Marked Words and a Thesaurus

    Saif Mohammad;Cody Dunne;Bonnie Dorr

  • Sentiment, emotion, purpose, and style in electoral tweets

    Saif M. Mohammad;Xiaodan Zhu;Svetlana Kiritchenko;Joel Martin

  • WASSA-2017 Shared Task on Emotion Intensity

    Saif M. Mohammad;Felipe Bravo-Márquez

  • SemEval-2012 Task 2: Measuring Degrees of Relational Similarity

    David Jurgens;Saif Mohammad;Peter Turney;Keith Holyoak

  • Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017)

    Steven Bethard;Marine Carpuat;Marianna Apidianaki;Saif M. Mohammad

  • SemEval-2015 Task 10: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter

    Sara Rosenthal;Saif M Mohammad;Preslav Nakov;Alan Ritter

Frequent Co-Authors

Svetlana Kiritchenko
Svetlana Kiritchenko National Research Council Canada
Xiaodan Zhu
Xiaodan Zhu Queen's University
Bonnie J. Dorr
Bonnie J. Dorr University of Florida
Graeme Hirst
Graeme Hirst University of Toronto
Peter D. Turney
Peter D. Turney Ronin Institute
Colin Cherry
Colin Cherry Google (Canada)
Dragomir R. Radev
Dragomir R. Radev Yale University
Preslav Nakov
Preslav Nakov Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Steven Bethard
Steven Bethard University of Arizona
Robert J. Coplan
Robert J. Coplan Carleton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open up flexible and diverse career opportunities in computer science and related fields. For those looking to quickly enter the workforce, consider enrolling in one of the shortest associate degree program options. These programs allow students to gain foundational technical skills in less time and at a lower cost than traditional degrees.

For aspiring educators, pursuing an online ed doctorate can lead to advanced teaching and leadership roles within academic or training environments. It’s important to select institutions known for credibility and robust online support; reviewing the best online colleges ensures your degree will be recognized and respected by employers.

Additionally, those passionate about gaming and interactive media may want to explore a video game design degree. This field blends creativity with technical expertise and offers strong growth potential as the industry expands.

Best Scientists Citing Saif M. Mohammad

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles