World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
11703
World Ranking
6842
National Ranking
3711

Mark J. Martinko publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Martinko sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark J. Martinko D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Martinko sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark J. Martinko is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States. The primary focus of their research spans several areas within psychology and social sciences.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these broader fields, their work delves into subfields such as:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Key topics addressed in their research include:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Mark J. Martinko's recent scholarly output features the following paper:

  • The Relationship Between Follower Affect for President Trump and the Adoption of COVID-19 Personal Protective Behaviors, published in 2021 in the Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies

Their publications have appeared primarily in the Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies.

Collaborative work includes frequent co-authors such as:

  • Sherry E. Moss
  • Stacey R. Kessler
  • Jeremy D. Mackey

Best Publications

  • Impression Management in Organizations

    William L. Gardner;Mark J. Martinko

  • A review of abusive supervision research

    Mark J. Martinko;Paul Harvey;Jeremy R. Brees;Jeremy Mackey

  • Exploring the role of individual differences in the prediction of workplace aggression.

    Scott C. Douglas;Mark J. Martinko

  • Toward an Integrative Theory of Counterproductive Workplace Behavior: A Causal Reasoning Perspective

    Mark J. Martinko;Michael J. Gundlach;Scott C. Douglas

  • Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to Study Managers: A Literature Review and Research Agenda:

    William L. Gardner;Mark J. Martinko

  • Learned Helplessness: An Alternative Explanation for Performance Deficits

    Mark J. Martinko;William L. Gardner

  • The role, function, and contribution of attribution theory to leadership: A review

    Mark J. Martinko;Paul Harvey;Scott C. Douglas

  • The Leader/Member Attribution Process

    Mark J. Martinko;William L. Gardner

  • The Decision to Blow the Whistle: A Social Information Processing Framework

    Michael J. Gundlach;Scott C. Douglas;Mark J. Martinko

  • An empirical examination of the role of attributions in psychological entitlement and its outcomes

    Paul Harvey;Mark J. Martinko

  • Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: A case of unrealized potential

    Mark J. Martinko;Paul Harvey;Marie T. Dasborough

  • Attribution Theory in the Organizational Sciences: The Road Traveled and the Path Ahead

    Paul Harvey;Kristen Madison;Mark Martinko;T. Russell Crook

  • An attributional explanation of individual resistance to the introduction of information technologies in the workplace

    Mark J. Martinko;Robert W. Zmud;John W. Henry

  • Promoting Authentic Behavior in Organizations: An Attributional Perspective:

    Paul Harvey;Mark J. Martinko;William L. Gardner

  • Perceptions of abusive supervision: The role of subordinates' attribution styles☆

    Mark J. Martinko;Paul Harvey;David Sikora;Scott C. Douglas

  • Cognitions, emotions, and evaluations: An elaboration likelihood model for workplace aggression.

    Scott C. Douglas;Christian Kiewitz;Mark J. Martinko;Paul Harvey

  • Overt anger in response to victimization: attributional style and organizational norms as moderators.

    Karl Aquino;Scott Douglas;Mark J. Martinko

  • Attribution Theory: An Organizational Perspective

    Mark J. Martinko

  • Abusive supervision and the entitled employee

    Paul Harvey;Kenneth J. Harris;William E. Gillis;Mark J. Martinko

  • STRUCTURED OBSERVATION OF MANAGERIAL WORK: A REPLICATION AND SYNTHESIS*

    Mark J. Martinko;William L. Gardner

Frequent Co-Authors

William L. Gardner
William L. Gardner Texas Tech University
Neal M. Ashkanasy
Neal M. Ashkanasy University of Queensland
Kenneth J. Harris
Kenneth J. Harris Indiana University
Karl Aquino
Karl Aquino University of British Columbia
Robert G. Lord
Robert G. Lord Durham University
Gerald R. Ferris
Gerald R. Ferris Florida State University
Bennett J. Tepper
Bennett J. Tepper The Ohio State University
Simon Lloyd D. Restubog
Simon Lloyd D. Restubog University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
T. Russell Crook
T. Russell Crook Louisiana State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree programs and career pathways, especially in fields like social work and mental health services. Online degrees provide flexibility for working professionals or those unable to attend campus full-time, making higher education accessible from anywhere.

Social work is a popular avenue for psychology graduates, with programs offered in regions across the country. Students interested in city-specific opportunities can explore the top social work programs in Memphis or the best social work degrees in Miami. These programs often emphasize hands-on fieldwork and local community engagement.

For those seeking options in broader regions, the top social work degrees in the Midwest provide access to strong academic networks and internship opportunities. Students interested in northern states might consider the best social work degrees in Minnesota, known for innovative curriculums and diverse career outcomes.

Ultimately, a background in psychology or social work can lead to careers in counseling, mental health advocacy, case management, research, and policy. Online degree programs allow learners to customize their education to match their interests, paving the way for meaningful careers in helping professions.

Best Scientists Citing Mark J. Martinko

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles