World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 60 1413 1259 669 587 118 26413

Janet P. Near publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janet P. Near between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janet P. Near published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2005. 2 of the 120 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2005. 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1978 2025

120 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janet P. Near: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 3
1979 1
1980 3
1981 0
1982 2
1983 7
1984 5
1985 7
1986 4
1987 4
1988 2
1989 4
1990 1
1991 4
1992 4
1993 4
1994 5
1995 4
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 3
2002 1
2003 2
2004 5
2005 8
2006 0
2007 3
2008 7
2009 1
2010 1
2011 0
2012 5
2013 2
2014 1
2015 1
2016 3
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
2020 2
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
2025 2
Total 120
Download as CSV

Janet P. Near publications per year - data summary

  • Janet P. Near, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Nebraska–Lincoln, has 120 publications recorded across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1978 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2005, with 8 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1979, 1990, 1997, 1999 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 8 of the 48 years in the span carry no publications at all (1981, 2006, 2011, 2017 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.0 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 3 publications, 3% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1978-1993: 55 publications (3.4 per year); 1994-2009: 46 publications (2.9 per year); 2010-2025: 19 publications (1.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Janet P. Near publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet P. Near sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 118 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 118
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Janet P. Near publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Janet P. Near, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Nebraska–Lincoln, records 118 publications - the 23rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 23% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Janet P. Near, and about 77% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Janet P. Near ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Janet P. Near D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet P. Near sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106 60
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Janet P. Near D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Janet P. Near, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Nebraska–Lincoln, records 60 D-Index - the 82nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 82% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Janet P. Near, and about 18% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Janet P. Near ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Janet P. Near is affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Business, Management and Accounting as well as Medicine, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach.

Their work primarily focuses on several key subfields, such as Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Gender Studies, Strategy and Management, and Information Systems and Management.

Research themes by Janet P. Near include:

  • Management and Organizational Studies
  • Sports, Gender, and Society
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Legal Education and Practice Innovations
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workplace Health and Well-being

Their recent publications cover a range of topics within these areas, featuring articles in notable academic journals:

  • Review of Whistleblowing, Toward a New Theory by Kate Kenny, 2020, Journal of Business Ethics
  • Individual and Organizational Rule-Breaking: Test of an Integrated Multilevel Model, 2023, Journal of Business Ethics
  • Change in Health in Relation to Change in Work and Family Variables: A Longitudinal Study, 2020, Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Whole Brain Spectral Power Differences During Infancy Following Antenatal SARS-CoV-2 and Zika Virus Exposure: Findings From Cohorts in Boston, Massachusetts and San Juan, Puerto Rico, 2025, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
  • EEG trajectories across the first two years of life are associated with maternal depression, anxiety, and perceived stress, 2025, Journal of Affective Disorders

Janet P. Near frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Viviane Valdes, Reha Karadag, Haolin Fu, Dashiell D. Sacks, and Adriana S. Méndez Leal. These collaborations contribute to the interdisciplinary nature of their research output.

Their work is often found in the following publication venues:

  • Journal of Business Ethics
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Best Publications

  • ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR: ITS NATURE AND ANTECEDENTS

    C. Ann Smith;Dennis W. Organ;Janet P. Near

  • Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing

    Janet P. Near;Marcia P. Miceli

  • Blowing the whistle : the organizational and legal implications for companies and employees

    Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near

  • Whistle-Blowing in Organizations

    Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near;Terry Morehead Dworkin

  • Can Illegal Corporate Behavior be Predicted? An Event History Analysis

    Melissa S. Baucus;Janet P. Near

  • Effective-Whistle Blowing

    Janet P. Near;Marcia P. Miceli

  • Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle-blowing decisions.

    Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near

  • Whistle-Blowing: Myth and Reality:

    Janet P. Near;Marcia P. Miceli

  • The Relationships Among Beliefs, Organizational Position, and Whistle-Blowing Status: A Discriminant Analysis

    Marcia Parmerlee Miceli;Janet P. Near

  • INDIVIDUAL AND SITUATIONAL CORRELATES OF WHISTLE‐BLOWING

    Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near

  • The Relationship Between Work and Nonwork Domains: A Review of Empirical Research

    Janet P. Near;Robert W. Rice;Raymond G. Hunt

  • The Job-Satisfaction/ Life-Satisfaction Relationship: A Review of Empirical Research

    Robert W. Rice;Janet P. Near;Raymond G. Hunt

  • Antecedents and Outcomes of Retaliation Against Whistleblowers: Gender Differences and Power Relationships

    Michael T. Rehg;Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near;James R. Van Scotter

  • Does Type of Wrongdoing Affect the Whistle-Blowing Process?

    Janet P. Near;Michael T. Rehg;James R. Van Scotter;Marcia P. Miceli

  • The Subjective Well-being Construct: A Test of its Convergent, Discriminant, and Factorial Validity

    Marne L Arthaud-day;Joseph C Rode;Christine H. Mooney;Janet P. Near

  • WHO BLOWS THE WHISTLE AND WHY

    Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near;Charles R. Schwenk

  • A Word to the Wise: How Managers and Policy-Makers Can Encourage Employees to Report Wrongdoing

    Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near;Terry Morehead Dworkin;Terry Morehead Dworkin

  • Retaliation against whistle blowers: Predictors and effects.

    Janet P. Near;Marcia P. Miceli

  • Cognition vs affect in measures of job satisfaction.

    Dennis W. Organ;Janet P. Near

  • EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE OF DIRECT AND MODERATED EFFECTS

    Joseph C. Rode;Christine H. Mooney;Marne L. Arthaud-Day;Janet P. Near

  • Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees.

    Jill W. Graham;Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcia P. Miceli
Marcia P. Miceli Georgetown University
William H. Bommer
William H. Bommer California State University, Fresno
Timothy T. Baldwin
Timothy T. Baldwin Indiana University
Dean B. McFarlin
Dean B. McFarlin Duquesne University
Catherine M. Daily
Catherine M. Daily Indiana University
Richard W. Olshavsky
Richard W. Olshavsky Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to a wide variety of online degree options and career paths. Many students are drawn to advanced programs that offer flexibility and accessibility, especially if they are balancing professional or personal commitments.

For those interested in clinical psychology and counseling, online psyd programs provide a pathway to advanced licensure in professional psychology. Students looking for a focused counseling approach can consider marriage and family therapy online programs accredited, which prepare graduates to work with individuals, couples, and families in therapeutic settings.

For broader career opportunities in human behavior, mental health, social services, or research, online masters psychology programs are both flexible and cost-effective. Educators and academic leaders looking to further their expertise can also benefit from 1 year edd programs online, which deliver advanced leadership skills in an expedited format.

Each of these online degrees expands career possibilities in education, therapy, research, and beyond. Choosing an accredited, reputable program can help ensure strong outcomes and greater professional advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Janet P. Near

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles