World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 74 1253 1116 96 86 215 14329

Bryan D. Young publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bryan D. Young between 1973 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bryan D. Young published across 52 years, from 1973 to 2024, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2010. 9 of the 280 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2010. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 4 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 13 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 8 publications 2024: 1 publication
1973 2024

280 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bryan D. Young: publications per year, 1973 to 2024
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 2
1975 2
1976 3
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 4
1982 1
1983 1
1984 2
1985 3
1986 4
1987 6
1988 2
1989 7
1990 6
1991 13
1992 7
1993 5
1994 7
1995 6
1996 3
1997 2
1998 5
1999 3
2000 4
2001 10
2002 11
2003 16
2004 11
2005 11
2006 14
2007 9
2008 13
2009 11
2010 24
2011 11
2012 11
2013 2
2014 6
2015 4
2016 1
2017 1
2018 0
2019 2
2020 1
2021 0
2022 1
2023 8
2024 1
Total 280
Download as CSV

Bryan D. Young publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan D. Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 207–216 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 215 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89 215
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Bryan D. Young D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan D. Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89 74
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Bryan D. Young is affiliated with St Bartholomew's Hospital in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on the field of Medicine, with significant work in subfields such as Physiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Rheumatology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their main research topics include:

  • Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
  • Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Streptococcal Infections and Treatments

Bryan D. Young has contributed to numerous publications. Recent papers include:

  • Inhibition of type 1 immunity with tofacitinib is associated with marked improvement in longstanding sarcoidosis, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Treatment of Multiorgan Sarcoidosis With Tofacitinib, 2020, ACR Open Rheumatology
  • Non-steroidal treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis: A systematic review, 2021, IJC Heart & Vasculature
  • Multimodality Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: A Brief Review, 2021, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Repression of sphingosine kinase (SK)-interacting protein (SKIP) in acute myeloid leukemia diminishes SK activity and its re-expression restores SK function, 2020, Journal of Biological Chemistry

The frequent co-authors with whom Bryan D. Young has collaborated include:

  • Edward J. Miller
  • William Damsky
  • Mridu Gulati
  • Brett King
  • Alice Wang

Publications by Bryan D. Young appear in multiple venues, notably:

  • Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • Nature Communications
  • ACR Open Rheumatology
  • Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
  • IJC Heart & Vasculature

Best Publications

  • A trithorax-like gene is interrupted by chromosome 11q23 translocations in acute leukaemias.

    Malek Djabali;Licia Selleri;Pauline Parry;Mark Bower

  • Mutations in ABCA12 underlie the severe congenital skin disease harlequin ichthyosis.

    David P. Kelsell;Elizabeth E. Norgett;Harriet Unsworth;Muy Teck Teh

  • Replication timing of the human genome

    Kathryn Woodfine;Heike Fiegler;David M. Beare;John E. Collins

  • Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism analysis reveals frequent partial uniparental disomy due to somatic recombination in acute myeloid leukemias.

    Manoj Raghavan;Debra M. Lillington;Spyros Skoulakis;Silvana Debernardi

  • Cloning of a representative genomic library of the human X chromosome after sorting by flow cytometry.

    Kay E. Davies;Bryan D. Young;Robert G. Elles;Marion E. Hill

  • Distinctive patterns of microRNA expression associated with karyotype in acute myeloid leukaemia.

    Amanda Dixon-McIver;Phil East;Charles A. Mein;Jean-Baptiste Cazier

  • Activation of the ERK/MAPK pathway: a signature genetic defect in posterior fossa pilocytic astrocytomas.

    Tim Forshew;Ruth G Tatevossian;Ruth G Tatevossian;Andrew R J Lawson;Jing Ma

  • Constitutional and somatic rearrangement of chromosome 21 in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

    Yilong Li;Claire Schwab;Sarra L. Ryan;Elli Papaemmanuil

  • Association between acquired uniparental disomy and homozygous gene mutation in acute myeloid leukemias.

    Jude Fitzgibbon;Lan-Lan Smith;Manoj Raghavan;Matthew L. Smith

  • Amplification and overexpression of JUNB is associated with primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas

    Xin Mao;Guy Orchard;Debra M. Lillington;Robin Russell-Jones

  • Genome-wide analysis of acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype reveals a unique pattern of homeobox gene expression distinct from those with translocation-mediated fusion events.

    Silvana Debernardi;Debra M. Lillington;Tracy Chaplin;Simon Tomlinson

  • FOXM1 upregulation is an early event in human squamous cell carcinoma and it is enhanced by nicotine during malignant transformation.

    Emilios Gemenetzidis;Amrita Bose;Adeel M. Riaz;Tracy Chaplin

  • Specific JAK2 mutation (JAK2R683) and multiple gene deletions in Down syndrome acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    Lyndal Kearney;David Gonzalez De Castro;Jenny Yeung;Julia Procter

  • Depletion of RUNX1/ETO in t(8;21) AML cells leads to genome-wide changes in chromatin structure and transcription factor binding

    A Ptasinska;S A Assi;D Mannari;S R James

  • Molecular cytogenetic analysis of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: identification of common genetic alterations in Sézary syndrome and mycosis fungoides.

    Xin Mao;D Lillington;J J Scarisbrick;Tracey Mitchell

  • Genomewide Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Microarray Mapping in Basal Cell Carcinomas Unveils Uniparental Disomy as a Key Somatic Event

    Muy-Teck Teh;Diana Blaydon;Tracy Chaplin;Nicola J. Foot

  • The significance of circulating cells carrying t(14;18) in long remission from follicular lymphoma.

    C. G. A. Price;J. Meerabux;S. Murtagh;F. E. Cotter

  • Construction and characterization of genomic libraries from specific human chromosomes

    Robert Krumlauf;Marc Jeanpierre;Bryan D. Young

  • A novel class of zinc finger/leucine zipper genes identified from the molecular cloning of the t(10;11) translocation in acute leukemia

    T. Chaplin;P. Ayton;O. A. Bernard;Vaskar Saha

  • The t(10;11) Translocation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (M5) Consistently Fuses the Leucine Zipper Motif of AF10 Onto the HRX Gene

    T Chaplin;O Bernard;O Bernard;O Bernard;HB Beverloo;HB Beverloo;HB Beverloo;V Saha;V Saha;V Saha

Frequent Co-Authors

Lyndal Kearney
Lyndal Kearney Institute of Cancer Research
Sean Whittaker
Sean Whittaker King's College London
David Oscier
David Oscier Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Mark Bower
Mark Bower Imperial College London
Daniel M. Berney
Daniel M. Berney Barts Health NHS Trust
Christine J. Harrison
Christine J. Harrison Newcastle University
Jude Fitzgibbon
Jude Fitzgibbon Queen Mary University of London
Mel Greaves
Mel Greaves Institute of Cancer Research
Andrew Collins
Andrew Collins University of Oslo
Nigel P. Carter
Nigel P. Carter Wellcome Sanger Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology can open doors to a wide variety of educational and career opportunities, especially with the flexibility that online programs offer. Many students find value in interdisciplinary learning, and the most affordable online interdisciplinary studies programs allow you to blend biology with other interests such as data science or communication.

For those interested in a technical or analytical edge, online mathematics degrees provide a strong foundation for careers in bioinformatics and quantitative biology. If your interests cross into the visual or creative side of science, consider programs like graphic design schools online. These can prepare you for roles in scientific communication, medical illustration, or digital education.

Interdisciplinary skills are increasingly in demand. For instance, architectural principles can inform lab design and research environments—making an architect degree online surprisingly relevant to molecular biology graduates considering careers in scientific facility planning or management.

Best Scientists Citing Bryan D. Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles