World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2764 2531 163 149 143 28052

Karl Aquino publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Karl Aquino between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Karl Aquino published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2022. 13 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2022. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
1989 2025

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Karl Aquino: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 4
2000 5
2001 2
2002 4
2003 4
2004 5
2005 2
2006 2
2007 6
2008 6
2009 8
2010 5
2011 7
2012 8
2013 12
2014 8
2015 4
2016 12
2017 4
2018 7
2019 3
2020 8
2021 6
2022 13
2023 7
2024 5
2025 8
Total 173
Download as CSV

Karl Aquino publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karl Aquino sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 143 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 143
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Karl Aquino D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karl Aquino sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Karl Aquino is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research spans various aspects of social sciences, focusing primarily on social and cognitive psychological themes. The main fields of study for Aquino's work include social sciences, with notable subfields covering sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, safety research, clinical psychology, and social psychology.

The scientist's work explores multiple interconnected topics, including psychology of moral and emotional judgment, social and intergroup psychology, ethics in business and education, experimental behavioral economics studies, personality traits and psychology, misinformation and its impacts, and behavioral health and interventions.

Frequent publication outlets for Aquino include Academy of Management Proceedings, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Journal of Applied Psychology, SSRN Electronic Journal, and PsycTESTS Dataset.

Among Aquino's recent papers are studies addressing diverse themes such as political behavior, personality psychology, and scientific censorship. These include:

  • Incivility Is Rising Among American Politicians on Twitter, 2022, Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Signaling virtuous victimhood as indicators of Dark Triad personalities, 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Man up and take it: Gender bias in moral typecasting, 2020, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Dual pathways to bias: Evaluators' ideology and ressentiment independently predict racial discrimination in hiring contexts, 2020, Journal of Applied Psychology

Aquino collaborates regularly with several researchers, with the most frequent coauthors including Maja Graso, Fan Xuan Chen, Ekin Ok, Simon Lloyd D. Restubog, and Brendan Strejcek.

Best Publications

  • The self-importance of moral identity.

    Karl Aquino;Americus Reed

  • Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies

    Mark Simon;Susan M. Houghton;Karl Aquino

  • Who Displays Ethical Leadership, and Why Does It Matter? An Examination of Antecedents and Consequences of Ethical Leadership

    David M. Mayer;Karl Aquino;Rebecca L. Greenbaum;Maribeth Kuenzi

  • Testing a Social-Cognitive Model of Moral Behavior: The Interactive Influence of Situations and Moral Identity Centrality

    Karl Aquino;Dilys Freeman;Americus Reed Ii;Vivien Lim

  • Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations.

    Karl Aquino;Thomas M. Tripp;Robert J. Bies

  • Workplace victimization: aggression from the target's perspective.

    Karl Aquino;Stefan Thau

  • Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: a proposed model and empirical test

    Karl Aquino;Karl Aquino;Margaret U. Lewis;Murray Bradfield

  • How employees respond to personal offense: the effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace

    Karl Aquino;Thomas M. Tripp;Robert J. Bies

  • Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups.

    Americus Reed Ii;Karl F. Aquino

  • Moral Identity and Judgments of Charitable Behaviors

    Americus Reed;Karl Aquino;Eric Levy

  • A Social Context Model of Envy and Social Undermining

    Michelle K. Duffy;Kristin L. Scott;Jason D. Shaw;Bennett J. Tepper

  • The Effects of Blame Attributions and Offender Likableness on Forgiveness and Revenge in the Workplace

    Murray Bradfield;Karl Aquino

  • Moral identity and the experience of moral elevation in response to acts of uncommon goodness.

    Karl Aquino;Brent McFerran;Marjorie Laven

  • Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status

    Karl Aquino;Scott Douglas

  • Beyond moral reasoning: A review of moral identity research and its implications for business ethics

    Ruodan Shao;Karl Aquino;Dan Freeman

  • The effects of negative affectivity, hierarchical status, and self-determination on workplace victimization

    Karl Aquino;Steven L. Grover;Murray Bradfield;David G. Allen

  • A grotesque and dark beauty: How moral identity and mechanisms of moral disengagement influence cognitive and emotional reactions to war

    Karl Aquino;Americus Reed;Stefan Thau;Dan Freeman

  • Integrating justice constructs into the turnover process : a test of a referent cognitions model

    Karl Aquino;Rodger W. Griffeth;David G. Allen;Peter W. Hom

  • A relational model of workplace victimization: social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships.

    Karl Aquino;Kai Lamertz

  • Structural and individual determinants of workplace victimization: The effects of hierarchical status and conflict management style.

    Karl Aquino

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Lloyd D. Restubog
Simon Lloyd D. Restubog University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
William H. Bommer
William H. Bommer California State University, Fresno
Daniel P. Skarlicki
Daniel P. Skarlicki University of British Columbia
Vivien K. G. Lim
Vivien K. G. Lim National University of Singapore
Vikas Mittal
Vikas Mittal Rice University
David G. Allen
David G. Allen Texas Christian University
Debra L. Shapiro
Debra L. Shapiro University of Maryland, College Park
Michelle Duffy
Michelle Duffy University of Newcastle Australia
Jessica L. Tracy
Jessica L. Tracy University of British Columbia
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens the door to a wide range of online degree options and flexible career pathways. Whether you aim to work as a mental health counselor, therapist, or in another supportive role, online psychology degrees can provide the foundational knowledge and credentials you need.

The education and licensing requirements to become a counselor may differ depending on where you plan to practice. For example, those who wish to learn how to become a mental health counselor in Chula Vista will need to follow state-specific guidelines. Similarly, if you want to become a mental health counselor in Cincinnati or understand mental health counselor requirements in Cleveland, it's important to research local education and licensing rules.

Advanced positions often require a master’s degree and supervised clinical experience. If you are interested in exploring pathways in Colorado, review the Colorado Springs mental health counselor education requirements to ensure you meet the state’s standards. No matter your location, choosing a reputable online program is key to unlocking new professional opportunities in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Karl Aquino

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles