World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7118 6634 3849 3496 83 12458

Scott D. Gest publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott D. Gest between 1988 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott D. Gest published across 37 years, from 1988 to 2024, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2011. 2 of the 89 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2011. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
1988 2024

89 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott D. Gest: publications per year, 1988 to 2024
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 2
1994 0
1995 4
1996 0
1997 2
1998 0
1999 4
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 3
2006 4
2007 1
2008 2
2009 3
2010 5
2011 9
2012 2
2013 7
2014 4
2015 7
2016 5
2017 4
2018 5
2019 6
2020 0
2021 1
2022 1
2023 1
2024 1
Total 89
Download as CSV

Scott D. Gest publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Gest sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 83
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott D. Gest D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Gest sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott D. Gest is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. The primary focus of their research lies within the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a notable emphasis on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Education.

The scholar's work addresses topics related to child and adolescent development, including psychosocial and emotional processes. Core research themes include bullying, victimization, and aggression, as well as early childhood education and development. Additional topics explored are anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, cultural differences and values, and parental involvement in education.

Scott D. Gest's recent publications consist of several articles in peer-reviewed journals spanning from 2020 to 2024. These publications include:

  • "Toddler dysregulated fear predicts continued risk for social anxiety symptoms in early adolescence," 2020, published in Development and Psychopathology
  • "Peer relationships mediate the pathways from behavioral qualities to United States and Chinese children's loneliness," 2023, published in Child Development
  • "Cross-ethnic and same-ethnic friendships in elementary classrooms: Unique associations with school adjustment," 2022, published in Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
  • "Children's friendship stability in the United States, China, and Indonesia: Associations with individual attributes and dyadic similarity," 2024, published in Child Development

The most frequent venues where Gest has published include:

  • Child Development
  • Development and Psychopathology
  • Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Collaboration has been a feature of their research, with recurring co-authors including Junsheng Liu, Dan Li, Doran C. French, Kristin A. Buss, and Sunghye Cho. These partnerships suggest multidisciplinary and cross-institutional engagement.

The researcher's multidisciplinary approach integrates clinical and social psychology perspectives with developmental and educational contexts. This is reflected in the focus on psychosocial development, social dynamics in childhood, and cultural factors influencing emotional and behavioral outcomes in youth populations.

Best Publications

  • Competence in the context of adversity: pathways to resilience and maladaptation from childhood to late adolescence.

    Ann S. Masten;Jon J. Hubbard;Scott D. Gest;Auke Tellegen

  • Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection?

    Robert B. Cairns;Beverley D. Cairns;Holly J. Neckerman;Scott D. Gest

  • Promoting Academic and Social‐Emotional School Readiness: The Head Start REDI Program

    Karen L. Bierman;Celene E. Domitrovich;Robert L. Nix;Scott D. Gest

  • The Structure and Coherence of Competence from Childhood through Adolescence

    Ann S. Masten;J. Douglas Coatsworth;Jennifer Neemann;Scott D. Gest

  • Peer experience: Common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status

    Scott D. Gest;Sandra A. Graham-Bermann;Willard W. Hartup

  • Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies

    Scott David Gest;Philip C. Rodkin

  • Behavioral inhibition: stability and associations with adaptation from childhood to early adulthood.

    Scott D. Gest

  • Fostering High-Quality Teaching With an Enriched Curriculum and Professional Development Support: The Head Start REDI Program

    Celene E. Domitrovich;Scott D. Gest;Sukhdeep Gill;Karen L. Bierman

  • Peers and the Emergence of Alcohol Use: Influence and Selection Processes in Adolescent Friendship Networks

    D. Wayne Osgood;Daniel T. Ragan;Lacey Wallace;Scott D. Gest

  • Behavioral and Cognitive Readiness for School: Cross-Domain Associations for Children Attending Head Start.

    Karen L. Bierman;Marcela M. Torres;Celene E. Domitrovich;Janet A. Welsh

  • A brief method for assessing social development: Structure, reliability, stability, and developmental validity of the Interpersonal Competence Scale

    Robert B. Cairns;Man Chi Leung;Scott D. Gest;Beverley D. Cairns

  • Identifying Children's Peer Social Networks in School Classrooms: Links Between Peer Reports and Observed Interactions

    Scott D. Gest;Thomas W. Farmer;Beverley D. Cairns;Hongling Xie

  • Behavioral predictors of changes in social relatedness and liking school in elementary school

    Scott D. Gest;Janet A. Welsh;Celene E. Domitrovich

  • Implementation Quality: Lessons Learned in the Context of the Head Start REDI Trial.

    Celene E. Domitrovich;Scott D. Gest;Damon Jones;Sukhdeep Gill

  • Effects of Head Start REDI on Children's Outcomes 1 Year Later in Different Kindergarten Contexts.

    Karen L. Bierman;Robert L. Nix;Brenda S. Heinrichs;Celene E. Domitrovich

  • Language Development Subcontexts in Head Start Classrooms: Distinctive Patterns of Teacher Talk During Free Play, Mealtime, and Book Reading

    Scott D. Gest;Rebecca Holland-Coviello;Janet A. Welsh;Deborah L. Eicher-Catt

  • Teacher Management of Elementary Classroom Social Dynamics Associations With Changes in Student Adjustment

    Scott D. Gest;Rebecca A. Madill;Kathleen M. Zadzora;Aaron M. Miller

  • A Reputation for Success (or Failure) : The Association of Peer Academic Reputations With Academic Self-Concept, Effort, and Performance Across the Upper Elementary Grades

    Scott D. Gest;Kelly L. Rulison;Alice J. Davidson;Janet A. Welsh

  • Shared Book Reading and Children's Language Comprehension Skills: The Moderating Role of Parental Discipline Practices.

    Scott D Gest;Nicole R Freeman;Celene E Domitrovich;Janet A Welsh

  • Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence

    James Moody;Wendy D. Brynildsen;D. Wayne Osgood;Mark E. Feinberg

Frequent Co-Authors

D. Wayne Osgood
D. Wayne Osgood Pennsylvania State University
Mark E. Feinberg
Mark E. Feinberg Pennsylvania State University
Karen L. Bierman
Karen L. Bierman Pennsylvania State University
James Moody
James Moody Duke University
Ann S. Masten
Ann S. Masten University of Minnesota
Auke Tellegen
Auke Tellegen University of Minnesota
Nilam Ram
Nilam Ram Stanford University
Jan Kornelis Dijkstra
Jan Kornelis Dijkstra University of Groningen
Robert B. Cairns
Robert B. Cairns University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mark T. Greenberg
Mark T. Greenberg Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA can open many doors to impactful careers, including becoming a marriage and family therapist (MFT). Many accredited universities offer flexible online programs, making it accessible for students nationwide to advance their professional journey.

Key factors to consider include state-specific licensing and education requirements. For example, Memphis mft education requirements highlight essential coursework and supervised clinical hours needed for aspiring therapists in Tennessee.

Similarly, students should be aware of local regulations, such as Mesa mft education requirements, which can differ from other states. Understanding Miami mft certification requirements is also crucial if you plan to work in Florida.

If you’re interested in practicing in the Midwest, review the steps on how to become an mft in Milwaukee. Comparing these requirements will help you choose the best online degree or licensure pathway for your career goals in psychology and therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Scott D. Gest

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles