World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan Kornelis Dijkstra

Jan Kornelis Dijkstra

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
5923
World Ranking
8602
National Ranking
380

Jan Kornelis Dijkstra publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Kornelis Dijkstra sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 164 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jan Kornelis Dijkstra D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Kornelis Dijkstra sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Kornelis Dijkstra is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple disciplines within the social sciences and psychology fields with an emphasis on social dynamics, education, and behavioral development.

Their recent publications cover diverse topics connected to social interactions and developmental psychology. Selected papers include:

  • "Adolescents' engagement trajectories in multicultural classrooms: The role of the classroom context," 2020, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
  • "Multidimensional similarity in multiplex networks: friendships between same- and cross-gender bullies and same- and cross-gender victims," 2020, Network Science
  • "The relation between defending, (dis)liking, and the classroom bullying norm: A cross-sectional social network approach in late childhood," 2021, International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • "Sexual identity disparities in mental health among U.K. adults, U.S. adults, and U.S. adolescents: Examining heterogeneity by race/ethnicity," 2020, Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
  • "Dynamics and disruption: Structural and individual changes in two Dutch Jihadi networks after police interventions," 2022, Social Networks

Their work frequently appears in several publication venues, reflecting a focus on criminology, behavioral science, and applied psychology:

  • Tijdschrift voor Criminologie
  • CrimRxiv
  • Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
  • International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • Social Networks

Dijkstra's collaborations include several frequent coauthors with whom multiple papers have been published. These include René Veenstra, Tomáš Diviák, Gijs Huitsing, Andreas Flache, and Casper S. van Nassau.

Their research fields predominantly fall within social sciences and psychology. Further classification indicates expertise in subfields such as sociology and political science, social psychology, education, communication, and clinical psychology.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Parental Involvement in Education
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Best Publications

  • Beyond the Class Norm: Bullying Behavior of Popular Adolescents and its Relation to Peer Acceptance and Rejection

    Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Siegwart Lindenberg;René Veenstra

  • Network–Behavior Dynamics

    René Veenstra;Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Christian Steglich;Maarten H. W. Van Zalk

  • The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences

    René Veenstra;Siegwart Lindenberg;Anke Munniksma;Jan Kornelis Dijkstra

  • Basking in Reflected Glory and Its Limits: Why Adolescents Hang Out With Popular Peers

    Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Siegwart M. Lindenberg;D. René Veenstra

  • THE INVOLVEMENT OF PARENCHYMAL, KUPFFER AND ENDOTHELIAL LIVER-CELLS IN THE HEPATIC-UPTAKE OF INTRAVENOUSLY INJECTED LIPOSOMES - EFFECTS OF LANTHANUM AND GADOLINIUM SALTS

    Frits Roerdink;Jan Dijkstra;Ger Hartman;Ben Bolscher

  • Popularity and Adolescent Friendship Networks: Selection and Influence Dynamics

    Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Casey Borch

  • INFLUENCE AND SELECTION PROCESSES IN WEAPON CARRYING DURING ADOLESCENCE: THE ROLES OF STATUS, AGGRESSION, AND VULNERABILITY*

    Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Siegwart Lindenberg;René Veenstra;Christian E. G. Steglich

  • Transformations in adolescent peer networks

    R. Veenstra;J.K. Dijkstra

  • The relation between popularity and aggressive, destructive, and norm-breaking behaviors: Moderating effects of athletic abilities, physical attractiveness, and prosociality

    Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Siegwart Lindenberg;Frank C. Verhulst;Johan Ormel

  • Peer Norm Salience for Academic Achievement, Prosocial Behavior, and Bullying Implications for Adolescent School Experiences

    Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Scott D. Gest

  • Same-gender and cross-gender peer acceptance and peer rejection and their relation to bullying and helping among preadolescents: comparing predictions from gender-homophily and goal-framing approaches.

    Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Siegwart Lindenberg;René Veenstra

  • The dynamics of friendships and victimization in adolescence: a longitudinal social network perspective.

    Miranda Sentse;Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Christina Salmivalli;Christina Salmivalli;Antonius H. N. Cillessen

  • Do physical and relational aggression explain adolescents' friendship selection? The competing roles of network characteristics, gender, and social status.

    Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Christian Berger;Siegwart Lindenberg

  • First selection, then influence: Developmental differences in friendship dynamics regarding academic achievement

    Mariola Claudia Gremmen;Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Christian Steglich;René Veenstra

  • The development of adolescents' friendships and antipathies: A longitudinal multivariate network test of balance theory

    J. Ashwin Rambaran;Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Anke Munniksma;Antonius H.N. Cillessen

  • Predicting life-time and regular cannabis use during adolescence; the roles of temperament and peer substance use: the TRAILS study.

    Hanneke E. Creemers;Jan K. Dijkstra;Wilma A. M. Vollebergh;Johan Ormel

  • Being Admired or Being Liked: Classroom Social Status and Depressive Problems in Early Adolescent Girls and Boys.

    Albertine J. Oldehinkel;Albertine J. Oldehinkel;Judith G. M. Rosmalen;René Veenstra;Jan Kornelis Dijkstra

  • Competition, Envy, or Snobbism? How Popularity and Friendships Shape Antipathy Networks of Adolescents

    Christian Berger;Jan Kornelis Dijkstra

  • Who helps whom? Investigating the development of adolescent prosocial relationships.

    Louise van Rijsewijk;Jan Kornelis Dijkstra;Kim Pattiselanno;Christian Steglich

  • Influence of liposome charge on the association of liposomes with Kupffer cells in vitro. Effects of divalent cations and competition with latex particles.

    Jan Dijkstra;Mieke van Galen;Gerrit Scherphof

Frequent Co-Authors

René Veenstra
René Veenstra University of Groningen
Christian Steglich
Christian Steglich University of Groningen
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh Utrecht University
Siegwart Lindenberg
Siegwart Lindenberg University of Groningen
Gerrit L. Scherphof
Gerrit L. Scherphof University of Groningen
Antonius H. N. Cillessen
Antonius H. N. Cillessen Radboud University
Tom A. B. Snijders
Tom A. B. Snijders University of Groningen
Albertine J. Oldehinkel
Albertine J. Oldehinkel University Medical Center Groningen
Andreas Flache
Andreas Flache University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology in the USA can open doors to diverse and rewarding career pathways, many of which align with the fields of counseling, research, and healthcare. One popular related career is speech-language pathology, a profession dedicated to helping people with communication and swallowing disorders.

If you are curious about how to become a speech language pathologist in Minnesota, you will find specific education and licensure requirements that ensure professionals are well-qualified to deliver quality care. Likewise, slp requirements in Mississippi highlight the need for a master’s degree in speech-language pathology, supervised practice, and a passing score on relevant exams.

For those interested in practicing in Missouri, the Missouri speech pathologist certification requirements provide a state-specific look at training, examination, and continuing education. Meanwhile, individuals considering career opportunities in Montana should review the detailed Montana speech pathologist certification requirements before starting their journey.

Whether you choose to study psychology or pursue a related online degree like speech-language pathology, each pathway offers a fulfilling way to make a difference in people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Kornelis Dijkstra

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles