World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
35283
World Ranking
12990
National Ranking
531

David W. Hedley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Hedley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 396 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David W. Hedley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Hedley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David W. Hedley is affiliated with the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular emphasis on Oncology, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Surgery, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Imaging.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Cancer Research and Treatments
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research

The scientist has published frequently in the following venues:

  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Science Advances
  • Cytotherapy

Recent papers authored or coauthored by David W. Hedley include:

  • A phase II trial of GSK2256098 and trametinib in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (2022), Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Patient-derived tumor xenograft and organoid models established from resected pancreatic, duodenal and biliary cancers (2021), Scientific Reports
  • Quantifying Reoxygenation in Pancreatic Cancer During Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (2020), Scientific Reports
  • NOX4 links metabolic regulation in pancreatic cancer to endoplasmic reticulum redox vulnerability and dependence on PRDX4 (2021), Science Advances
  • Pancreatic cancer growth promoted by bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell-derived IL-6 is reversed predominantly by IL-6 blockade (2022), Cytotherapy

Frequent collaborators include:

  • May Cheung
  • Anna Dvorkin-Gheva
  • Sajad Moshkelgosha
  • Tereza Martinu
  • Bradly G. Wouters

Best Publications

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry

    D W Hedley;M L Friedlander;I W Taylor;C A Rugg

  • Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies

    Andrea Cossarizza;Hyun Dong Chang;Andreas Radbruch;Mübeccel Akdis

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition)

    Andrea Cossarizza;Hyun Dong Chang;Andreas Radbruch;Andreas Acs

  • Guidelines for implementation of clinical DNA cytometry

    T V Shankey;P S Rabinovitch;B Bagwell;K D Bauer

  • The distribution of the anticancer drug Doxorubicin in relation to blood vessels in solid tumors.

    Andrew J. Primeau;Augusto Rendon;David Hedley;Lothar Lilge

  • Clinical and biological significance of aneuploidy in human tumours.

    M L Friedlander;D W Hedley;I W Taylor

  • Tumor Hypoxia Has Independent Predictor Impact Only in Patients With Node-Negative Cervix Cancer

    A. Fyles;M. Milosevic;D. Hedley;M. Pintilie

  • Application of DNA flow cytometry to paraffin‐embedded archival material for the study of aneuploidy and its clinical significance

    David W. Hedley;Michael L. Friedlander;Ian W. Taylor

  • Genomics-Driven Precision Medicine for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Early Results from the COMPASS Trial

    Kyaw Lwin Aung;Sandra E Fischer;Sandra E Fischer;Robert E Denroche;Gun-Ho Jang

  • Guidelines for the implementation of clinical DNA cytometry

    T. Vincent Shankey;Peter S. Rabinovitch;Bruce Bagwell;Kenneth D. Bauer

  • Overall survival and clinical characteristics of pancreatic cancer in BRCA mutation carriers.

    T D Golan;Zaheer S Kanji;Ron Epelbaum;N Devaud;N Devaud

  • Inhibition of phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase enhances gemcitabine-induced apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cells.

    Sylvia S. W. Ng;Ming-Sound Tsao;Sue Chow;David W. Hedley

  • Germline BRCA Mutations in a Large Clinic-Based Cohort of Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

    Spring Holter;Ayelet Borgida;Anna Dodd;Robert Grant

  • Down-Regulation of Rad51 and Decreased Homologous Recombination in Hypoxic Cancer Cells

    Ranjit S. Bindra;Paul J. Schaffer;Alice Meng;Jennifer Woo

  • Influence of cellular DNA content on survival in advanced ovarian cancer.

    Michael L. Friedlander;David W. Hedley;Ian W. Taylor;Peter Russell

  • Combining Gemcitabine and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Biliary Cancer: A Phase II Trial

    Jennifer J. Knox;David Hedley;Amit Oza;Ron Feld

  • Flow cytometry using paraffin-embedded tissue: five years on

    David W. Hedley

  • A phase II clinical and pharmacodynamic study of temsirolimus in advanced neuroendocrine carcinomas.

    Duran I;Kortmansky J;Singh D;Hirte H

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard P. Hill
Richard P. Hill Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Ming-Sound Tsao
Ming-Sound Tsao Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Malcolm J. Moore
Malcolm J. Moore Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Melania Pintilie
Melania Pintilie Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Michael Milosevic
Michael Milosevic Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Anthony Fyles
Anthony Fyles Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Aaron D. Schimmer
Aaron D. Schimmer Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Amit M. Oza
Amit M. Oza Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Mark D. Minden
Mark D. Minden Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Bradly G. Wouters
Bradly G. Wouters Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and complementary career paths is crucial for anyone interested in Medicine in the USA. Many students and working professionals seek flexible, affordable options to advance their qualifications or make a career switch—especially in nursing.

For those considering advanced nursing roles, a phd in nursing can open doors to leadership, research, and academic opportunities. If you are already an RN and want to boost your credentials, the most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs provide a flexible, cost-effective route to a bachelor’s degree.

Non-nurses looking for a direct entry into advanced practice can consider direct msn programs online, designed for students with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree. For those starting out, online adn programs offer an accessible entry point to the nursing profession.

These varied pathways provide opportunities for different backgrounds, aspirations, and life circumstances—helping you progress within the vast field of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing David W. Hedley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles