World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
D. Lance Ferris

D. Lance Ferris

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10014 9375 695 651 84 10584

D. Lance Ferris publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by D. Lance Ferris between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. D. Lance Ferris published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2012. 4 of the 96 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2012. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
2005 2025

96 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
D. Lance Ferris: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 2
2007 3
2008 5
2009 5
2010 1
2011 5
2012 12
2013 6
2014 10
2015 4
2016 7
2017 10
2018 5
2019 4
2020 3
2021 2
2022 2
2023 4
2024 3
2025 1
Total 96
Download as CSV

D. Lance Ferris publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where D. Lance Ferris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 84
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

D. Lance Ferris D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where D. Lance Ferris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

D. Lance Ferris is affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada and contributes to research primarily in the areas of organizational behavior, social psychology, and applied psychology. Their work focuses on themes such as job satisfaction, ethics in business and education, social and intergroup psychology, behavioral health and interventions, death anxiety and social exclusion, attachment and relationship dynamics, and management theory and practice.

The scientist has numerous publications in peer-reviewed journals, with a notable presence in the Journal of Applied Psychology. Other publication venues include the Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Group & Organization Management, Human Performance, and the Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Ferris include the following:

  • The PCMT model of organizational support: An integrative review and reconciliation of the organizational support literature. (2021, Journal of Applied Psychology)
  • Can two wrongs make a right? The buffering effect of retaliation on subordinate well-being following abusive supervision. (2021, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology)
  • Does Value Similarity Matter? Influence of Ethical Leadership on Employee Engagement and Deviance. (2022, Group & Organization Management)
  • License to Retaliate: Good Deeds as a Moral License for Misdeeds in Reaction to Abusive Supervision. (2022, Human Performance)
  • My manager endorsed my coworkers' voice: Understanding observers' positive and negative reactions to managerial endorsement of coworker voice. (2024, Journal of Applied Psychology)

Frequent co-authors of Ferris include:

  • Russell E. Johnson
  • E. C. Poulton
  • James Garrett Matusik
  • Shereen Fatimah
  • Hun Whee Lee

Ferris's research spans several subfields of study, including organizational behavior and human resource management, social psychology, information systems and management, sociology and political science, and applied psychology.

The scientist's main topics of work cover:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Management Theory and Practice

Best Publications

  • A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work

    Anja Van den Broeck;Anja Van den Broeck;D. Lance Ferris;Chu Hsiang Chang;Christopher C. Rosen

  • The Development and Validation of the Workplace Ostracism Scale

    D. Lance Ferris;Douglas J. Brown;Joseph W. Berry;Huiwen Lian

  • Core Self-Evaluations: A Review and Evaluation of the Literature

    Chu Hsiang Chang;D. Lance Ferris;Russell E. Johnson;Christopher C. Rosen

  • Does Power Distance Exacerbate or Mitigate the Effects of Abusive Supervision? It Depends on the Outcome

    Huiwen Lian;D. Lance Ferris;Douglas J. Brown

  • Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance

    Huiwen Lian;D. Lance Ferris;Douglas J. Brown

  • Lost sleep and cyberloafing: Evidence from the laboratory and a daylight saving time quasi-experiment.

    David T. Wagner;Christopher M. Barnes;Vivien K. G. Lim;D. Lance Ferris

  • Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work

    Douglas J. Brown;D. Lance Ferris;Daniel Heller;Lisa M. Keeping

  • Ostracism, Self-Esteem, and Job Performance: When Do We Self-Verify and When Do We Self-Enhance?

    D. Lance Ferris;Huiwen Lian;Douglas J. Brown;Rachel Morrison

  • Organizational Supports and Organizational Deviance: The Mediating Role of Organization-Based Self-Esteem

    D. Lance Ferris;Douglas J. Brown;Daniel Heller

  • Abusive supervision and retaliation: A self-control framework

    Huiwen Lian;Douglas J. Brown;D. Lance Ferris;Lindie H. Liang

  • Ostracism and prosocial behavior: A social dilemma perspective.

    Daniel Balliet;Daniel Balliet;D.Lance Ferris

  • Interpersonal Injustice and Workplace Deviance: The Role of Esteem Threat

    D. Lance Ferris;Jeffrey R. Spence;Douglas J. Brown;Daniel Heller

  • Self-Love's Lost Labor: A Self-Enhancement Model of Workplace Incivility

    Yuanyi Chen;D. Lance Ferris;Ho Kwong Kwan;Ming Yan

  • APPROACH OR AVOIDANCE (OR BOTH?): INTEGRATING CORE SELF-EVALUATIONS WITHIN AN APPROACH/AVOIDANCE FRAMEWORK

    D. Lance Ferris;Christopher R. Rosen;Russell E. Johnson;Douglas J. Brown

  • Why Are Abusive Supervisors Abusive? A Dual-system Self-control Model

    Lindie H. Liang;Huiwen Lian;Douglas J. Brown;D. Lance Ferris

  • Blame it on the supervisor or the subordinate? Reciprocal relations between abusive supervision and organizational deviance.

    Huiwen Lian;D. Lance Ferris;Rachel Morrison;Douglas J. Brown

  • SELF-ESTEEM AND JOB PERFORMANCE: THE MODERATING ROLE OF SELF-ESTEEM CONTINGENCIES

    D. Lance Ferris;Huiwen Lian;Douglas J. Brown;Fiona X. J. Pang

  • When is success not satisfying? Integrating regulatory focus and approach/avoidance motivation theories to explain the relation between core self-evaluation and job satisfaction

    D Lance Ferris;Russell E Johnson;Christopher C Rosen;Emilija Djurdjevic

  • An approach-avoidance framework of workplace aggression

    D. Lance Ferris;Ming Yan;Vivien K. G. Lim;Yuanyi Chen

  • When does self-esteem relate to deviant behavior? The role of contingencies of self-worth.

    D. Lance Ferris;Douglas J. Brown;Huiwen Lian;Lisa M. Keeping

  • Self-Control at Work

    Huiwen Lian;Kai Chi Yam;D. Lance Ferris;Douglas Brown

  • RESEARCH REPORT Lost Sleep and Cyberloafing: Evidence From the Laboratory and a Daylight Saving Time Quasi-Experiment

    David T. Wagner;Christopher M. Barnes;Vivien K. G. Lim;D. Lance Ferris

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas J. Brown
Douglas J. Brown University of Waterloo
Russell E. Johnson
Russell E. Johnson Michigan State University
Christopher C. Rosen
Christopher C. Rosen University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Ho Kwong Kwan
Ho Kwong Kwan China Europe International Business School
Constantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides University of Southampton
Vivien K. G. Lim
Vivien K. G. Lim National University of Singapore
Ed Snape
Ed Snape Hong Kong Baptist University
Chu-Hsiang Chang
Chu-Hsiang Chang Michigan State University
Daniel Balliet
Daniel Balliet Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide range of rewarding careers that go beyond traditional roles. One growing field is speech-language pathology, which combines communication sciences and psychology to help individuals overcome speech and language disorders.

If you’re interested in this pathway, many universities now offer online programs that meet state-specific requirements. For example, to become a speech-language pathologist in Indiana, there are specific slp requirements in Indiana you must fulfill. Similarly, understanding the Iowa slp certification requirements is important for those planning to work in that state.

If you’re considering Kansas, research the Kansas speech pathologist certification requirements. In Kentucky, aspiring professionals need to meet the Kentucky slp certification requirements before beginning their careers.

Exploring related online degrees and clearly understanding state licensing processes is crucial for anyone who wants to move forward in this dynamic and meaningful field.

Best Scientists Citing D. Lance Ferris

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles