World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7407 6908 16 15 96 11893

Vivien K. G. Lim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Vivien K. G. Lim between 1990 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Vivien K. G. Lim published across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2012. 7 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2012. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
1990 2026

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Vivien K. G. Lim: publications per year, 1990 to 2026
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 3
1997 4
1998 6
1999 4
2000 8
2001 5
2002 4
2003 6
2004 0
2005 2
2006 3
2007 0
2008 4
2009 2
2010 3
2011 5
2012 10
2013 6
2014 3
2015 1
2016 4
2017 3
2018 6
2019 4
2020 1
2021 2
2022 4
2023 4
2024 8
2025 6
2026 1
Total 124
Download as CSV

Vivien K. G. Lim publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vivien K. G. Lim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 96
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Vivien K. G. Lim D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vivien K. G. Lim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Vivien K. G. Lim is affiliated with the National University of Singapore in Singapore and conducts research primarily within the social sciences. Their scholarly output includes numerous publications focusing on workplace behavior, social psychology, and related domains.

The main fields of study for this researcher are:

  • Social Sciences

The subfields of their work encompass:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Demography
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Social Psychology
  • Safety Research

Key research topics addressed include:

  • Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
  • Taxation and Compliance Studies
  • Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Among recent notable papers authored or coauthored by Vivien K. G. Lim are:

  • "Cyberloafing: A review and research agenda," published in 2022 in Applied Psychology

Other influential papers relevant to their research area, though authored by frequent collaborators, include:

  • "Abusive supervision and cyberloafing: A moderated moderation model of moral disengagement and negative reciprocity beliefs," 2022, Information & Management
  • "10th Anniversary of the European Association for Predictive, Preventive and Personalised (3P) Medicine - EPMA World Congress Supplement 2020," 2020, The EPMA Journal
  • "Cyberloafing among Gen Z students: the role of norms, moral disengagement, multitasking self-efficacy, and psychological outcomes," 2022, European Journal of Psychology of Education
  • "Behavioral economics and monetary wisdom: A cross-level analysis of monetary aspiration, pay (dis)satisfaction, risk perception, and corruption in 32 nations," 2023, Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility

The frequent coauthors who collaborated with Vivien K. G. Lim include:

  • Thompson S.H. Teo
  • Ningyu Tang
  • Thomas Li-Ping Tang
  • Mehmet Ferhat Özbek
  • Mahfooz A. Ansari

Their research has appeared in multiple publication venues, including:

  • Applied Psychology
  • Information & Management
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The EPMA Journal

Best Publications

  • Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage

    Thompson S.H Teo;Vivien K.G Lim;Raye Y.C Lai

  • The IT way of loafing on the job: cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice

    Vivien K. G. Lim

  • Testing a Social-Cognitive Model of Moral Behavior: The Interactive Influence of Situations and Moral Identity Centrality

    Karl Aquino;Dilys Freeman;Americus Reed Ii;Vivien Lim

  • Job Insecurity and Its Outcomes: Moderating Effects of Work-Based and Nonwork-Based Social Support

    Vivien K. G. Lim

  • Prevalence, perceived seriousness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore an exploratory study

    Vivien K. G. Lim;Thompson S. H. Teo

  • Lost sleep and cyberloafing: Evidence from the laboratory and a daylight saving time quasi-experiment.

    David T. Wagner;Christopher M. Barnes;Vivien K. G. Lim;D. Lance Ferris

  • Strength in adversity: The influence of psychological capital on job search

    Don J. Q. Chen;Vivien K. G. Lim

  • Sex, money and financial hardship: An empirical study of attitudes towards money among undergraduates in Singapore

    Vivien K.G. Lim;Thompson S.H. Teo

  • Mind your E-manners: Impact of cyber incivility on employees' work attitude and behavior

    Vivien K. G. Lim;Thompson S. H. Teo

  • Examining the relationships among e-government maturity, corruption, economic prosperity and environmental degradation: A cross-country analysis

    Satish Krishnan;Thompson S. H. Teo;Vivien K. G. Lim

  • Gender differences in internet usage and task preferences

    Thompson S. H. Teo;Vivien K. G. Lim

  • How do I loaf here? let me count the ways

    Vivien K. G. Lim;Thompson S. H. Teo;Geok Leng Loo

  • Attitudes Toward, and Intentions to Report, Academic Cheating Among Students in Singapore

    Vivien K. G. Lim;Sean K. B. See

  • The dark triad and knowledge hiding

    Wei Pan;Qingpu Zhang;Thompson S.H. Teo;Vivien K.G. Lim

  • Moderating effects of work-based support on the relationship between job insecurity and its consequences.

    Vivien K. G. Lim

  • To work or not to work at home‐An empirical investigation of factors affecting attitudes towards teleworking

    Vivien K.G. Lim;Thompson S.H. Teo

  • An approach-avoidance framework of workplace aggression

    D. Lance Ferris;Ming Yan;Vivien K. G. Lim;Yuanyi Chen

  • The effects of perceived justice on satisfaction and behavioral intentions: the case of computer purchase

    Thompson S.H. Teo;Vivien K.G. Lim

  • The Love of Money and Pay Level Satisfaction: Measurement and Functional Equivalence in 29 Geopolitical Entities around the World

    Thomas Li Ping Tang;Toto Sutarso;Adebowale Akande;Michael W. Allen

  • Gender differences and attitudes towards homosexuality.

    Vivien K G Lim

  • RESEARCH REPORT Lost Sleep and Cyberloafing: Evidence From the Laboratory and a Daylight Saving Time Quasi-Experiment

    David T. Wagner;Christopher M. Barnes;Vivien K. G. Lim;D. Lance Ferris

Frequent Co-Authors

Thompson S. H. Teo
Thompson S. H. Teo National University of Singapore
Thomas Li-Ping Tang
Thomas Li-Ping Tang Middle Tennessee State University
D. Lance Ferris
D. Lance Ferris University of Ottawa
Karl Aquino
Karl Aquino University of British Columbia
Christopher M. Barnes
Christopher M. Barnes University of Washington
Debra L. Shapiro
Debra L. Shapiro University of Maryland, College Park
Daniel C. Feldman
Daniel C. Feldman University of Georgia
Pranjal H. Mehta
Pranjal H. Mehta University College London
Remus Ilies
Remus Ilies National University of Singapore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to a variety of impactful career pathways, including counseling, clinical practice, and organizational psychology. Online programs make it easier to achieve your academic goals, especially if you need a flexible schedule or live far from campus.

When selecting a program, consider accreditation, faculty expertise, and practical training opportunities. Location can also affect career prospects—some states offer more robust counseling careers than others. To help you compare your options, check out these rankings of the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Colorado, most valuable counseling programs in Florida, most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Los Angeles, and most valuable counseling programs in Missouri.

Students in online psychology and counseling degrees can pursue roles as licensed counselors, school psychologists, or mental health specialists. Many positions require state licensure, so be sure to select programs that meet local requirements. Take time to explore these valuable options as you start your educational journey.

Best Scientists Citing Vivien K. G. Lim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles