World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
36869
World Ranking
11857
National Ranking
4835

Myle Ott publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Myle Ott sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 72 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Myle Ott D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Myle Ott sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Myle Ott is a researcher affiliated with Facebook in the United States, specializing primarily in computer science with a focus on artificial intelligence. Their work spans several subfields including computer vision and pattern recognition, molecular biology, computer networks and communications, and hardware and architecture. The predominant areas of study relate to advanced computational techniques in artificial intelligence and related domains.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Myle Ott are:

  • "Towards Learning Terminological Concept Systems from Multilingual Natural Language Text," 2021, published at Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • "Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Analysing Off-The-Shelf Options for Question Answering with Portuguese FAQs," 2022, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • "Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunities," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "PyTorch FSDP: Experiences on Scaling Fully Sharded Data Parallel," 2023, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

The frequent collaborators in their body of work include:

  • Sam Shleifer
  • Naman Goyal
  • Jingfei Du
  • Luke Zettlemoyer
  • Mikel Artetxe

Myle Ott's publications have appeared primarily in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Best Publications

  • RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach

    Yinhan Liu;Myle Ott;Naman Goyal;Jingfei Du

  • Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale

    Alexis Conneau;Kartikay Khandelwal;Naman Goyal;Vishrav Chaudhary

  • Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences

    Alexander Rives;Alexander Rives;Joshua Meier;Tom Sercu;Siddharth Goyal

  • fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modeling

    Myle Ott;Sergey Edunov;Alexei Baevski;Angela Fan

  • Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination

    Myle Ott;Yejin Choi;Claire Cardie;Jeffrey T. Hancock

  • Understanding Back-Translation at Scale.

    Sergey Edunov;Myle Ott;Michael Auli;David Grangier

  • OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models

    Unknown

  • Phrase-Based & Neural Unsupervised Machine Translation

    Guillaume Lample;Myle Ott;Alexis Conneau;Ludovic Denoyer

  • Recipes for building an open-domain chatbot

    Stephen Roller;Emily Dinan;Naman Goyal;Da Ju

  • Scaling Neural Machine Translation

    Myle Ott;Sergey Edunov;David Grangier;Michael Auli

  • Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale.

    Alexis Conneau;Kartikay Khandelwal;Naman Goyal;Vishrav Chaudhary

  • Biological Structure and Function Emerge from Scaling Unsupervised Learning to 250 Million Protein Sequences

    Alexander Rives;Siddharth Goyal;Joshua Meier;Demi Guo

  • Towards a General Rule for Identifying Deceptive Opinion Spam

    Jiwei Li;Myle Ott;Claire Cardie;Eduard Hovy

  • Negative Deceptive Opinion Spam

    Myle Ott;Claire Cardie;Jeffrey T. Hancock

  • Estimating the prevalence of deception in online review communities

    Myle Ott;Claire Cardie;Jeff Hancock

  • Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunities.

    Carole-Jean Wu;Ramya Raghavendra;Udit Gupta;Bilge Acun

  • Facebook FAIR’s WMT19 News Translation Task Submission

    Nathan Ng;Kyra Yee;Alexei Baevski;Myle Ott

  • Multi-aspect Sentiment Analysis with Topic Models

    Bin Lu;Myle Ott;Claire Cardie;Benjamin K. Tsou

  • Recipes for building an open-domain chatbot

    Stephen Roller;Emily Dinan;Naman Goyal;Da Ju

  • The FLORES Evaluation Datasets for Low-Resource Machine Translation: Nepali–English and Sinhala–English

    Francisco Guzmán;Peng-Jen Chen;Myle Ott;Juan Miguel Pino

  • Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Generative Language Models

    Unknown

  • PyTorch FSDP: Experiences on Scaling Fully Sharded Data Parallel

    Unknown

  • fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modeling.

    Myle Ott;Sergey Edunov;Alexei Baevski;Angela Fan

  • Classical Structured Prediction Losses for Sequence to Sequence Learning.

    Sergey Edunov;Myle Ott;Michael Auli;David Grangier

  • Pretrained Language Models for Biomedical and Clinical Tasks: Understanding and Extending the State-of-the-Art.

    Patrick S. H. Lewis;Myle Ott;Jingfei Du;Veselin Stoyanov

  • Phrase-Based & Neural Unsupervised Machine Translation.

    Guillaume Lample;Myle Ott;Alexis Conneau;Ludovic Denoyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc'Aurelio Ranzato
Marc'Aurelio Ranzato DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Michael Auli
Michael Auli Facebook (United States)
Claire Cardie
Claire Cardie Cornell University
David Grangier
David Grangier Google (United States)
Jeffrey T. Hancock
Jeffrey T. Hancock Stanford University
Arthur Szlam
Arthur Szlam DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Veselin Stoyanov
Veselin Stoyanov Facebook (United States)
Alexis Conneau
Alexis Conneau Facebook (United States)
Luke Zettlemoyer
Luke Zettlemoyer University of Washington
Jason Weston
Jason Weston Facebook (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up a wide variety of online learning options. Many students begin their journey with 2 year online degrees, which offer flexible study schedules and a fast track into the tech job market. These programs are ideal for those seeking foundational skills before advancing to a bachelor’s degree.

Cost is a common concern when pursuing higher education. Thankfully, there are affordable online colleges that let you earn your degree without straining your finances, making tech careers more accessible than ever. Additionally, if your grades haven’t been perfect, don’t worry—there are also best colleges for low gpa that provide quality education opportunities, ensuring that motivated students can succeed regardless of academic history.

Beyond computer science, skills in technology can lead to other exciting fields. For instance, if you’re passionate about sustainability, you might explore what roles are available with a related degree by reading: what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree. The pathways are diverse—choose the one that aligns with your goals and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Myle Ott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles