World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 88 1034 907 58 53 370 29202

Albertine J. Oldehinkel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Albertine J. Oldehinkel between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Albertine J. Oldehinkel published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2017. 23 of the 466 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2017. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 37 publications 2016: 35 publications 2017: 46 publications 2018: 40 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 10 publications
1992 2025

466 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Albertine J. Oldehinkel: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 3
1994 0
1995 2
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 3
2000 2
2001 6
2002 0
2003 5
2004 6
2005 11
2006 5
2007 11
2008 13
2009 15
2010 11
2011 20
2012 19
2013 17
2014 19
2015 37
2016 35
2017 46
2018 40
2019 24
2020 18
2021 34
2022 17
2023 19
2024 13
2025 10
Total 466
Download as CSV

Albertine J. Oldehinkel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albertine J. Oldehinkel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–370 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 370 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71 370
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Albertine J. Oldehinkel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albertine J. Oldehinkel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83 88
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Albertine J. Oldehinkel is affiliated with the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research predominantly focuses on psychology, with substantive contributions to clinical psychology and experimental and cognitive psychology. Additional areas include genetics, public health, environmental and occupational health, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Albertine J. Oldehinkel has contributed to several peer-reviewed papers. Notable publications include:

  • Sleep characteristics across the lifespan in 1.1 million people from the Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • Novel loci for childhood body mass index and shared heritability with adult cardiometabolic traits (2020) published in PLoS Genetics
  • Genome-wide analysis in over 1 million individuals of European ancestry yields improved polygenic risk scores for blood pressure traits (2024) published in Nature Genetics
  • Intergenerational transmission: Theoretical and methodological issues and an introduction to four Dutch cohorts (2020) published in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychosocial and biological risk factors of anxiety disorders in adolescents: a TRAILS report (2020) published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

The venues where the scientist frequently publishes include:

  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Psychological Medicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Throughout their career, Albertine J. Oldehinkel has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, among them:

  • Catharina A. Hartman
  • Ilja M. Nolte
  • Dorret I. Boomsma
  • Brenda W.J.H. Penninx
  • Harold Snieder

Best Publications

  • Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology

    Adam E. Locke;Bratati Kahali;Sonja I. Berndt;Anne E. Justice

  • Novel genetic associations for blood pressure identified via gene-alcohol interaction in up to 570K individuals across multiple ancestries

    Mary F. Feitosa;Aldi T. Kraja;Daniel I. Chasman;Yun J. Sung

  • Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses

    Aysu Okbay;Bart M L Baselmans;Jan-Emmanuel De Neve;Patrick Turley

  • Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: a comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents.

    René Veenstra;Siegwart Lindenberg;Albertine J. Oldehinkel;Andrea F. de Winter

  • Neuroticism and common mental disorders : Meaning and utility of a complex relationship

    Johan Ormel;Bertus F Jeronimus;Roman Kotov;Harriëtte Riese

  • The Influence of Age and Sex on Genetic Associations with Adult Body Size and Shape: A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Interaction Study

    Thomas W. Winkler;Anne E. Justice;Mariaelisa Graff;Llilda Barata

  • Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of anxiety disorders.

    T. Otowa;T. Otowa;K. Hek;M. Lee;E. M. Byrne;E. M. Byrne

  • Prevalence and severity of DSM‐5 eating disorders in a community cohort of adolescents

    Frederique R. E. Smink;Daphne van Hoeken;Albertine J. Oldehinkel;Hans W. Hoek

  • Evaluation of non-response bias in mental health determinants and outcomes in a large sample of pre-adolescents

    Andrea F de Winter;Albertine J Oldehinkel;Albertine J Oldehinkel;René Veenstra;J Agnes Brunnekreef

  • Temperament profiles associated with internalizing and externalizing problems in preadolescence

    Albertine J. Oldehinkel;Catharina A. Hartman;Andrea F. de Winter;René Veenstra

  • GWAS of lifetime cannabis use reveals new risk loci, genetic overlap with psychiatric traits, and a causal influence of schizophrenia

    Joëlle A. Pasman;Karin J. H. Verweij;Karin J. H. Verweij;Zachary Gerring;Sven Stringer

  • Genome Analyses of >200,000 Individuals Identify 58 Loci for Chronic Inflammation and Highlight Pathways that Link Inflammation and Complex Disorders.

    S Ligthart;A Vaez;U Võsa;M G Stathopoulou

  • The interplay and etiological continuity of neuroticism, difficulties, and life events in the etiology of major and subsyndromal, first and recurrent depressive episodes in later life.

    Johan Ormel;Albertine J. Oldehinkel;Els I. Brilman

  • Sleep characteristics across the lifespan in 1.1 million people from the Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Desana Kocevska;Thom S Lysen;Aafje Dotinga;M Elisabeth Koopman-Verhoeff

  • Cohort profile: The Dutch 'TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives' survey'; TRAILS

    Martijn Huisman;Albertine J. Oldehinkel;Andrea de Winter;Ruud B. Minderaa

  • Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression

    R. C. Culverhouse;N. L. Saccone;A. C. Horton;Y. Ma

  • Vulnerability Before, During, and After a Major Depressive Episode: A 3-Wave Population-Based Study

    Johan Ormel;Albertine J. Oldehinkel;Wilma Vollebergh

  • Mental health in Dutch adolescents : A TRAILS report on prevalence, severity, age of onset, continuity and co-morbidity of DSM disorders

    J. Ormel;D. Raven;F. van Oort;C. A. Hartman

  • Genome-wide physical activity interactions in adiposity. A meta-analysis of 200,452 adults

    Mariaelisa Graff;Robert A. Scott;Anne E. Justice;Kristin L. Young

  • Adolescents' cortisol responses to awakening and social stress; effects of gender, menstrual phase and oral contraceptives. The TRAILS study.

    Esther M. C. Bouma;Harriette Riese;Johan Ormel;Frank C. Verhulst

  • Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses

    Aysu Okbay;Bart M. L. Baselmans;Jan-Emmanuel De Neve;Patrick Turley

Frequent Co-Authors

Johan Ormel
Johan Ormel University Medical Center Groningen
Catharina A. Hartman
Catharina A. Hartman University Medical Center Groningen
Ilja M. Nolte
Ilja M. Nolte University Medical Center Groningen
Harold Snieder
Harold Snieder University Medical Center Groningen
Olli T. Raitakari
Olli T. Raitakari Turku University Hospital
Tonu Esko
Tonu Esko University of Tartu
Dorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Daniel I. Chasman
Daniel I. Chasman Brigham and Women's Hospital
André G. Uitterlinden
André G. Uitterlinden Erasmus University Rotterdam
Terho Lehtimäki
Terho Lehtimäki Tampere University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up many flexible options for aspiring students. These programs are designed for those balancing work, family, or other commitments and make higher education more accessible. With the growing availability of online options, choosing a program that fits your budget and career goals is crucial.

Affordability is often a primary concern. Students can compare affordable psychology programs in Texas, look into the most affordable psychology degree programs in University Park, or research the cheapest psychology degrees in Utah to find options that suit their financial situation. There are also affordable psychology degrees in Vermont that ensure quality without a high price tag.

Graduates can pursue diverse pathways, from clinical and counseling psychology to roles in education, research, or human resources. Online degrees offer entry into these expanding fields, helping students launch or advance meaningful, impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Albertine J. Oldehinkel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles