World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
91
Citations
49762
World Ranking
565
National Ranking
302

Tie-Yan Liu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tie-Yan Liu sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 538 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Tie-Yan Liu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tie-Yan Liu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to machine learning for web search and online advertising
  • 2016 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2012 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Tie-Yan Liu is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence. Their research spans multiple subfields, including artificial intelligence, molecular biology, computer vision and pattern recognition, signal processing, and computational theory and mathematics.

The main topics of their work include natural language processing techniques, topic modeling, speech recognition and synthesis, computational drug discovery methods, protein structure and dynamics, machine learning in materials science, and music and audio processing.

Tie-Yan Liu has published numerous papers in various venues, with a substantial number appearing on arXiv (Cornell University). Other notable publication venues include the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Briefings in Bioinformatics, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and the IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

Some of the recent papers by Tie-Yan Liu are:

  • Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence (2023), Nature
  • BioGPT: generative pre-trained transformer for biomedical text generation and mining (2022), Briefings in Bioinformatics
  • R-Drop: Regularized Dropout for Neural Networks (2021), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • A Survey on Neural Speech Synthesis (2021), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Incorporating BERT into Neural Machine Translation (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)

Collaborations have been a significant aspect of their work, with frequent co-authors including Tao Qin, Yingce Xia, Tong Wang, Shufang Xie, and Lijun Wu.

Tie-Yan Liu has been recognized through several professional distinctions. Notably, they were named an IEEE Fellow in 2017 for contributions to machine learning for web search and online advertising. They were also designated an ACM Distinguished Member in 2016 and an ACM Senior Member in 2012.

Best Publications

  • LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree

    Guolin Ke;Qi Meng;Thomas Finley;Taifeng Wang

  • Learning to Rank for Information Retrieval

    Tie-Yan Liu

  • Learning to rank: from pairwise approach to listwise approach

    Zhe Cao;Tao Qin;Tie-Yan Liu;Ming-Feng Tsai

  • BioGPT: Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation and Mining

    Unknown

  • MASS: Masked Sequence to Sequence Pre-training for Language Generation

    Kaitao Song;Xu Tan;Tao Qin;Jianfeng Lu

  • Listwise approach to learning to rank: theory and algorithm

    Fen Xia;Tie-Yan Liu;Jue Wang;Wensheng Zhang

  • Dual learning for machine translation

    Di He;Yingce Xia;Tao Qin;Liwei Wang

  • FastSpeech: Fast, Robust and Controllable Text to Speech

    Yi Ren;Yangjun Ruan;Xu Tan;Tao Qin

  • Adapting ranking SVM to document retrieval

    Yunbo Cao;Jun Xu;Tie-Yan Liu;Hang Li

  • Learning deep representations for graph clustering

    Fei Tian;Bin Gao;Qing Cui;Enhong Chen

  • Achieving Human Parity on Automatic Chinese to English News Translation

    Hany Hassan;Anthony Aue;Chang Chen;Vishal Chowdhary

  • FastSpeech 2: Fast and High-Quality End-to-End Text to Speech

    Yi Ren;Chenxu Hu;Xu Tan;Tao Qin

  • LETOR: A benchmark collection for research on learning to rank for information retrieval

    Tao Qin;Tie-Yan Liu;Jun Xu;Hang Li

  • MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understanding

    Kaitao Song;Xu Tan;Tao Qin;Jianfeng Lu

  • Neural Architecture Optimization

    Renqian Luo;Fei Tian;Tao Qin;Enhong Chen

  • LETOR: Benchmark Dataset for Research on Learning to Rank for Information Retrieval

    Tie-Yan Liu;Jun Xu;Tao Qin;Wenying Xiong

  • Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation

    Chengxuan Ying;Tianle Cai;Shengjie Luo;Shuxin Zheng

  • On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecture

    Ruibin Xiong;Yunchang Yang;Di He;Kai Zheng

  • Dual Learning for Machine Translation

    Yingce Xia;Di He;Tao Qin;Liwei Wang

  • Sequential click prediction for sponsored search with recurrent neural networks

    Yuyu Zhang;Hanjun Dai;Chang Xu;Jun Feng

  • Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasets.

    Tao Qin;Tie-Yan Liu

  • A Theoretical Analysis of NDCG Type Ranking Measures

    Yining Wang;Liwei Wang;Yuanzhi Li;Di He

  • A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree

    Guolin Ke;Qi Meng;Taifeng Wang;Wei Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Tao Qin
Tao Qin Microsoft (United States)
Xu Tan
Xu Tan Microsoft Research Asia (China)
Hang Li
Hang Li ByteDance
Wei-Ying Ma
Wei-Ying Ma Tsinghua University
Liwei Wang
Liwei Wang Peking University
Zhou Zhao
Zhou Zhao Zhejiang University
Enhong Chen
Enhong Chen University of Science and Technology of China
ChengXiang Zhai
ChengXiang Zhai University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jun Xu
Jun Xu Renmin University of China
James T. Kwok
James T. Kwok Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of computer science offers a wide range of online degree options in the USA. For students seeking flexible learning, many popular online colleges provide nationally accredited computer science and tech-related programs. These institutions cater to both traditional students and working professionals seeking to upskill.

Beyond core computer science degrees, there are specialized programs that align with emerging tech industries. For example, an online game development degree equips students with the creative and technical skills to design interactive gaming experiences. Meanwhile, growing concerns over digital threats have increased demand for online cybersecurity master's programs, which focus on network security and risk management.

Students interested in tech management fields can pursue a construction management degree online. This path blends technical knowledge with leadership abilities, preparing graduates to oversee technology-driven building projects. Exploring these online degree options can open doors to diverse and rewarding career pathways in technology.

Best Scientists Citing Tie-Yan Liu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles