World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9652 9031 5090 4645 64 15623

William H. Bommer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William H. Bommer between 1993 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William H. Bommer published across 32 years, from 1993 to 2024, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2008. 4 of the 74 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2008. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 6 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 4 publications
1993 2024

74 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William H. Bommer: publications per year, 1993 to 2024
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 6
1997 0
1998 0
1999 2
2000 2
2001 0
2002 5
2003 4
2004 2
2005 6
2006 2
2007 4
2008 7
2009 4
2010 4
2011 1
2012 4
2013 1
2014 1
2015 0
2016 1
2017 1
2018 2
2019 1
2020 2
2021 2
2022 3
2023 0
2024 4
Total 74
Download as CSV

William H. Bommer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Bommer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 64 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 64
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

William H. Bommer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Bommer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

William H. Bommer is affiliated with California State University, Fresno in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, and Social Sciences. The subfields in which they have contributed include Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Education, and Management of Technology and Innovation.

Their scholarly work addresses several key topics, including:

  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
  • International Student and Expatriate Challenges

William H. Bommer has published research in various academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Industrial Management & Data Systems
  • International Journal of Bank Marketing
  • Emerging Markets Review
  • Journal of International Education in Business
  • Journal of Small Business Strategy

Representative recent papers authored by William H. Bommer include:

  • A meta-analysis of eWallet adoption using the UTAUT model, 2022, International Journal of Bank Marketing
  • The intention to use cryptocurrency: A meta-analysis of what we know, 2022, Emerging Markets Review
  • A meta-analytic examination of the antecedents explaining the intention to use fintech, 2022, Industrial Management & Data Systems

Other notable recent publications with coauthors include:

  • The success of short-term study abroad programs: a social networks perspective, 2020, Journal of International Education in Business
  • Influence of CEO and Firm Characteristics on SME Internationalization: Evidence From California, 2021, Journal of Small Business Strategy

William H. Bommer has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Emil Milevoj, Shailesh Rana, Rich DeJordy, James M. Schmidtke, and Elena Beleska-Spasova. Emil Milevoj and Shailesh Rana are recurring collaborators appearing in multiple works.

Best Publications

  • Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;William H. Bommer

  • A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member Exchange Integrating the Past With an Eye Toward the Future

    James H. Dulebohn;William H. Bommer;Robert C. Liden;Robyn L. Brouer

  • The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange.

    Sandy J. Wayne;Lynn M. Shore;William H. Bommer;Lois E. Tetrick

  • Do Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership Explain Variance Above and Beyond Transformational Leadership? A Meta-Analysis:

    Julia E. Hoch;William H. Bommer;James H. Dulebohn;Dongyuan Wu

  • Leading from Within: The Effects of Emotion Recognition and Personality on Transformational Leadership Behavior

    Robert S. Rubin;David C. Munz;William H. Bommer

  • ON THE INTERCHANGEABILITY OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS

    William H. Bommer;Jonathan L. Johnson;Gregory A. Rich;Philip M. Podsakoff

  • Changing attitudes about change: longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change

    William H. Bommer;Gregory A. Rich;Robert S. Rubin

  • Security lapses and the omission of information security measures: A threat control model and empirical test

    Michael Workman;William H. Bommer;Detmar Straub

  • Meta-analysis of the relationships between Kerr and Jermier's substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance.

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;William H. Bommer

  • Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research

    Philip M. Podsakoff;William H. Bommer;Nathan P. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie

  • Leader--member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfillment: a multilevel examination.

    David J. Henderson;Sandy J. Wayne;Lynn M. Shore;William H. Bommer

  • Setting the stage for effective leadership: Antecedents of transformational leadership behavior

    William H. Bommer;Robert S. Rubin;Timothy T. Baldwin

  • Does one good turn deserve another? coworker influences on employee citizenship

    William H. Bommer;Edward W. Miles;Steven L. Grover

  • EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE OF DIRECT AND MODERATED EFFECTS

    Joseph C. Rode;Christine H. Mooney;Marne L. Arthaud-Day;Janet P. Near

  • Searching for a Needle in a Haystack: Trying to Identify the Illusive Moderators of Leadership Behaviors

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Mike Ahearne;William H. Bommer

  • Life Satisfaction and Student Performance.

    Joseph C. Rode;Marne L. Arthaud-Day;Christine H. Mooney;Janet P. Near

  • Using extracurricular activity as an indicator of interpersonal skill: Prudent evaluation or recruiting malpractice?

    Robert S. Rubin;Robert S. Rubin;William H. Bommer;Timothy T. Baldwin

  • The Effects of Cognitive Style and Media Richness on Commitment to Telework and Virtual Teams

    Michael Workman;William Kahnweiler;William Bommer

  • Do leaders reap what they sow? Leader and employee outcomes of leader organizational cynicism about change

    Robert S. Rubin;Erich C. Dierdorff;William H. Bommer;Timothy T. Baldwin

  • Assessing the Effectiveness of Whole Person Learning Pedagogy in Skill Acquisition

    J. Duane Hoover;Robert C. Giambatista;Ritch L. Sorenson;William H. Bommer

  • Does prevalence mitigate relevance? The moderating effect of group-level OCB on employee performance.

    William H. Bommer;Erich C. Dierdorff;Robert S. Rubin

  • Apples and apples or apples and oranges? A meta-analysis of objective and subjective measures of salesperson performance.

    Gregory A. Rich;William H. Bommer;Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy T. Baldwin
Timothy T. Baldwin Indiana University
Philip M. Podsakoff
Philip M. Podsakoff University of Florida
Scott B. MacKenzie
Scott B. MacKenzie Indiana University
Janet P. Near
Janet P. Near University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Karl Aquino
Karl Aquino University of British Columbia
Lynn M. Shore
Lynn M. Shore Colorado State University
Detmar W. Straub
Detmar W. Straub Temple University
Lois E. Tetrick
Lois E. Tetrick George Mason University
Sandy J. Wayne
Sandy J. Wayne University of Illinois at Chicago
Brian J. Hoffman
Brian J. Hoffman University of Georgia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of online degree options and professional pathways. For those interested in mental health, social services, or behavioral analysis, online programs offer flexibility and accessibility while maintaining academic rigor.

Social work is a popular field for psychology students seeking to make an impactful difference in communities. Prospective students may consider some of the most valuable online social work programs in Tennessee or the most valuable online social work degree programs in Texas. These accredited programs offer strong job placement records and comprehensive curricula designed to prepare graduates for diverse roles in the field.

For those drawn to behavioral therapy, becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) can be a rewarding path. Requirements vary by location. If you plan to pursue this career in Vermont, review the Vermont bcba requirements. If you’re looking toward Virginia, specific guidelines can be found under Virginia bcba requirements.

Whichever direction you choose, researching program value, state credentialing, and online learning options will help you build a strong foundation for a career in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing William H. Bommer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles