World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 56 2207 1987 54 51 161 10935

Paul Gregorevic publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Gregorevic between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Gregorevic published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2023. 18 of the 242 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2023. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 8 publications
1997 2025

242 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Gregorevic: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 2
2000 3
2001 7
2002 5
2003 3
2004 12
2005 6
2006 5
2007 8
2008 4
2009 7
2010 3
2011 5
2012 8
2013 8
2014 10
2015 13
2016 15
2017 12
2018 13
2019 7
2020 6
2021 20
2022 8
2023 33
2024 10
2025 8
Total 242
Download as CSV

Paul Gregorevic publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Gregorevic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 157–166 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 161 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159 161
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul Gregorevic D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Gregorevic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113 56
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul Gregorevic is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research spans multiple disciplines within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. The scientist has contributed extensively to both main and subfields, focusing particularly on molecular biology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, physiology, genetics, and surgery.

Their work covers key topics including muscle physiology and disorders, adipose tissue and metabolism, ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, nutrition and health in aging, RNA research and splicing, RNA modifications and cancer, as well as pancreatic function and diabetes.

Paul Gregorevic has published in a variety of scientific venues, frequently contributing to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • Nature Communications

The scientist has collaborated regularly with several coauthors, including:

  • Hongwei Qian
  • Kevin I. Watt
  • Craig A. Goodman
  • Helen Kiriazis
  • Benjamin L. Parker

Notable recent publications include:

  • "Perturbed BMP signaling and denervation promote muscle wasting in cancer cachexia," 2021, published in Science Translational Medicine
  • "Phosphoproteomics of three exercise modalities identifies canonical signaling and C18ORF25 as an AMPK substrate regulating skeletal muscle function," 2022, published in Cell Metabolism
  • "Fine-tuning the cardiac O-GlcNAcylation regulatory enzymes governs the functional and structural phenotype of the diabetic heart," 2021, published in Cardiovascular Research
  • "Sex-Specific Control of Human Heart Maturation by the Progesterone Receptor," 2021, published in Circulation
  • "Integrated Glycoproteomics Identifies a Role of N-Glycosylation and Galectin-1 on Myogenesis and Muscle Development," 2020, published in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Best Publications

  • Systemic delivery of genes to striated muscles using adeno-associated viral vectors.

    Paul Gregorevic;Michael J Blankinship;James M Allen;Robert W Crawford

  • Suppression of microRNA-29 expression by TGF-β1 promotes collagen expression and renal fibrosis.

    Bo Wang;Radko Komers;Rosemarie Carew;Catherine E. Winbanks

  • Extracellular Vesicles Provide a Means for Tissue Crosstalk during Exercise

    Martin Whitham;Martin Whitham;Benjamin L. Parker;Martin Friedrichsen;Janne R. Hingst

  • Therapeutic inhibition of the miR-34 family attenuates pathological cardiac remodeling and improves heart function

    Bianca C Bernardo;Xiao Ming Gao;Catherine E Winbanks;Esther J H Boey

  • Functional screening in human cardiac organoids reveals a metabolic mechanism for cardiomyocyte cell cycle arrest

    Richard J. Mills;Drew M. Titmarsh;Xaver Koenig;Xaver Koenig;Benjamin L. Parker

  • rAAV6-microdystrophin preserves muscle function and extends lifespan in severely dystrophic mice.

    Paul Gregorevic;James M Allen;Elina Minami;Michael J Blankinship

  • Efficient transduction of skeletal muscle using vectors based on adeno-associated virus serotype 6.

    Michael J. Blankinship;Paul Gregorevic;James M. Allen;Scott Q. Harper

  • TGF-β Regulates miR-206 and miR-29 to Control Myogenic Differentiation through Regulation of HDAC4

    Catherine E. Winbanks;Bo Wang;Claudia Beyer;Phillip Koh

  • Sustained AAV-mediated dystrophin expression in a canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy with a brief course of immunosuppression

    Zejing Wang;Christian S Kuhr;Christian S Kuhr;James M Allen;Michael Blankinship

  • Design of tissue-specific regulatory cassettes for high-level rAAV-mediated expression in skeletal and cardiac muscle.

    Maja Z. Salva;Charis L. Himeda;Phillip W L Tai;Eiko Nishiuchi

  • miR-21 promotes renal fibrosis in diabetic nephropathy by targeting PTEN and SMAD7

    Aaron D McClelland;Aaron D McClelland;Michal Herman-Edelstein;Radko Komers;Jay Chandra Jha

  • Follistatin-mediated skeletal muscle hypertrophy is regulated by Smad3 and mTOR independently of myostatin

    Catherine E. Winbanks;Kate L. Weeks;Rachel E. Thomson;Patricio V. Sepulveda;Patricio V. Sepulveda

  • The bone morphogenetic protein axis is a positive regulator of skeletal muscle mass

    Catherine E Winbanks;Justin Chen;Justin Chen;Justin Chen;Hongwei Qian;Yingying Liu

  • TGFβ and BMP signaling in skeletal muscle: potential significance for muscle-related disease

    Roberta Sartori;Paul Gregorevic;Marco Sandri

  • Elevated expression of activins promotes muscle wasting and cachexia

    Justin L. Chen;Justin L. Chen;Kelly L. Walton;Catherine E. Winbanks;Kate T. Murphy

  • ACTN3 genotype influences muscle performance through the regulation of calcineurin signaling.

    Jane T. Seto;Kate G.R. Quinlan;Monkol Lek;Xi Fiona Zheng

  • Systemic Microdystrophin Gene Delivery Improves Skeletal Muscle Structure and Function in Old Dystrophic mdx Mice

    Paul Gregorevic;Michael J Blankinship;James M Allen;Jeffrey S Chamberlain

  • The Hippo pathway effector YAP is a critical regulator of skeletal muscle fibre size

    Kevin I. Watt;Bradley J. Turner;Adam Hagg;Xuehua Zhang

  • Systemic administration of micro-dystrophin restores cardiac geometry and prevents dobutamine-induced cardiac pump failure.

    De Wayne Townsend;Michael J. Blankinship;James M. Allen;Paul Gregorevic

  • Immunity to adeno-associated virus-mediated gene transfer in a random-bred canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

    Zejing Wang;James M Allen;Stanley R Riddell;Paul Gregorevic

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey S. Chamberlain
Jeffrey S. Chamberlain University of Washington
Craig A. Harrison
Craig A. Harrison Monash University
Mark A. Febbraio
Mark A. Febbraio Monash University
David A. Williams
David A. Williams Boston Children's Hospital
Kathryn N. North
Kathryn N. North University of Melbourne
Martin N. Sillence
Martin N. Sillence Queensland University of Technology
David E. James
David E. James University of Sydney
Kate L Loveland
Kate L Loveland Hudson Institute of Medical Research
Peter J. Meikle
Peter J. Meikle Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Stephen J. Tapscott
Stephen J. Tapscott Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in molecular biology often explore interdisciplinary careers that complement their science background. Online degree programs can open doors to new opportunities in growing fields, making advanced study more accessible and flexible.

For those drawn to understanding human behavior, consider pursuing an online masters in psychology. This path is ideal for individuals interested in cognitive science or applying biology in clinical settings.

If you’re passionate about supporting mental health, a master of mental health online can help you bridge the gap between biological science and counseling practice.

Molecular biology skills are also valuable in investigative roles. A forensic psychology masters programs can lead to careers in law enforcement or legal advocacy, where scientific methods and behavioral analysis intersect.

For those interested in development and behavior in younger populations, an online masters in child psychology may be a rewarding route, combining scientific inquiry with direct impact in schools and clinical settings.

Each of these degrees can broaden your career options and enhance your understanding of the dynamic relationship between biology and behavior.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Gregorevic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles