World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
45549
World Ranking
6210
National Ranking
3311

Peter S. Rabinovitch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter S. Rabinovitch sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 408 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter S. Rabinovitch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter S. Rabinovitch sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Peter S. Rabinovitch is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to Medicine. Within these areas, the scientist has focused on several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Physiology, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Aging.

They have published extensively on topics such as:

  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • ATP Synthase and ATPases Research
  • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Mitochondrial protein interaction landscape of SS-31", 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Late-life restoration of mitochondrial function reverses cardiac dysfunction in old mice", 2020, eLife
  • "Reduction of elevated proton leak rejuvenates mitochondria in the aged cardiomyocyte", 2020, eLife
  • "Lifespan benefits for the combination of rapamycin plus acarbose and for captopril in genetically heterogeneous mice", 2022, Aging Cell
  • "The multi-tissue landscape of somatic mtDNA mutations indicates tissue-specific accumulation and removal in aging", 2023, eLife

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), GeroScience, eLife, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, and Aging Cell.

Collaborative efforts are reflected in frequent co-authorship with:

  • David J. Marcinek
  • Jeremy Whitson
  • Mariya T. Sweetwyne
  • Matthew D. Campbell
  • Huiliang Zhang

Recognition of their professional standing includes election as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2015.

Best Publications

  • mTOR is a key modulator of ageing and age-related disease

    Simon C. Johnson;Peter S. Rabinovitch;Matt Kaeberlein;Matt Kaeberlein

  • Mitochondrial H2O2 emission and cellular redox state link excess fat intake to insulin resistance in both rodents and humans

    Ethan J. Anderson;Mary E. Lustig;Kristen E. Boyle;Tracey L. Woodlief

  • The oxygen-rich postnatal environment induces cardiomyocyte cell-cycle arrest through DNA damage response.

    Bao N. Puente;Wataru Kimura;Shalini A. Muralidhar;Jesung Moon

  • Current protocols in cytometry

    J. Paul Robinson;Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz;Robert Hoffman;John P. Nolan

  • Genetic clonal diversity predicts progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma

    Carlo C. Maley;Patricia C. Galipeau;Jennifer C. Finley;V. Jon Wongsurawat

  • Predictors of progression to cancer in Barrett's esophagus: baseline histology and flow cytometry identify low- and high-risk patient subsets.

    Brian J. Reid;Douglas S. Levine;Gary Longton;Patricia L. Blount;Patricia L. Blount

  • An endoscopic biopsy protocol can differentiate high-grade dysplasia from early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus

    Douglas S. Levine;Rodger C. Haggitt;Rodger C. Haggitt;Patricia L. Blount;Patricia L. Blount;Peter S. Rabinovitch;Peter S. Rabinovitch

  • DNA aneuploidy in colonic biopsies predicts future development of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis.

    Cyrus E. Rubin;Rodger C. Haggitt;Rodger C. Haggitt;Rodger C. Haggitt;Glenna C. Burmer;Glenna C. Burmer;Glenna C. Burmer;Teresa A. Brentnall;Teresa A. Brentnall;Teresa A. Brentnall

  • Guidelines for implementation of clinical DNA cytometry

    T V Shankey;P S Rabinovitch;B Bagwell;K D Bauer

  • Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress Mediates Angiotensin II–Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy and Gαq Overexpression–Induced Heart Failure

    Dao Fu Dai;Simon C. Johnson;Jason J. Villarin;Michael T. Chin

  • Flow-cytometric and histological progression to malignancy in Barrett's esophagus: Prospective endoscopic surveillance of a cohort

    Brian J. Reid;Patricia L. Blount;Cyrus E. Rubin;Douglas S. Levine

  • Overexpression of Catalase Targeted to Mitochondria Attenuates Murine Cardiac Aging

    Dao Fu Dai;Luis Fernando Santana;Marc Vermulst;Daniela M. Tomazela

  • Evolution of neoplastic cell lineages in Barrett oesophagus

    Michael T. Barrett;Carissa A. Sanchez;Laura J. Prevo;David J. Wong

  • mTOR Inhibition Alleviates Mitochondrial Disease in a Mouse Model of Leigh Syndrome

    Simon C. Johnson;Melana E. Yanos;Ernst Bernhard Kayser;Albert Quintana

  • Guidelines for the implementation of clinical DNA cytometry

    T. Vincent Shankey;Peter S. Rabinovitch;Bruce Bagwell;Kenneth D. Bauer

  • Mutations in the p53 gene: An early marker of neoplastic progression in ulcerative colitis

    Teresa A. Brentnall;David A. Crispin;Peter S. Rabinovitch;Rodger C. Haggitt

  • Heterogeneity among T cells in intracellular free calcium responses after mitogen stimulation with PHA or anti-CD3. Simultaneous use of indo-1 and immunofluorescence with flow cytometry.

    P S Rabinovitch;C H June;A Grossmann;J A Ledbetter

  • Mitochondrial oxidative stress in aging and healthspan.

    Dao-Fu Dai;Ying Ann Chiao;David J Marcinek;Hazel H Szeto

  • Mitochondrial point mutations do not limit the natural lifespan of mice

    Marc Vermulst;Jason H Bielas;Gregory C Kujoth;Warren C Ladiges

  • DNA deletions and clonal mutations drive premature aging in mitochondrial mutator mice.

    Marc Vermulst;Jonathan Wanagat;Gregory C Kujoth;Jason H Bielas

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian J. Reid
Brian J. Reid Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Mary P. Bronner
Mary P. Bronner University of Utah
George M. Martin
George M. Martin University of Washington
Martin Poot
Martin Poot University of Würzburg
Hazel H. Szeto
Hazel H. Szeto Cornell University
Michael J. MacCoss
Michael J. MacCoss University of Washington
Terrance J. Kavanagh
Terrance J. Kavanagh University of Washington
Matt Kaeberlein
Matt Kaeberlein University of Washington
Carl H. June
Carl H. June University of Pennsylvania
Robert D. Odze
Robert D. Odze Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in medicine but looking for flexible study options or alternative pathways, several accredited online programs are available. For those interested in administrative roles, earning a health care administration degree online can open doors to leadership opportunities in hospitals and clinics.

If direct patient care isn’t your focus, medical billing and coding online schools provide a streamlined route into the healthcare industry by training you in crucial back-office roles—often with options for financial aid.

Aspiring nurses may be concerned about admissions exams. However, do all nursing schools require the teas? The answer is no; some reputable programs accept students without TEAS or HESI testing, making the process more accessible.

If you’re already an RN with an associate degree, there are adn to fnp bridge programs that help you advance your qualifications and become a Family Nurse Practitioner, often with online study options.

Best Scientists Citing Peter S. Rabinovitch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles